Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd Vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (India ) Pvt Ltd

Decided On : Oct-25-2017

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Electricity Act, the Electricity (Supply) Act, section 62, Section 82, Section 86 of the Act, section 42, the Grid Code, section 79, Section 92 of the Act, Section 94, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Penal Code, Section 181 of the Act, section 92, The Regulation 85, Article 5 of the PPA, Article 5.2, First 12 Rs, Article 8 of the PPA, a Force Majeure Event, Article 5.2 of the PPA, Order No.2 of 2010, Section 151, the Regulations/Act, section 86, the Electricity Act, section 62, the Electricity Act, the Article 8 of the PPA, Section 86, Section 86, Regulation 85, Section 86, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 61 of the Act, Section 62 of the Act, Section 64, Section 86, Section 63, Section 62(4, Section 64(6, Section 86(1)(b, Section 86, Section 94, Section 92, Section 181, Section 92, Section 181(zp, Section 94, Section 94(1)(g, Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 181, Regulation 82, Regulations 80 to 82, Section 61(d, Section 64, Section 62, Regulation 85, Section 125, the Electricity Act, Section 100, the Civil Procedure Code, Regulations 80-82, the Supplemental Agreement, The Supplemental Agreement, Article 5.2 of PPA, Article 5.2 of the PPA, the Supplemental Agreement, the Supplemental Agreement, the Supplemental Agreement, Section 82 of the Act, Sections 86, the Electricity Act, Section 61, Section 62 of the Act, Section 64, the Solar Thermal Projects, Section 162 of the Act, the Electricity Act, Section 181 of the Electricity Act, Section 127, Section 86, the Electricity Act, Regulations 80 to 82, Section 151 CPC, Regulation 80, Section 151 of the Code, Section 151 CPC, Section 151, Section 151, Section 151, Section 151 of the Code, Section 151 of the Code, Section 151, the Supplemental Agreement, the Supplemental Agreement, Section 62, Section 62, Section 86(1)(b, Section 86(1)(b, the General Clauses Act, the Concession Agreement, Section 62, the Electricity Act, Section 94, the Electricity Act, Section 94

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Central Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the National Electricity Policy, the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, The Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Commission, the Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Government, Authority, the State Commission, Emphasis, A State Commission, State, the State) Electricity Regulatory Commission:”4, the State Commission, Section, State Commission, the State Commission, State, State, State, the Appropriate Commission, Appropriate, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, Appropriate, Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, Commission, The Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Sections 345, the State Commission, Section, The State Commissions, the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, Conduct of Business) Regulations, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Power Purchase Agreement, the Scheduled Energy/Energy, Commission, Solar, Solar Power Project, Solar Projects, Neither Party, Force Majeure, Party, the Power Producer, Legal Approvals, Project, Party, Force Majeure, Party, MW, Village Ajawada, Project, Location, the Land Registration, Location, Land Procurement, the Solar Power Project, Liquidated Damages, Liquidated Damages, Schedule Commercial Operation Date, Power Purchase Agreement, Court, Commission, the Department of Energy and Petrochemicals, Commission, Commission, Order, Commission, Commission, inter alia, Solar Power Projects, Solar Projects, Solar Power Projects, Commission, Solar Projects, State, State, Power Purchase Agreement, Commission, Commission, the Association of Solar Power Developers, Commission, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, the Appellate Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, State, Commission, TNERC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, CPC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Court, Invest Import, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Court, Commission, 29.1.2010, State, Commission, the Power Purchase Agreement, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Appeals, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, No.2315, Civil Appeal No.2542, Court, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Commission, Commission, the Solar Power Project, the Chief Electrical Inspector, MW Solar Power PV Project, MW, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, GETCO, The Appellate Tribunal, Commission, the Conduct of Business Regulations, State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Conduct of Business Regulations, the State Commission, The Conduct of Business Regulations, the State Commission, The State Commission, Commission, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, Commission, Commission, the Supreme Court, Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Commission, Court, the Appellate Tribunal’s, Court, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, Appellate Tribunal, Commission, Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Commission, Court, Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Commission, Court, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. EMCO Limited, Court, the Appellate Tribunal, PPA, Projects, the Appellate Tribunal, Commission, Emphasis, Commission, Court, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v., Tarini Infrastructure Limited, Commission, Commission, Commission, Court, A.P. TRANSCO v., Sai Renewable Power, the State Regulatory Commission, Clause 4.6 of PPA, Emphasis, Court, EMCO, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., EMCO Ltd., the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, Court, Emphasis, the Regulatory Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Sections 76, Commission, Commission, the Appropriate Commission, Authority, Appropriate Commission, Commission, the Appropriate Government, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Conduct of Business Regulations, the Conduct of Business Regulations, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Court, Appropriate Commission, Court, Commission, Commission, the Conduct of Business Regulations, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal or Commission, Commission, THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APEPAL No.6399, SOLAR SEMICONDUCTOR POWER COMPANY, Lordship, the State Commission, Tariff Order, the State Commission, Conduct of Business Regulations, Commission, Power Purchase Agreement, MW, Solar Power, SPV, SPV, Solar Power, the Scheduled Commercial Operation Date, the State 39 Commission, the Scheduled Energy/Energy, Commission, Solar, Solar Power Project, Solar Projects, GETCO, GETCO, Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, The Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, Tariff Order, Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, Solar Photovoltaic Power Project, MW, Commission, Solar Power Project at Rs.12.54, Commission, Solar, Solar PV Power Project, Commission, the State Advisory Committee, National Tariff Policy, Solar, Commission, the Tariff Order, THE STATE COMMISSION, the State Commission, inter alia, Gujarat Electricity Industry, the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Conduct of Business Regulation, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, The State Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, the Conduct of Business Regulations, the State Commission, Appellate Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tariff, the State Commission, Tariff Order, the State Commission, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Tariff Order, the Appellate Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the State Commission, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Learned Senior Counsel, the Supreme Court, Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, Tariff Order, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, Court, U.P. AIR1961SC218this Court, AIR, Court, AIR, Sons Sugar Mills, Ram Prakash Agarwal, the Power Purchase Agreement, Solar, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Committee, the State Commission, Commission, Scheduled Commercial Operation Date, Commission, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, the Chief Electrical Inspector, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Power Producer, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. EMCO Limited, Gujarat Urja Vikas, Tarini Infrastructure Limited and Others, Court, the State Electricity Regulatory Commission, KWH, Narmada Water Resources Department, State Electricity Commission, State Commission, State Regulatory Commission, the State Commission, Court, V.S. Rice & Oil Mills, A.P. AIR1964SC1781 K. Ramanathan v. State of, T.N., D.K. Trivedi & Sons v. State of, Supp, Court, Commission, Court, Sections 14, KWH, Court, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Solar Power PV, State, the Tariff Order, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, CPC, Commission, S. Nagaraj, Court, Learned Senior Counsel, Rs.16.50, MW, MW, MW, MW, MW, Court, MW, Tariff Order, State, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Tariff Order, Court, Commission, PVT LTD & ORS.Respondent(s, Adv, Adv, Adv, Respondent(s, Bench, Judgment, Judgment, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal or Commission, Commission, REGISTRAR

GPE: KURIAN, States, India, District Banaskantha, Gujarat, Ajawada, Shivlakha Village, the State of Gujarat, Gujarat, Junagadh, New Delhi, District Banaskantha, District Kutchh, District Kutchh, the State of Gujarat, Ram Chand, Gujarat, Karnataka, India, C.A., New Delhi

DATE: the 1st, 2003, 62, multi-year, 1948, 1998, 14 of 1998, one year, one year, any financial year, seven days, six months, 1908, 45 of 1860, 1973, 25.08.2004, 11, the period of, 25 years, monthly, 13th Years, Year to 25th Years, 31 st December 2011, December 2011, 29.01.2010, monthly, the end of this month, April 2010, 15, the end of April 2012, November 30, 2011, April 30, 2012, January, 2010, 31 December 2011, 31 December 2011, the day, 16, 1 November 2011, 29 January 2012, one month, as long as six months, 29 January 2010, paragraphs-24, one month, six months, 2003, 1981, 2003, 2013, 2013, 17.2.2012 and, 13.03.2012, 2010, April, 2012, 21, 2004, 2003, 2003, 2004, 2003, 2004, 2004, 10.12 22, 24 23, 2013, 40, 2016, 1270/2012, 2016, 16, 20 years, paragraph-21, January 2010, 31 32, 34 35.36, October 25, 2017, 2003, 29.01.2010, 29.01.2010, the period of, 25 years, monthly, First 12 years, 13th Year to 25th Year, 31st December 2011, 31st December 2011, 2003, one year, any financial year.7, two years, 28.01.2012, 29.01.2010 as two years, six months, 18-24 months, 29.01.2010, 1st 42, twelve years, the thirteenth year, 2003, 2008, 2012, 2012, 29 Jan., 25 years, first 12 years, 13 years, 25 years Rs, 2012, 29.01.2012 to 31.03.2015, 13.03.2012, nearly two months, 2010, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2004, 2003, 2010, 29.01.2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 30, 2013, twelve years, 49 18, 2010, 17.02.2012 and 13.03.2012, 29.01.2010, 27.01.2012, 29.01.2010, 29.01.2010 to 28.01.2012, 29.01.2012 to 31.03.2015, 2010, 2016, 2016, 35 years, 1985, 1986, 1898, 2010, 56, 2010, 29.01.2010, 27.01.2012, 2012, 2011, 27.01.2012, 29.01.2010, 2010, 2010, the 1st, 13.03.2012, 29.01.2010, the 1st, 2013, October 25, 2017, 10-2017, today

CARDINAL: 61, 64, 54, 2, two, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 64, 2, 3, one hundred and twenty days, 1, 4, 4, 5, two, 6, 3, 6, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 5, 2, 3, 7.8, 228, 346, 2, 2, 1, 1, 9, 82, 10, 5.2.GUVNL, 29.1.2010, 5, 31, 11, 13, 19.04.2011, 20, THREE, two, 5, 13, 10.05.2011, 2.3, 2.4, 2.3, 2.4, 30, 14, 13, 29, 27.01.2012, 15, 16, 17.18, 22.02.2012, 27.01.2012, 27.“24, 17, 10.7, two, 1, 151, 18, 1, 19, 4, two, two, 27, 20, 19, 20, 11.26, 21, 8.64, 1.48, 21.02.2012, No.2, 29.1.2010, 30, 11.28, 29.01.2010, 1)(f, 11.29.Moreover, 11.30, 22, 1, 10.12, 10.11, 23, 85, 25, 27, two, 1, one, 1, 11, 31-12-2011, two, two, 27, two, 2, 16, 36, 64, 2, 8, two, 28, 29, 2-3-2012, 29, 31-11-2011, 27, PPA(s, 29, 29, 1)(e, 30 30.31, 109, 1, six, 82, 1908:“151, 32, 34, 33, two, 35, 38.39, 36, 37, 38, 20, 10.03.2011.4, 31.12.2011, 29.01.2010, 2.4, 2.3, No.1, 40, 94, 41, Rs.5, 9.28, 8.63, 8.03, 31, 31, 1 Apr., 31, 11.14, 10.36, 9.98, 7.00, 9.13, 8.35, 7.00, 7.00, 9.63, 43, ONE, 82, 80, 44, 28.01.2012, 45, 28.01.2012, 46, 47, 8, 219, 9, 533, 48, 31, 11, 17, 31.12.2011, 5.2, 2.4, 2.3, 50, 23.25, 14.07.2011, 5.3, 51, 27.01.2012, 11, 8, No.1, 3.29, 23, 4, 54, 17, 18, 2, 18, 21, 4, 23, No.1, 55, 1)(f, 28.01.2012, 4, 27.01.2012, 57, 20, 20, No.1, 58, 59, 6399/2016, 25, 60, Two, 61

PERSON: xxx xxx, Emphasis Supplied, Chairperson, Emphasis Supplied, Emphasis Supplied, Regulations, Emphasis Supplied, Regulations, Emphasis Supplied, Tariff Order, GERC, Emphasis Supplied, Law, Taluka- Tharad, Progress Reports, Tal-Bhachau, xxx xxx xxx, Emphasis Supplied, Emphasis Supplied, GERC, Emphasis Supplied, 02.01.2013, GETCO, Raj Bahadur Ras Raja Vs, Seth Hiralal, Ramji Dayawala Vs, Emphasis Supplied, 02.01.2013, Order, Order, Emphasis Supplied, Regulations, Emphasis Supplied, 02.01.2013, GERC, SCC74328, xxx xxx xxx, JOSEPH, JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, Kurian Joseph, Vehicle, Tariff Order, GERC, Tariff Order, kWh Rs, Levelized Tariff, Levelized Tariff, kWh Rs, kWh Rs, kWh Rs, Regulations, 02.01.2013, 02.01.2013, V. Giri, now.14, Vinod Seth v., Devinder Bajaj, Padam Sen v. State, Manohar Lal Chopra v., Seth Hiralal, Kanhayalal Bhargava, Gopi Krishan, Giri, Giri, Others, open.27, Jayant Bhushan, Giri, Giri, Giri, Kurian Joseph, SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O, Appellant(s, Hemantika Wahi, Puja Singh, Jesal, Shubham Arya, G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv, Wasay Khan, Filza Moonis, Adv, Kurian Joseph, R. Banumathi, Hon'ble Sh, Kurian Joseph, J., Justice R. Banumathi, Kurian Joseph

TIME: under this Act, 30.04.2010 to 27.10.2010 firstly, 19.04.2011 to 10.05.2011 i.e., 29.01.2010 till

FAC: Sections 193, Power Producer

QUANTITY: 9 xxx xxx xxx, 12 xxx xxx xxx, 8.2 Available Relief for a Force Majeure Event, 60 acres, another 105 acres, 8-9)“8

WORK_OF_ART: Rates and Charges, Regulatory Commissions, Regulation, The Preamble of the Act, Pending Interlocutory Applications

ORDINAL: first, first, second, Firstly, first, first, First, first, first, second, first, first, First, second, Second, first, Second, first, Second, second, first, first, second, first, Secondly, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

NORP: Dist, Rules, Rs.200, Rs.200, Rs.200, Rs.200

PRODUCT: Force Majeure, Para 5.2, paragraphs-12, no.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, rate.25, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1

LOC: Govt

EVENT: Regulation 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Regulation 80, Another 1993 Supp

PERCENT: 3%