Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dundappa Vs. Subhash Bhimagouda Patil and Others

Decided On : Mar-16-2017

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

LAW: Section 43 Rule 1(u, Article 5(3)(I, Section 35, Section 58, Section 33, Karnataka Stamp Act, Section 33, Section 34, Section 34, Section 35, Section 33, Order 41 Rules, Rule 28, Section 33

ORG: MSA, CPC, Hukkeri, the Judgment and Decree, O.S.No.57/2009, the Trial Court, Nos.4, the Judgment and Decree, the Trial Court, Nos.3, the Judgment and Decree, the Trial Court, O.S.No.57/2009, Specific Performance of Contract, the Trial Court, Nos.4, Nos.3, PW-2, Nos.3, Judgment and Decree, O.S.No.57/2009, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, ILR, the Judgment and Decree, ILR, ILR, Rs.2,30,000/-, PW-2, Rs.2,30,000/- plus Rs.20,000/-, ILR, Nos.3, Court, ILR, the Trial Court, Laxminarayanachar Vs, Narayan, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Trial Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, The Trial Court, Exhibits PI, the Trial Court's Judgment, Court, Court, Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, the Judgment and Decree, the Trial Court, the Judgment and Decree, Sannamallachari, ILR, Appellate Court, Court, the Appellate Court, CPC, Court, Court, Court, the Appellate Court, Exs, Judgment, the Trial Court, the Judgment and Decree, the Trial Court, Nos.3, Nos.3, the Trial Court, Nos.3, Nos.3, un, Nos.3, Nos.3, the Trial Court, Nos.3, Trial, Nos.3, Nos.3, Nos.3, CPC, Original Suit, Nos.3, Sections 33, the Judgment and Decree, the Original Suit, the Trial Court, the Judgment and Decree, the Judgment and Decree, the Trial Court, Nos.3, the Court of Civil Judge, Sankeshwar, Trial

DATE: 29.09.2012, 29.09.2012, 4, 25.10.2017, 15.11.2007, Rs.50,000/-, 05.05.2008., 15.11.2007, one year, 4, 4, 2 months, Rs.50,000/-, 4, 29.09.2012, 2007, 1127, 2003, 2426, 2006, 1984, 15.11.2007, that day, 2006, 2003(3, 2426, that day, 1957, 1984, 1969, 2000, 34, 35, 36, 37, 1957, P2, 2007, 1127, 1957, 4, 1908, 30 days, 90 days, 4, 09.04.2009, 28.10.2011, more than 2 years, 4, 4, two years, 4, 18, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, years, the year 2009, 4, 4, 1957, 4, 11/2012, 4, 13.04.2017, 3 months

GPE: R.A.No, R.A.No, Kamatnur, R.A.No, H.P.Basavarajappa Vs, Smt, Counsel, R.A.No

CARDINAL: 11/2012, 15.12.2011, 1, 11/2012, 15.12.2011, 2, 3, 5, 3., 5, 5., 2, 5, 3, 25.10.2007, 2, 2, 2, 6, 3 and 4, 2, 2, No.3, 2, 8, 2, 2, No.3, 4, 2, 5, 2, 9, 14, 2, 25.10.2007, 2, 2, 25.10.2007, 2, No.3, 4, 5.5.2008, 2, 5.5.2008, two, 2, No.3, 5, 2, 2, No.3, 4, 2, 2, No.3, 5, 2, 3, 18, 7, No.3, 5, 2, 11, 2, 3, 5, 15.12.2011, 12, 13, No.1, 3, 2, two, three, 3, 14, 2, 25.10.2007, 2, 18, 2, 15, 2, two, 16, 2, two, 5, 17, 18, 2, 299, 4, 41, No.6, 6, ten, 19, 20, 13, 21, 22, 24, 27, 23, 24, 5, 1, 5, 5, 5, two, 5, 17, 25, one, 5, two, 5, 26, 5, 27, 2, 5, 1, 5, 5, 28, 37, No.3, 5, 15,000/-, 5, Rs.15,000/-, 15.12.2011

PERSON: Sankeshwar, Hukkeri, Nos, Remand, Ex, K. Vijayalakshmi, Exs, Sanjeev, Nos.1, Exs, Savithramma R.C Vs, Kar, L.J. 55, Hon'ble Lordship N.Kumar, Sanjeev, K.N.Janardhanachari S/o. late, Lordship N. Kumar, Defendant Nos.3, Defendant Nos.3, para No.25, Ex, Ex, Ex, Defendant Nos.3, Hukkeri

WORK_OF_ART: this Miscellaneous Second Appeal, Judgment and Decree, Judgment and Decree, The Miscellaneous Second Appeal, The Judgment and Decree

FAC: Judgment, Rs.43,000/-, PW-4, PW-4, Shanthaveerappa S/o. Adigerahalli, Judgment

PRODUCT: Rs.20,000/-, No.1, No.1, Rs.20,000/-, No.1, No.1, No.1, Rs.20,000/-, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, Rs.20,000/-, Krishna Vs, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, P-17

QUANTITY: 1 acre 5, 1 acre, 1 acre 5, 2 acres 5, 1 acre 5, 1 acre, 1 acre 5, 1 acre

PERCENT: 15%

TIME: 9-13, 11:00 a.m.

ORDINAL: first, first, first

NORP: P-1, P-1, P-1, Rs.100 X 2, P-1, P-1, P-1, P-1, P-1, P-1, P-1, P-1, P-1, P-1

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //