Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Madiraju Venkata Ramana Raju Vs. Peddireddigari Ramachandra Reddy and Ors.

Decided On : Mar-21-2018

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 81, Order VI Rule 16, Order VII Rule 11, Section 83(1)(a, Rule 35, Rule 35, Section 33(6, the Election Petition No.8 of 2014, Section 125A(i, Section 36(4, Section 100(1)(d, Order VII Rule 11, Rule 11, Rule 11, Rule 11, Order VII Rule 11, Rule 16, Order VII Rule 11, Order VI Rule 16, Order VII Rule 11, Order VII Rule 11, Rule 35, Chapter 5.20.1, the Election Rules, Section 100(1)(d)(i, Act 43 of 1951, Section 100, Section 125 A(i, Section 84, Section 100(1)(d)(i, Section 101, Section 83(1)(a, Section 83(1)(a, Order 7, Rule, Section 81(1, Rule 7(1, relies.‖ 17, Order VII Rule 11(a, Order VI Rule 16, Section 83 of the Act, Rule 11, Order 7 of the Code, Order 7 Rule 11(a, Section 83, the RP Act, Order VII Rule 11(a, Order XIV Rule 2, Order VII Rule 11, Order XIV Rule 2, Order VII Rule 11, Order VII Rule 11(a, Order XIV Rule 2, Order VII Rule 11, Rule 35, Chapter 5.20.1, Section 100(1)(d)(i, Article 19, Section 36, Section 125-A, Article 19(1, Constitution, Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, Article 19(1)(a, Section 125-A(i, the RP Act, Order VII Rule 11, Section 100(1)(d)(iv, Section 100(1)(d)(i, Section 100(1)(d)(iv, Section 100(1)(d)(i, Section 86(7

CARDINAL: 1, No.1, two, two 3, two, 8, eight, No.1, 4, 6, six, two, 5, No.1, three, 100, 101, 6, 1, 10, 3, 8, 7, five, one, 9 to 11, five, 10, 9 to 11, 8, 10, 9, 4, 2, 9 to 11, 3, 11, one, two, two, 26, 4, 14, 8, 3, 14, 12, two, 5, 13, two, 2, 9 to 11, No.1, 14, two, No.1, two, only one, 15, 2, 9 to 11, 16, 5, 3, 1, 8, 15, 14, 14, 2, 18 9, 21, 26, 27, two, 3, 10, 3, 11, 1, 5, 8, 3, 2, 20, 16, two, 13, 21, 14, one, 22, 1, No.1, 2, No.1, 23, two, five, five, two, two, 11, 1, 10, 24, No.3, No.4, 16, 3, one, 4, 25, 5, 6, 8, 7, 26, 8, 9, 27, 27, 27, two, 10, 28, No.1, No.8, 7A, two, 11, No.1, two, 29, 11, 11, 1, two, 11, 1, 10, 284, 30, 20, 284, 31, 32, 30, 2, 36, 175, 12, 13, 1, 1, 112, 16, 33, 4, two, 23, 8, 1, 349, 37, 24, 2, 38, 25, 4, 3, 8-10, 16, 7, 40, 39, 3, 40, 40, 3, 3, 16 to 22, 2, 2, 43, No.1, two, 44, 11, 1, 10, 21.04.2014, 45, two, 3,00,67,680, two, 11, 1, 46, 26, 73, 6, 27, 4, 29, 47, 1., 29.2, 29.3, 29.4, 29.5, 73, 29.6, 29.7, two, 2, 9 to 11, 49, No.1, more than 2, one, 43, 23, only two, more than two, only two, 44, 9, 25, 1, 1, 22, only 17, 4, more than 20,000, 21,000, 54, 2, No.1, 55

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, Venkata Ramana Raju, the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh State Legislative 2 Assembly, the Punganur Assembly, the Election Commission, The Representation of the People Act, the Punganur Assembly, the Andhra Pradesh State Legislative Assembly, the Yuvajana Shramika Rythu Congress Party, YSRCP, the Telugu Desham Party, e. The Returning Officer, the High Court of Judicature, the State Legislative Assembly, CPC, High Court, the High Court, The High Court, Nandiesha Reddy Vs, Court, Court, the Conduct of the Election Rules, Returning, the Apex Court, the Apex Courts, the Election Commission, the High Court, The High Court, Civil Rule of Practice, the High Court, the Election Commission of India, Notification No.3/4/2012/SDR, the Election Commission of India, The High Court, the Election Commission of India, the High Court, the Election Commission of India, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, Court, Siva Kumar, Current Market Price, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, the High Court, EA No.329 of, The High Court, EA, the High Court, Court, the Election Commission, the Election Commission, the State Legislative Assembly, High Court, The High Court, The High Court, Court, Duni Chand Vs, State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.10, Kuldeep Singh Pathania Vs, RV Jankiraman & Ors.12, Asharaf Kokkur Vs, Singh & Ors.14, Ashok Sahu & Ors.16, US Rayudu & Anr, the High Court, L.R. Shivaramagowda & Ors, LRs & Ors, Shambhu Prasad Sharma Vs, Charandas Mahant & Ors.24, Hukumdev Narain Yadav Vs, K. Venkateswara Rao & Anr, Bekkam Narasimha Reddi & Ors, Hari Shanker Jain Vs, The High Court, CPC, Court, Order VI Rule, Court, the High Court, the High Court, High Court, the High Court, Andhra Pradesh, Returning, Civil Rules of Practice, Rule 4A of Election Rule, Income Tax, ―Approximate Current market, Apex Court, Conduct of Election Rules, Compendium Instructions, the Supreme Court, Court, the Government of India, Form-26, Oath, Magistrate of the First Class, Affidavit, the Election Commission of India, No.3/4/2012/SDR, the State Election Commissions, Court, Returning, Court, General Elections-2014, Compendium Instructions, Court, the Election Commission, the Election Commission, Punganur Assembly, ―Approximate Current market, Punganur Assembly, Apex Court, Election Commission of India & Anr, Representation of Peoples Act, State Legislative Assembly, the 284 Punganur Assembly, Court, the High Court, Court, Order VI, Bruce v. Odhams Press Ltd.32, Erle, Erle C.J.that Rule 4, CPC, inter alia, Court, Burton’s Legal Thesaurus, 3rd Edn, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, G.M. 35, Court, CPC, Court, V.S. Achuthanandan Vs, Court, Court, the High Court, The High Court, SCC23841, Court, the High Court, Court, H.K.) Ltd., Vessel M.V., Fortune Express, The High Court, the High Court, Civil Rules of Practice, Rule 4A, Court, Civil Rules of Practice, Total Income, Income Tax Returns, Court, Circular, the Representation of People Act, the Election Commission, Form-26, Column, Court, People’s Union for Civil Liberties Vs, Union of India,42, Applicable‖, Court, the Union of India, Parliament/Assemblies, People’s Union for Civil Liberties, the High Court, the High Court, no.1, Court, M. Prithviraj, Court, Court, Court, Dev Chandra & Ors.45, M. Prithviraj, Court, Court, Shambhu Prasad, the High Court, Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, no.1, the High Court, the High Court, EA, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Parliament, the High Court, Dipak Misra

DATE: 9466-9468, 2nd August, 2016, 2014, May, 2014, 1951, 12th April, 2014, 12th April, 2014, 17th April, 2014, 17th April, 2014, 21st April, 2014, the same day i.e. 21st April, 2014, 7th May, 2014, 16th May, 2014, 25th June, 2014, 2015, 1908, 2015, 2nd August, 2016, 81, 83, the 1st, 1 1986, 2009, 2001, 2011, the 1st, the 1st, para-10, para-11, 6 (2007, Serial No.2 of Item No.4, 24th August, 2012, 1st August, 2012, August, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2014, the 1st, the 1st, para-10, the 1st, the 1st, 2015, 2015, 10 (2014, 2017, 1999, 2015, 2007, 17, 2016, 2017, 45 days, June 2014, around a year later i.e. June 2015, 22, 20 1969, 1999, 2009, 2012, 2012, 1974, 1969, 2005, 2001, 2001, 16th May, 2014, 1961, The 1st Respondent, The 1st, the 1st, 21st April, 2014, 1st August, 2012, 2012, the last day, 24.8.2012, 1950, 1951, 2008, 1951, 21, 1994, 1887, 1960, 32 (1936, 1936, 36, 15, 1878, 133 35, 1908 34, 1838, 48, 72, 35, 1978, 21, 22, 36 (2013, 1999, 11, 2012, 1969, 2006, 2007, 1961, 1951, 2003, 48, 32, 1973, 50, 35, 51, the 44 (1995, 1955, 53 38, 10 and 11, 45 days, 2015, 2015, 2014, 56 six months, three months, March 21, 2018

PERSON: Peddireddigari Ramachandra Reddy & Ors, JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, Andhra Pradesh, Act‖, d. Appellant, g. Appellant, E.A. No.329, i. Appellant, Rajiv Gandhi,1 Ram Sukh Vs, Aggarwal,2 Pendyala, Pothula Rama, Hari Shanker jain Vs, Kavitha, Supp, Pothula Rama Rao Vs, Pendyala Venkata Krishna Rao, Rule, Kisan Shankar 10, Kisan Shankar Kathore, Item, Krishnamoorthy Vs, Item, P. Dwarakanath Reddy, G. Swarnalatha, accordingly.‖, Siddharth Luthra, Raju Ramachandran, Siddharth Luthra, Krishna Murthy, Bikram Singh Jaryal11, D. Ramachandran Vs, Virender Nath Gautam Vs, Kishan Shankar Kathore, Harkirat Singh Vs, Mohd, Akbar Vs, Sharathchandra Singh, Sri 16 Laxmi, Raju Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Pothula Rama Rao, Samant N. Balkrishna & Anr, George Fernandez & Ors.20, T.M. Chandrashekar, Ram Sukh Vs, Mangani Lal Mandal Vs, Bishnu Deo Bhandari23, Lalit Narain Mishra25, Harmohinder Singh, P. Dwarakanath Reddy, Shri V. Sreerami Reddy, Gazette, Affidavit, Affidavit, Peddireddigari Ramachandra Reddy, Mohan Rawale v. Damodar, Chitty, Peruvian Guano, Rules 2, Scott L.J.said, para38, Bullen, 1975 Edn, Cotton, Brett, ―I, Denman, ―72, V.A. Syed, Prasanna Kumar36, Bench, Kommuri Pratap Reddy,38, Pothula Rama Rao, Samant N. Balkrishna Vs, George Fernandez39., Singh Pathania, Mayar, Virendra Nath Gautam Vs, Singh, ,41, SCC10041, SCC61742, Rs.2,79,67,680, Paragraphs 25, Durai Muthuswami Vs, N. Nachiappan, Durai Muthuswami, Durai Muthuswami, Durai Muthuswami, Jagjit Singh Vs, Dharam Pal Singh, Narayan Sharma Vs, Mangani Lal Mandal, Karuna Shukla, L.R. Shivaramagowda, Harmohinder Singh, E.A. No.329, Mohd, Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud

NORP: J.1, Form-26, Form-26, Form-26, Rs.21,00,000/-.19, Form-26, Willians, Harkirat, Rules, Democratic, Vashist

PRODUCT: 2 & 9 to 11, No.1, No.1, No.1, 2 & 9 to 11, No.1, No.1, 2 & 9 to 11, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, no.1, No.1, No.1, 2 & 9 to 11, 2 & 9 to 11, 2 & 9 to 11, No.1, No.1, No.1, Rule 4A, Note-4, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, 2 & 9 to 11, No.1, No.1, No.1, no.1, No.1, Para 7A, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1

ORDINAL: 7th, second, second, First, second, third, first, first, 8th, second, 8th, 8th, 8th, 8th, 8th, third, first, 24th, fifth, 8th, firstly, secondly, 8th, 8th, first, second, second, first, first, third, second, first, first

GPE: E.A., Azhar Hussain, Resurgence Indias, Resurgence India, Pukhrem, later.15, Form-26, Form-26, Form-26, Resurgence India, Notary, Form-26, Form-26, Tatyaba, Peru, pp, Philipps v. Philipps33, L.J.said, M. Kamalam Vs, Pendyala, Kuldeep, Resurgence India, Assn, M. Prithviraj, Duni Chand, New Delhi

FAC: Resurgence Indias, Resurgence India Vs, the Gazette Notification, Resurgence India Vs, Ponnala Lakshmaiah Vs, the Column No.4

WORK_OF_ART: Notification, Mairembam Prithviraj Vs, Government Notification, Handbook for Returning Officer-2014, Immovable Assets, Acts, Rules, Orders, Model Code of Conduct for Guidance of Candidates, Current Legal Problems, The Column No.6, ―Approximate Current Market Price of…, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India

PERCENT: 3 SCC617Singh15, 13 SCC51116

EVENT: The Column No.4

TIME: 3.00 PM

LOC: Resurgence India, SCC73739, Resurgence India

MONEY: No.8, 51 & 52, No.8

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //