Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Indian Young Lawyers Association Vs. The State of Kerala

Decided On : Oct-13-2017

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 32 of the Constitution of India, Section 4, Section 2, Section 2, Section 3, Section 3, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 31, Act 7 of 1965, Section 3, Section 9, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, article 25, Article 14, Constitution, Article 25(2)(b, Article 290-A of the Constitution, Article 26(b, Article 26, Article 25, Section 4, Constitution, Constitution, Article 26(b, Section 4, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 25 of the Constitution, Article 25(1, Article 25(2, Article 25(2)(b, Article 25 or, Article 26, Constitution, Constitution, Section 3, Section 3 of the, Section 3 of the, Article 25, Article 32 of the Constitution, Article 25, Constitution, Article 25 and Article 26 of the Constitution, Article 25 and Article 26(b).24, Article 32 of the Constitution, Articles 15, Constitution, Article 25, Article 26 of the Constitution and, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article 25, Article 290-A of the Constitution of India, Constitution

CARDINAL: 1, 10 to 50, 51A(e, 3, 3, 4, 4, 1, 2, 1, II, 5, 3, 3, 5, 42 6, one, 10 to 50, one, 7, 1, 10 to 50, 2, 26, 3, 8, 10 to 50, 9, 1, 2, 26, 3, 10, 11, 13.11.2007, 05.02.2016, 11, 9, 26, 14, 16, 13, 1, 3, 26, 16, 26, 4, 9, 18, 26, 26, 18, millions, 10, 2, 51A, 12, 2, 9, 5, 8, 26, 16, 2, 17, 2, 8, one, 3, 5, 2, 23, 26, 25, more than 10, 26, between 10 to 50, 26, 23, 1, 1, 26, 27, 1, 26, 30, 15(3, 39(a, 51, 3

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, Young Lawyers Association & Ors, Petitioner(s, Kerala & Ors, Respondent(s, JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, CJI, the Government of Kerala, Dewaswom Board of Travancore, the District Magistrate of Pathanamthitta, the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, Authorisation of Entry, Hindus:- Notwithstanding, the Travancore Devaswom Board, the Cochin Devaswom Board, Drunken, the High Court, Travancore Devaswom Board, Thiruvananthpuram, Sabarimala Shrine, the High Court, the State of Kerala, the High Court, The High Court, the Tavancore Devaswom Board, Board, the Travancore-Cochin Temple of Disabilities, The Travancore Devaswom Board, Board, The High Court, Court, the Devaswom Board, the Government of Kerala, the High Court, the High Court, Bramchari, Sasta, Aryankavu and Achankovil, the Travancore Devaswom Board, C.W. 1, again:-“43, the High Court, Sabarimala 9 Shrine, the Devaswom Board, Hindu Place of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry, the Travancore Devaswom Board, Sabarimala Shrine, Government of Kerala, the Devaswom Board, Court, Thiruvananthapuram, inter alia, Government, High Court, State, Petitioners, the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship, State, Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, State, Consolidated Fund, Durgah Committee, Sri Venkatramana Devaru & Ors, Ors, Anr5, Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala, Ors, The Government of Tamil Nadu, the High Court, the High Court, the Devaswom Board, Court, Bar, Court, Fundamental Rights, the Travancore Devaswom Board, Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala, National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India14, State, the Devaswom Board, State, Bennet Coleman & Co., Union of India, Sections 3 and 4, Act, State, State, Union of India, Union of India, the Devaswom Board, State, Kerala High Court, the High Court, Court, U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad, the High Court, Court, Union of India, the Travancore Devaswom Board, the Devaswom Board, Devaswom Board, Thanthries, Board, Board, the Hindu Religion, Board, Mandalam, Ayyappa, Reliance, Raja Bira Kishore Deb v. State of Orissa23, the High Court, Shri Lakhshmindra Thirtha Swamiar, S.P. Mittal v. Union of India, Court, Court, the Davaswom Board, the Devaswom Board, the High Court, State, Consolidated Fund of, Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry, Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorization of Entry) Rules, Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry, Dipak Misra

PERSON: No.373 OF2006Indian, Versus State, Thanthri, Articles 14, Sikh, namaskara mandapams, Ors1, S. Mahendran, Mandalam, Makaravilakku Third, Vishu, Articles 15, Yogi, Kulathupuzha, Puthumana Narayanan Namboodiri, Articles 15, Raju Ramachandran, K. Ramamoorthy, Raju Ramachandran, K. Ramamoorthy, R.P. Gupta, Jaideep Gupta, K.K. Venugopal, K. Radhakrishnan, Indira Jaising, V.K. Biju, Bench, Government Secretariat, R.P. Gupta, Sabarimala Temple, Madras, Sri Shirur Mutt2, Ajmer, Syed Hussain, Gupta, Indira Jaising, Sastri Yagnapurushadji, Muldas Bhudardas Vaishya, AIR1966SC111915, Sastri Yagnapurushadji, Sri Adi Visheshwara, Varanasi, Articles 14, Ors.8, SCC5488, K. Ramamoorthy, Articles 15, Ayyappa, Ayyappa, Raju Ramachandran, Sabarimala Sree Dharma Sastha Temple, Deoki Nandan v. Murlidhar9, Sri Radhakanta Deb v. Commissioner, Nar Hari v. Badri Nath Temple Committee11, Nar Hari, Shastri Yagnapurudasji, Ramachandran, Articles 14, Manoj Narula v. Union of India13, Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, SCC78822 Learned, P. Jagjivan Ram, others17, Ram Jethmalani, M. Nagaraj, SCC57418, Sanjay Singh, Atam Prakash v. State, Haryana, Jaideep Gupta, K. Parasaran, K.K. Venugopal, Makaravilakku, Sri Shirur Mutt, Tilkayat Shri, Gvindlalji Maharaj v. State, others25, Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. State, SCR15528 High Court, Articles 15, Subramanian Swamy, Tamil Nadu, Articles 14, Ayyappa Temple, Tamil Nadu, Articles 14, Bhushan

FAC: Sabarimala Temple, the Sabarimala 1 AIR1993Kerala, the Sabarimala Shrine, Sabarimala Temple, Sri Venkatramana Devaru, the Sabarimala Temple

GPE: Kerala, India, Jaina, the State of Kerala, The State of Kerala, Kerala, Sabarimala, Kerala, Sabarimala, Sabarimala, Sabarimala, Sabarimala, temple.41, Sabarimala, India, Sabarimala, Sabarimala, the State of Kerala, Kerala, Sabarimala, Sabrarimala, Sabarimala, Sabarimala, Sabarimala, A.S., Deekshitulu, Kerala, India, Gujarat, the State of Kerala, others16, S. Rangarajan v., Satyawati, Rajasthan, Bombay, others27, Articles 14, New Delhi

DATE: 1965, 1965, 1965, 15, 25, 1950, 1930, 1965, 1965, the age of 10, the age of 50, daily, every year, 25, the year, 41 days, the year, 25, 1965, the age of 10, the age of 50, 10 12, 13.11.2007, every year, the age of 10 and 50, 26, 2015, 1965, 12 15, 1950, 2 1954, 1962, 1958, the age of 10 to 50, 1965, 1965, 15, 25, 6 1997, 1996, 25, several centuries, 1981, 1952, the age of 10 to 50, 15, 17, 21, 38, others15, 2016, 2014, 2014, 2005, 21, 1972, 1989, 2011, 2006, 20 (2007, 1986, 41 days, the age of 10 and 50, 41 days, 25, 24 (1983, 1964, 25, 1965, 2014, 5 SCC7529, 15, 17, Articles 25, the age of 10 to 50 years, 31 5, 1965, 1965, October 13, 2017

MONEY: 1965 Act

NORP: Hindu, Hindu, Buddhist, Hindus, Hindus, Hindus, Hindus, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindus, S. Mahendran, Hindu, Hindus, amici, amici, Joint, Hindus, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindus, Hindus, Hindu, Hindu, Hindus, Hindu, Hindu, Rules, Rules, Hindus, Ayyappans

WORK_OF_ART: Travancore-Cochin Act XV, Acharya

ORDINAL: 3rd, first, 3rd, first

QUANTITY: 10 and below 50

PRODUCT: Articles 25, Articles 25, Rule 3, Notifications, Articles 25, Articles 25, Articles 25, Temples, Bench

LOC: Pampa river, Temple, Temple

TIME: late night

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //