Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Tularam Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Decided On : May-02-2018
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 302, the Indian Penal Code, Section 299, Section 300, Section 302, Section 304
ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, S.L.P., The State of Madhya Pradesh, Bhadri Lodhi, Raju, Ramnath and Bhadri Lodhi, Tularam, Raju, PW-7, Bhadri, the Trial Court, the High Court, Bhadri, IPC, IPC, Crl, Exception 4, Exception 4, IPC, IPC, Exception 4, IPC, IPC, the Trial Court, the High Court, Bhadri Lodhi, Bhadri Lodhi, Bhadri Lodhi, Bhadri Lodhi, IPC, Bhadri Lodhi, Bhadri Lodhi, IPC, IPC
PERSON: Madan B. Lokur, Ramnath, Ramnath, Bipatlal Lodhi, Ramnath, Sakharam, Bhadri Lodhi, Bhadri Lodhi, Sakharam, Bhadri Lodhi, Ramnath, Mahasingh, Shanta Bai, Singh Singh Gond, Jogi Lodhi PW-10, Hori Lal, Bhadri Lodhi, S.N. Bhaskar, Exh, P.32, Ramnath, Bhadri Lodhi, Madan B. Lokur, Deepak Gupta
NORP: J.1
PRODUCT: Tularam, Tularam, ½, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam, Tularam
DATE: 9th June, 2018, 2017, 2018, 2017, 2018, 2017, 2017, 2018, 2017, 2018, 2017, 6 14, almost 14 years, May 2, 2018, 2018, 2017
CARDINAL: 2002.3, two, 1, 6, one, 3, 2, 6, two, 3, 4.-, two, 1, 5, 4, 6, 10, 5, 6, 6
WORK_OF_ART: Ramnath and Raju
TIME: about 6 p.m., about 7.30 p.m.
GPE: Maltibai, Surain, Singh v. State, death.12, New Delhi
ORDINAL: 5th, first, third, first, second