Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tularam Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Decided On : May-02-2018

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 302, the Indian Penal Code, Section 299, Section 300, Section 302, Section 304

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, S.L.P., The State of Madhya Pradesh, Bhadri Lodhi, Raju, Ramnath and Bhadri Lodhi, Tularam, Raju, PW-7, Bhadri, the Trial Court, the High Court, Bhadri, IPC, IPC, Crl, Exception 4, Exception 4, IPC, IPC, Exception 4, IPC, IPC, the Trial Court, the High Court, Bhadri Lodhi, Bhadri Lodhi, Bhadri Lodhi, Bhadri Lodhi, IPC, Bhadri Lodhi, Bhadri Lodhi, IPC, IPC

PERSON: Madan B. Lokur, Ramnath, Ramnath, Bipatlal Lodhi, Ramnath, Sakharam, Bhadri Lodhi, Bhadri Lodhi, Sakharam, Bhadri Lodhi, Ramnath, Mahasingh, Shanta Bai, Singh Singh Gond, Jogi Lodhi PW-10, Hori Lal, Bhadri Lodhi, S.N. Bhaskar, Exh, P.32, Ramnath, Bhadri Lodhi, Madan B. Lokur, Deepak Gupta

NORP: J.1

PRODUCT: Tularam, Tularam, ½, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam

DATE: 9th June, 2018, 2017, 2018, 2017, 2018, 2017, 2017, 2018, 2017, 2018, 2017, 6 14, almost 14 years, May 2, 2018, 2018, 2017

CARDINAL: 2002.3, two, 1, 6, one, 3, 2, 6, two, 3, 4.-, two, 1, 5, 4, 6, 10, 5, 6, 6

WORK_OF_ART: Ramnath and Raju

TIME: about 6 p.m., about 7.30 p.m.

GPE: Maltibai, Surain, Singh v. State, death.12, New Delhi

ORDINAL: 5th, first, third, first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //