Manju Surana Vs. Ratan Singh

Decided On : Mar-27-2018

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 156(3, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 120B, the Indian Penal Code, Section 19, Section 197, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Section 19(1, the PC Act, section 7, Chapter, Article 356 of the Constitution, Chapter XV, Section 200, section 192, Section 202, section 192, section 200, Chapter XII, Chapter, Chapter XIII, Section 156(3, Section 5, the PC Act, Section 156(3, Section 190(1)(a, Chapter, Section 200, Section 202.However, Chapter, Section 156(3, Page 12, Section 156(3, Section 200, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Section 190, Section 190, Chapter XIV, Section 190(1, Section 200, Section 190(1, Chapter XV, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Chapter XII, Section 202, Section 156(3, Section 202(1, Section 156(3, Section 190(1)(a, Section 156(3, Section 156, Section 156(1, Section 156, Section 173, Section 202, Chapter XV, Section 202, Page 15, Section 202, Section 190, Section 156(3, Chapter 14, Chapter 12, Section 190, Section 156(3, Section 202, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Section 156, Section 155, the P.C. Act, the P.C. Act, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Section 19(1, the P.C. Act, the P.C. Act, Section 197, Section 190, Section 197, the P.C. Act, Section 19(3, the P.C. Act, Section 19(3, the P.C. Act, Section 19, the P.C. Act, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, the P.C. Act, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, the P.C. Act, Section 156(3, Section 19(1, the P.C. Act, Section 156(3, the P.C. Act, Chapter 14, Chapter 12, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Chapter XII, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Page 28, Page 29, Section 156(3

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, SLP, SLP, SLP, SLP, Jaipur Metropolitan City, Sections 7 & 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 468 & 471, FIR, the Superintending Engineer, Finance, Accountant General, Respondents, Government, Page 2, the Finance Department, Finance, Court, Sections 202 & 202, 30.4.2014, Special Leave Petition, the Central Government, State, the State Government, Magistrate, Court, the Central Government, State, the State Government, State, the Page 7, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Sessions, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, cases.-, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate.17, Court, Court, Emperor7qua, Magistrate, Legal Affairs, Magistrate, The Supreme Court, R.R. Chari12, Court, Sections 154 & 156, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Sections 190, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrates, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Sections 190, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, SEPCO Electric Power Construction, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Central Government, Court, I.P.C.27, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Cr.P.C., Bench, Bench, State, U.P., Magistrate, Bench, Magistrate, Magistrate, Additional Solicitor General, Ramdev Food, Magistrates, FIR, Magistrate, FIR, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Chapters 12 & 14, Magistrate, FIR, Magistrate, FIR, FIR, SLP, Bench, Special Leave Petition, Respondents, Magistrate, the High Court, Public Health and Engineering Department, PHED, PHED, PHED, Page 25, the Finance Department, Finance, PHED, PHED, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, PHED, Magistrate, Government, SLP, SLP, CRL

DATE: 2015, 2014, 1973, 30 3, 2018, 2014, 1988, 467, 1860, 2013, 1999, 10, 11, 2016, 30, years, 1951, 1964, 30 21, 1973, 1976, 14 & 17, 1977, 30 24, 1973, M.P. 161/2015, 30 38, 20.2.2018, 2015, today, March 27, 2018

PERSON: JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, the ‘Cr.P.C.’, Principal, M.K., M.K., P. Nallammal, Prashant Bhushan, Anil, Bhushan, Chapter XIV, Magistrate, Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Prashant Bhushan, Page, Bench, Gopal Marwari, J.in Superintendent, Abani Kumar, Magistrate, Gopal Das Sindhi v. State, Bench, Nirmaljit Singh Hoon v. State, Bench, Lakshminarayana Reddy v. V. Narayana Reddy14, Bench, Prashant Bhushan, XV, XV, Magistrate, XV, Tula Ram v. Kishore Singh15, Bench, Srinivas Gundluri v., Bench, Subramanian Swamy v. CBI17, Bench, Anil Kumar, M.K. Aiyappa18, Bench, Maksud Saiyed v. State, Paras Nath Singh20, L. Narayana Swamy, Bench, M.K. Aiyappa22, Tushar Mehta, Mohd, Para 8, Kishan Kaul

CARDINAL: 1.2, 1, 420, 8, 30, 20.4.2008, 4.2.2014, 30, 1, 10, 3, 6, two, 1, 13, 4, 9, 5, 30, 9, 190, 1, 2, 6, 2, 1, 11, 1, 1, 30, 12, 13, 8, 30“202, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 14, 9, 30, 1, 2, 3, 15, 1, 2).16, 4, 10, 30, three, 6, 11, 30, three, three, 9, 5, three, three, 13, 13, 3, 3, 13, 30, 199, 14, 30, two, 3, 30, 23, two, 4, 16, two, five, 155, 156, 16(2010, 8, 8, 17, 30, two, two, two, 18, 19(2008, 5, 18, 30, 20(2009, 6, 19, 30, 3, 2, 1, 30, 3, 30, two, two, 9, 21, 30, 156(3, 23(2015, 6, 1, 22, 30, 23, 30, 26, 27, 24, 30, only two, two, 26, 30, 9.5.2008, 27, 30, only one, No.1, 30, one, 30, 50.51, 30, 30

GPE: Jaipur, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., R.R., Das Gupta, West Bengal, P.C., P.C., R.R., Singh, P.C., P.C., P.C., under:“14, P.C., P.C., Cr, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., Suresh, Mohd, P.C., thereafter.36, Cr, P.C., India, P.C., P.C., P.C., New Delhi

ORDINAL: first, first, 8th, first, first, second, second, Secondly, first, second, second

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, No.1, 245 8, Yousuf v. Afaq Jahan25, Bench, Yousuf v. Afaq Jahan27, Bench, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1 - Para 4(iv, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, Bench

LOC: Anil Kumar, Anil Kumar, Respondent

NORP: L.

WORK_OF_ART: Complaints to Magistrates, The Constitution Bench, State of Gujarat23

TIME: under this Act, the minutes