State of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its President

Decided On : Apr-12-2018

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: The Electricity Act, Page 1, the Indian Electricity Act, Section 79, Section 80, Page 5, Section 81, Section 82, Section 84, Section 85, Section 86, Section 87, Section 88, Section 84, Section 85, section 42, the Grid Code, section 79, section 3, Section 77, Page 10 of 84, Section 84, Section 84, Section 84(2).14, Section 78, Section 78, Section 113, Page 13, Section 86, Section 79, Section 16, Section 45, Section 46, Section 57, Section 61, Section 66, Section 86(1)(f, the Constitution Bench, Section 113, Section 84, Constitution, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Penal Code, section 100, Section 84, Section 85, Section 85, Section 84, the Constitution Bench, Section 86(1)(f, Page 28, Section 76(2, the Electricity Act, Section 3, Section 84(2, Section 85, Section 92, Section 92, Section 84(1, Article 141 of the Constitution, Section 86(1)(f, Section 4 of The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, Section 4, Section 17, Section 84, Section 18, Section 85, Section 3(3, Section 62, Section 86(1)(f, Section 11, the Electricity Act, Section 11, Section 158, Section 85(2, Section 84, Section 86(1)(f, Section 33(4, Section 9(2, Section 85, Section 85(5, Section 131, Section 68(2, Section 68 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Chapter V. Section 68(2, Section 68, Section 94 to 96, Section 97, Section 178, Section 111(6, Section 121, Section 111(6, section 62, the Electricity Act, Section 64, Section 64, the Constitution Bench, Section 82(2, Section 3, Chapter V, Section 24, Section 84(1, Section 85, Section 2, Section 84, Section 85, Section 84, Section 84, Chapter, Section 84, Section 85, Section 86, Page 61, Section 86(1)(f, Section 84, Section 113, Section 85, Section 85, Section 92, Page 64, Section 85, Section 85, Section 84(1, Section 82(4, Page 65, Section 84(1, Section 77, Section 77, Section 86, Section 86, Page 67, section 76, section 82, section 83, the Code of Civil Procedure, Page 68 of 84 Code, Section 94, Section 95, the Indian Penal Code, Section 96, Section 129, Section 86, Section 86(1, Section 86(1)(f, the Limitation Act, Constitution, Section 86(1, the Constitution of India, Section 86, Section 86, Section 86, Section 86(1)(f, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.14697 of, USERS’, WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS, C.A. No.13451/2015 T.C.(C, C.A. No.3759-3760/2016 T.P.(C, JUDGMENT, Central, Commissions, a High Court, the State Commission, the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice, the Central Commission, Commissions, the Tamil Nadu State Electricity Commission, the Gujarat High Court, the Gujarat State Regulatory Commission, Court, Court, Transfer Petitions, The Union of India, the State Commissions, the State Regulatory Commissions, Commissions, Central Electricity Authority, Appellate Tribunal, Statement of Objects & Reasons, the Electricity Supply Industry, the Electricity (Supply) Act, the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, The State Electricity Boards, the Electricity (Supply) Act, The Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, Regulatory Commissions, the Central Commission, the State Commissions, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice, a High Court, the Central Commission, State Commissions, the State Government, a High Court, the Selection Committee, the Central Commission, a Central Advisory Committee, the Central Commission, the Central Advisory Committee, Committee, the Central Commission, State Commission, State Commissions, Selection Committee, State Commission, State Commission, the Central Advisory Committee, the State Advisory Committee, State Commission, the State Commission, the State Government, a High Court, the State Commission, the State Commission, Selection Committee, State Commission, The State Government, the State Commission, Selection Committee, the High Court, State, Authority, the Central Commission, the High Court, the Selection Committee, Selection Committee, Selection Committee, the State Commission, Selection Committee, the Selection Committee, State, the State Commission, State, State, State, State Commission, the State Government, State, the State Commission, State Commission, the State Commission, the National Electricity Policy, the Central Commission, the State Commissions, Central Commission, Central, State Commission, the State Government, the High Court, the High Court, the Central Commission, the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice, The Selection Committee, the State Commission, the High Court, the High Court, the State Commission, the High Court, the Selection Committee, the Central Commission, the Selection Committee, the Planning Commission, the Central Commission, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Chief Justice of, The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Appellate Tribunal, the Appropriate Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice, the Appellate Tribunal, the Union of India, Commissions, a State Commission, the Central Commission, Appropriate Commission, the State Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the National Electricity Policy, all State Commissions, the Selection Committee, the Chief Justice concerned.17, Court, PPN Power Generating Company Private, the State Commission, Court, the State 1 (, the State Commission, Court, the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India, the State Commission, Court, the State Commission, the State Commission, Bench, the State Government, a High Court, the High Court, the State Commission, the Tamil Nadu State Commission, the State Commission, Court, Bench, the State Government, a High Court, the State Commission, Commission, Bench, the State Government, Pareena Swarup v. Union of India3, Commission, Tribunal, the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the Appropriate Commission, the Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Gujarat High Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Appropriate Commission under Sections 94, 95 & 96, Appropriate, Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, Commission, The Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, seizure.- The Appropriate Commission, Commission, Commission, Appropriate Commission, Commission, C.A. No.13451/2015, the State of Tamil Nadu):24, The State Government, the State of Tamil Nadu, Commission, C.A. No.14697/2015, the Gujarat State Regulatory Commission, the Gujarat State Electricity Regulatory Commission, the State Commission, Court, Madras Bar Association v. Union of India & Anr.5, the National Tax Tribunal, the National Tax Tribunal Act, Tribunal, the High Courts, inter alia, the Chairpersons and Members of the Tribunals, the Union of India, Tribunals, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunals, the Judges of the High Court, Madras Bar Association v. Union of India7, the Appellate Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Selection Committee, the State Commission, Court, a State Commission, a High Court, Commission, Court, Bench, Court, the State Commission, Judicial, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Essar Power Ltd.11, State, State, Emphasis, the State Commission, the Gujarat State Commission, Union of India, the High Courts, the State Commission, the High Court, the Electricity (Supply) Act, The Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, the High Court, the State Commission, the High Court, Supreme Court, the Chief Justice, the High Court, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Essar Power Ltd.14(GJ-II, Madras Bar Association v. Union of India & Anr.15, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Courts, High Court, Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited v., National Thermal Power Corporation Limited &, the Central Commission, the High Court, Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Selection Committee for Members under Section 85, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Commission, Commission, under:“92, Proceedings of Appropriate, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Page 32, Commission, Commission, Sections 94 to 96, Madurai Power Corporation Private, the High Court, Madras Bar Association v. Union of Page 33, India & Anr.18, Court, the High Court, Natural Resources Allocation, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Madras Bar Association, State, Parliament, Parliament, a State Commission, the Appropriate Commission or, Authority or Joint Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, Commissions, the Securities and Exchange Board, Learned Senior Counsel, the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, The Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, the Competition Commission of India, Commission, the Chief Justice of India, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Commission, the Supreme Court, the Union of India, Commission, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd.22, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Mimansa, the State Commission, the Central Commission, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, the Arbitration & Conciliation, Learned Senior Counsel, the Selection Committee, the High Court, State, the Central Transmission Utility, the State Transmission Utility, the Appropriate Commission, Court, Commission, a High Court, Advocate, the State Commission, Transfer Petition, The Tamil Nadu Government, Selection Committee, the State Commission, Committee, TANGEDCO, the Selection Committee, the Selection Committee, Selection Committee, the State Commission, the State Commission, TANGEDCO, Nos.6 & 7, Nos.6 & 7, the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, State, Court, Commission, the Selection Committee, the Selection Committee, the State Government, the JP Power Ventures Limited, Court, Mor Modern Cooperative Transport Society Ltd., Financial Commissioner &, Govt, the Motor Vehicles Act, the State Government, State Transport Authority and Regional Transport Authorities, the State Government, The Transport, the Office of the General, the Haryana Roadways, T.C.(C) No.137/2015 & IA Nos.3 & 4/2016, IA Nos.3 & 4/2016, CLP Wind Farms Private Limited, Court, the Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Page, DRP Nos.62/2014 & 63/2014, Court, Court, the High Court, Bachahan Devi & Ar, Gorakhpur & Anr25, A.P. Power Coordination Committee & Ors, Lanco Kondapalli Power Ltd. & Ors.26, Commission, a Civil Court, Commission, this Court in Union of India, Commission, Commission, the Appellate Authority, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Commission, Union of India, Learned AG, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, Appellate, The Appellate Tribunal, the Appropriate Commission, Tribunal, the Appropriate Commission, The Appellate Tribunal, the Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Commission, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the State Commission, the State of Tamil Nadu, The Selection Committee, This Selection Committee, the High Court, the Ministry of Power, the State Distribution Utilities, State, Tribunal, the State Commissions, The State Commission, the State Regulatory Commissions, Tariff, Utilities, Commission, the State Commission, ARR, Learned Senior Advocate, The Dominion of India & Anr, Legislature, Bench, State, the State Commission, Mor Modern Cooperative Transport Society Ltd.31, Board, Board, the Gujarat Commission, a Master of Business Management in Finance, Bachelor of Engineering, Learned Senior Advocate, the Gujarat High Court, the State Commission, Selection Committee, the State Commission, the High Court, the Selection Committee, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Appropriate Commission or, Authority or Joint Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, Authority, Appellate Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Government, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Sainik Motors, State of Rajasthan32and State, U.P., Maxwell, The Interpretation of Statutes (Twelfth Edition, Courts of Justice, Legislature, Liverpool Borough, P.D. 203, the High Court, Act.81, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Appellate Tribunal under Section 112, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the State Commission, Page 62, 95 & 96, the Gujarat High Court, Commission, Commission, the Gujarat High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, a Selection Committee, the High Court, the High Court, the Selection Committee, the High Court, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, State Commissions, Page 66, the Central Commission, the State Commission, the Central Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, State, the State Commission, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam, the State Commission, the State Commission, Sections 94 to 96, Sections, the Central Commission, the State Commission, the Joint Commission, the Central Regulatory Commission, the State Regulatory Commission, the Joint Commission, Sections, State, the State Commission, Sections 345 & 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Commission, Commission, Sections 142 & 146, the State Commission, a ‘Commission, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd.39, the State Commission, A.P. Power Coordination Committee & Ors.40, Gujarat Urja Vikas, Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the High Court, Sections 5 & 14, the Judicial Committee of The Privy Council, Shell Company of, Limited, Bharat Bank Ltd., the Bharat Bank, the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Parker & Co., sec, Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd., Lakshmi Chand48;Engineering, Indo-China Steam Navigation Co. Ltd., Associated Cement Companies Ltd., P.N., Union of India52 and State, Gujarat Revenue, Court, Supp, the Gujarat Urja Vikas, the State Commission, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the State Commission, the Tamil Nadu State Commission, the High Court, Court, The Harvard Law School, Commission, Commission, Court, Commission, The Harvard Law School Page 77, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission

DATE: 2015, 2003, 10.6.2003, 1910, 1948, 1998, 1948, 1998, one month, six months, three months, 84, 84 15, 55, 2014, 2 1992, 2002, 1908, 84, 1973, 1973, 84 25, 2005, 2014, 2010, 55, 2008, 31, 1948, 1998, 14 (2016, 1998, 2011, 84 36, 201220, 2012, 40, the year 1991, 2003, 1997, 1992, 84 43, 1998, 2006, 1996, 2003, 1996, six months, 46, 47, 26.9.2013, three months, 84 48, 12.12.2014, 2013, 1988, 1988, 56, 2008, 86, 2016, 2013, 47, 84 59, 11.12.2014 and 12.12.2014, 11.11.2011, annual, a number of years, 64, 2003, annual, one month, 1955, 30 (1999, 2006, 37 years, more than 19 years, 84 72, 1962, 1961, 1860, 1877, 1908, 1860, 1973, 1963, 1931, 48 1963, 1964, 1965, 1992, 2012, the year 1892, 1892, 1892, 84

PERSON: T.C.(C, T.C.(C, KISHAN KAUL, Chairperson, Gazette, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, namely:--, namely:--, namely:--, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Benches, Chairperson, Bench, Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu2, Chairperson, Chairperson, namely:--, Shekhar Naphade, Jayant Bhushan, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, namely:--, Judges.33, Jayant Bhushan, Chairperson, Sajan Poovayya, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Mohan Parasaran, Arvind Datar, Chairperson, under:“2, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, G. Rajagopal, Rajagopal, Chairperson, 27.2.2014, S. Akshayakumar, S. Nagalsamy, Nagalsamy, Chairperson, Nand Lal Jaiswal23, Chairperson, Haryana, T.C.(C, Sujatha Balachander, Namit Sharma27, SCC46827, Rejoinder Response:60, Naphade, Nos, Page, Shrinbai A. Irani, Ajit Singh, Chairperson, Page, Jayant Bhushan, functions.71, Chairperson, Chairperson.74, under:“2, Chairperson, Babu, Canara Bank, Bangalore, Campbell L.C., Penzance said:“I, Turner, Howard v. Bodington, Chairperson, Jayant Bhushan, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Commission.91, under:“2, Chairperson, observed.95, Mazdoor Sabha v. Hind Cycles, Jasjit Singh50, Sarojini Ramaswami v., SCR36652, Bench, Eugene Wambaugh, Wambaugh, John Chipman Grey58

NORP: J.1, Gujarat, Rajesh Awasthi, R.

CARDINAL: 7.2.2014, 2, 84, 3, 84, 8, 84, 84, 1, 2, 1, 6, 84, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 7, 84, 4, two, 5, 6, 86, 1, 8, 1, 2, 9, 3, 4, 11, 1, one, one, two, 12, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 84, 12, at least one, one, at least one, one, 84, 11, 14, 84, 15, 84, 11, 16, one, 2, 17, one, 18, 84, at least one, 14, 19, 84, 1, 5, 20, 2, 3, 193, 228, 345, 346, 2, 1974).96, 21, 84 23, 2, 22, 4, 10, 23, 84, 6, 11, 24, 84, one, 7, 25, 84, 2, 3, 5, 6, 25, 8, 26, 84, 59, 1, 9, 4, 40, more than 10, 12, 13, 84, 33, 9, 29, 84, 16, 12, 30, 84, four, 31, one, 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, one, 5, 84, 37, 2, 3, 84, 59, 60, 18, 19, 10, 34, 84, more than three, 43, 36, 64, 21, 2 SCC431Page 37, 84, 6, two, 22, 38, 84, one, 39, 84, two, 40, 84, three, two, 27.12.2013, 31.12.2013, 9.1.2014, 41, 7.2.2014.49, 6.6.2014, 9.6.2014.50, two, 2:1, two, 42, 84, two, two, 5, 23, 1, 43, 84, 2, 24, 6, 45, 25, 12, 46, 84, 181, 26, 3, 10, 27.2.2013, 28, 48, 84, 6, 61, 62, 49, 84, 23.9.2013, 31.12.2013, 50, 21.1.2011, two, 86, 8.1, 7, 51, 84, 1, 1, only one, 29, 1, 52, 84, 67, at least one, 2, 68, 7, 53, 84, 14, 54, two, 55, 84, 43, 1, 56, 84, 2, 2, 2, 57, 84, one, 32, 2, 58, 84, 35, 2, 508, 36, 2, 59, 84 79, 1, 2, 60, 84, 2, 37, 1, two, two, at least one, 84, 2, 3, 5, 6, 63, 84, 2, 1, 1, 1, 84, 1, 84, more than three, two, two, six, five, two, at least one, 84, 1, more than one, 84, 1, 38, 228, 69, 84, 1, 39, 40, 41, 70, 84, 42, 71, 84, 96, 71, 97, two, four, 1, 2, 45, 2, 2, 340, 84, 3, 4, two, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 98, 1, 6, 2, 4, 10 SCC353Page 73, 84, one, 54, 55, 74, 84, one, 75, 84, 17, 76, 84, 104, 58, 59, 60, 61, 78, 84

GPE: India, India, India, the State of Gujarat, non-Judges, District Judges, India, Brahm Dutt v. Union of India21, M.S., India, Notwithstanding, Sankey, Saville, Saville, Huddart, Gujarat

EVENT: the Page 4, MJ-II, MJ-II, MJ-II

PRODUCT: Chairperson, Para 6(1, Section Page, Chairperson, Tax Laws, Chairperson, SCC10315, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, 31.5.2014, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson, Chairperson

FAC: Tamil Nadu Generation, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu Generation, Madras Bar, Tamil Nadu Generation, Madras Bar, Tamil Nadu Generation, Tamil Nadu Generation, Tamil Nadu Generation, the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation, Tamil Nadu Generation, Sections 193, Tamil Nadu Generation, Tamil Nadu Generation, Madras Bar Association60, Madras Bar Association61

TIME: this very Act, under this Act, under this Act

MONEY: 84 xxxx, 30 per cent, 59 per cent, requires,-- xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

ORDINAL: second, second, third, first, first, second, first, Firstly, Secondly, first, first, first

LOC: Executive, Madras

WORK_OF_ART: Exceptional Construction, Moorehead46 and Cooper v. Wilson47, The Inversion Test, The Study of Cases”56 in, The Study of Cases (Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., Wambaugh Test, The Inversion Test, The Inversion Test, The Study of Cases (Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.