Surendra Trading Company Vs. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Ltd

Decided On : Sep-19-2017

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 9, Section 9, Chapter II, Section 7 of the Code, Section 5(7, Section 8, Section 5(2, Section 9, section 8, section 8, the Civil Appeal No.8400 of 2017 & Anr, Section 9, Section 8, Section 8, Section 9, Section 9(5, Section 9, section 7, section 9, section 10, section 7, section 9, section 10, section 9, Section 15(1, Section 22(1, Section 15(1, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, Section 9, Section 9(2, Section 252, Section 61, the IB Code, the Civil Appeal No.8400 of 2017 & Anr, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, the Companies Act, Section 9(5, Section 9, Section 64(1, Section 7 of the Code, Section 9, Section 10 of the Code, Section 16(1, Section 16, Section 22, Section 12, Section 33, Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 1, section 7, section 9, section 10, section 7, section 9, section 10, Rule 1, section 7, section 9, section 10.43, section 7, section 9, section 10, the Civil Appeal No.8400 of 2017 & Anr, Section 9, section 7, section 9, section 10, Section 12, Section 9, Section 12, Section 9, Section 7 or Section 10, Section 7, Section 9, Section 10, Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 1, Section 7, Section 9, Section 10

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, NCLAT, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, mandatory?.”3, Civil Appeal No.8400 of, the Adjudicating Authority, The Adjudicating Authority, Provided that Adjudicating Authority, Authority, NCLAT, NCLAT, under:“43, Apex Court, NCLAT, the Adjudicating Authority, Petition, Respondents, the Adjudicating Authority, NCLAT, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, an Operating Agency, OA, Civil Appeal No.8400 of, the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Limited, Civil Appeal No.8400 of, Rs.17,06,766.95 p., Certificate, Rainey Park Suppliers Private Limited, J.K. Singhania Group, NCLAT, the Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, Civil Suit No.225, the District Court, Civil Appeal No.8400 of, Court, Shiv Shankar Trading Company & Ors, Court, Court, Director(s, the Adjudicating Authority, inter alia, the Adjudicating Authority, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, NCLAT, NCLAT, the Adjudicating Authority, NCLAT, NCLAT, NCLT, IB (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, CP No.(IB)10/ALD/ 2017.13, NCLAT, Court, NCLAT, NCLAT, NCLAT, NCLAT, Interim Resolution Professional, IRP, IRP, IRP, IRP, IRP, IRP, IRP, Resolution Professional (RP, IRP, RP, IRP, RP, RP, NCLAT, NCLAT, NCLAT, Court, NCLAT, Supreme Court, Adjudicating Authority, Apex Court, The District Magistrate, Monghur & Anr, AIR, Garbari Union Co-operative, Agricultural Credit Society Limited & Anr, Kumar Jana & Ors, Apex Court, Apex Court, Court, Supreme Court, Kailash Versus Civil Appeal No.8400, Supreme Court, Smt, CPC, Justice, Parliament, CPC, The Adjudicating Authority, Apex Court, NCLAT, NCLAT, Registry, NCLAT, NCLAT, NCLAT, Court, Nanhku & Ors, Court, CPC, CPC, CPC, Parliament, NCLAT, Appellant(s, Respondent(s, Adv, Respondent(s, Adv, Adv, M/s. Coac, A.K. Sikri, Bench, B.PARVATHI

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, Mill Mazdoor Morcha, Ghanshyam Sarda v., Ghanshyam Sarda v., Sashikant Jha, T.P.M. Sahir, Nomita Chowdhury v. The State of West Bengal & Ors, V. Swapan, Written Statements, Rani Kusum, Kanchan Devi, Kumar Sen v. State of, Blyth v. Blyth, AC643, Shreenath v. Rajesh, Order VIII, discussion:“44, J.(A.K. SIKRI, J.(ASHOK BHUSHAN, Appellant(s, Sunil Fernandes, Gaurav Kejriwal, Sujit Keshri, Kailash Chand, Satish Vig, Kanika Singh, R.K. Mohit Gupta, Sangram Singh Hooda, A.K. Sikri

DATE: NOS.15091-15091, May 01, 2017, the time of seven days, 2016, seven days, 2016, ten days, ten days, ten days, fourteen days, seven days, ten days, ten days, fourteen days, fourteen days, seven days, fourteen days, seven days, fourteen days, 32, the period of seven days, fourteen days, seven days, the 7 days, 7 days, 7 additional days, 16th February 2017, 1985, the year 1994, December 16, 1994, 32, the years 2001, 2002, 2003, October 24, 2004, the year 2007, May 28, 2016, January 06, 2017, 16.02.2017, 32 28.02.2017, 28.02.2017, 2017, 2016, a period of, six months, 2015, 2014, 2016, 2017, 21.03.2017, 2016, 21.03.2017, 2016, 2016, 2016, 2013, 2016, seven days, fourteen days, 16 of 32 days, fourteen days, thirty days, seven days, thirty days, this thirty days, the period of, 180 days, 180 days, 90 days, 180 days, fourteen days, 2003, 1966, 1999, 1997, the period of, 90 days, 1908, 2005, 30 days, 90 days, 34, 2005, 1975, 1966, 1966, 1998, 14, fourteen days, fourteen days, fourteen days, the period of, seven days, the 7 days, 7 days, 180 days, another 90 days, 180 days, the period of, seven days, seven days, seven days, fourteen days, 180 days, up to 90 days, 32, fourteen days, fourteen days, seven days, seven days, seven days, the period of seven days, 2005, 90 days, seven days, SEPTEMBER19 2017, 22835/2017, today

WORK_OF_ART: Diary No.22835, Written Statements by Defendants

CARDINAL: 2017.2, 5, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 3, 3, 32, 4, 5, 2, 2, 4, 4, 32, 2, 6, 5, 1, 5, 32, 2, 2, 3, 5, 5, two, 2, One, 6, 32, 2, 2, 5, 5, two, 7, 43, 4, 5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 8, 32, 9, 32, SICA.11, 10, one, 11, 32, 14.02.2017, 28.07.2016, 12, No.1, No.1, One, No.2, 13, 32, 1, 18.11.2016, more than 100, 14, 32, 15, 32, 5, ten, 17, 32, 5, One, 18, 32, 19, 32, 8, 144, 1, 33, 1, 20, 32, 4, Three, 6 SCC705, 21, 32, 1, 13, 1, 2, 4, 22, 32, 5, 5, 4, 1, 5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 23, 32, 5, 5, 5, 4, 24, 32, 5, 25, 32, three, 26, 32, 27, 5, 4, 28, 32, 29, 32, 4, 30, 5, 5, 4, 31, 32, 19

FAC: entirety:“9, Rainey Park, Rainey Park, Kailash Versus Nanhku

PRODUCT: manner:“51, No.1, Order No.25/2/2016- NCLT, No.1, No.1, Rule 1 Order 8 CPC

GPE: OA, Kolkata, Kanpur i.e., Kailash, under:“46., NEW DELHI

ORDINAL: first, first, first, Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, first, First, third, first, second, first

NORP: P.T. Rajan Vs, AIR1998SC1827