Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Allokam Peddabbayya Vs. Allahabad Bank .

Decided On : Jun-19-2017

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 91 of the Act, Section 60 and Section 91 of the Act, Section 60, Section 60, Section 91 of the Act, Section 91, Section 60, Defendant No.2, Section 60, Section 91 of the Act, Section 60, Section 60, Rule 8, Section 60, Section 60, Section 60, Section 60 of the Act, Section 60, Section 60, Section 60, Section 60 of the Act, Defendant No.2

CARDINAL: 1, 4, 2, 05.09.1993, 02.07.1997, 1997.3, 2 to 4, 27.02.2002, 4, 3, 2, 4, 6, 5, 5, 210, two, 60 and 91, 91, 28.02.1991, 05.09.1993, 8, 12, 4.13, 9, 6 SCC780, 17, 9, 18, 14, 15, 20-2-1990, 2, 7, 2, 21, 19

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, Allahabad Bank, Respondent(s, the Principal Junior Civil Judge, FTC, Appellants, Bank, Bank, Execution Petition, Suit, the Appeal A.S. No.67, the Plaintiffs in Execution Petition No.203, CPC, Bank, Suit, Suit, Suit, The High Court, Bank, Learned Senior Counsel, Appellants, Suit, Bank, CPC, Suit, Suit, Suit, Reliance, Nagubai Ammal & Ors, B. Shama Rao & Ors., Shri Tahkur Taraknathji, Mhadagonda Ramgonda Patil & Ors, Shripal Balwant Rainade & Ors, the Suit of the Bank 4, Defendants 3 and 4, Suit, Reliance, Suit, Suit, Suit, Bhaiya Raghunath Singh & Others, Musammat Hansraj Kunwar & ors., Learned Senior Counsel, Suit, Suit, Decree, Reliance, Mrutunjay Pani & Anr, Narmada Bala Sasmal & Anr, Kumar v. Government of India & Ors, Suit, Suit, Reliance, Reliance, Suit, Learned Counsel, Bank, Suit, Court, Act.10, Bank, Defendants 3 and 4, Suit, Bank, Suit, Bank, Suit, CPC, Suit, Suit, Bank, A.S. No.67, the Plaintiffs in Execution Appeal, CPC, Act, CPC, Suit, L.K. Trust, EDC Ltd., Court, Court, Rukmini Amma & Ors, Ext, Court, Gajaraj & Co. & ors., Court, Nirmala Industries, CPC, the High Court, ANR, RESPONDENT(S, Bench, VINOD LAKHINA].

DATE: 2763-2764, 2008, 1999, 2002, Rs.10,000/-, 15.03.1979, 1987, Rs.50,000/-, 12.08.1985, 20.08.1985, 30.09.1985, 1994, 1997, 1997, 1997, 1999, 1882, 1987, 1967, 30 years, 1965, 2000, 1987, 2007, 1994, 1994, 1987, 1991, 1994, the Defendant No.2 to 4, 1997, 1997, 1997, 1999, 1987, 1987, 30 years, 1999, 2011, 2013, 30 years, the day, nearly 30 long years, 2015, 1990, 1983, 10-11-1981, June 19, 2017 1, today

PRODUCT: Allokam Peddabbayya, Ac 1-34 cents, LRs

PERSON: Appellant(s, Defendant No.2, Defendant Nos.3, Defendant Nos, O.S. No.96, Order XXXIV Rule, Defendant Nos.3, Defendant No.2.4, Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, Order XXXIV Rule 1, Mangru Mahto, Mademsetty Satyanarayana, G. Yelloji Rao, Shivdev Singh, Sucha Singh, Sri Kailash Vasudev, Defendant No.2, Mhadagonda Ramgonda Patil, B. Arvind, Order XXXIV CPC, Order XXXIV CPC, Shri Vasudev, xxx xxx xxx, Defendant No.2, Order XXXIV Rule 1, Madamsetty Satyanarayan, Defendant No.2, O.S. No.96, Defendant No.2, Order XXXIV Rule, Narandas Karsondas, Rajeswary, P.K. Unni v., Mrutunjay Pani, Mangru Mahto, Order XXXIV, Ramgonda Patil, J.(Navin Sinha, G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Bijoy Kumar Jain, Mukti Chaudhry, Navin Sinha, Ranjan Gogoi

GPE: Guntur, AS No.65 of, Guntur, Gorantala village, Guntur, O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., O.S., India, held:-"9, Nagubai, Mhadagonda, New Delhi

ORDINAL: Second, Second, second, first, third, second, first, first, third, third

NORP: Pawan

MONEY: 7 Section 60

FAC: Embassy Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

WORK_OF_ART: B. Arvind Kumar

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //