Ashok Kumar Sethi Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai

Decided On : Jul-26-2016

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 260A, Section 260A, Section 132 of the Act, section 158BC of the Act, Section 158BFA, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 158 BFA, section 132, section 158 BFA(1, Section 158BC, Section 132B, the Income Tax Rule 112, Section 158BFA(1, section 132, section 132A, Section 158BC, Section 158 BFA of the Act, section 119(2)(a, section 158BFA(1, Article 136 of the Constitution, section 158BFA(1, section 158BC of the Act, Section 132B, section 158BFA(1, section 234A of the Income Tax Act, section 158BFA(1, the Income Tax Act

DATE: 1961, 29.5.2006, 22.6.2006, 1961, 29.5.2006, 10.1.2001, 16.4.2001, 1.6.2001, 16 days, 7 months, 29.5.2006, 2013, 10.1.2001, 16.4.2001, 1.6.2001, 16 days, year, 11.1.2001, every month, the month, the period of 30 days, 7 months, 120 days, 52, the 1st day of January, 1997, 158BC, every month, a month, the day, 158BC, every month, a month, 10.1.2001, 2002, 234A, 52, 2012, 2012

ORG: the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, Fixed Deposit Certificates, the Block Assessment Proceedings, Rs.1,20,55,160/-, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals, Coimbatore, Income Tax (Appeals, Coimbatore, the Income Tax Tribunal, Chennai, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals)/appellate authority, Tax Case (Appeal, Court, Standing Counsel, Block Return, IncomeIncome, Income Tax, Chennai, TNSC, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeals - II, Coimbatore, Income Tax, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Tribunal, Tribunal, Income Tax (Appeals, Income Tax (Appeals, Board, CCIT/DGIT, Tribunal, Income Tax Appeals, the Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Income Tax, J.P.Narayanaswamy, Taxmann.com, the Personal Deposit, State Bank of India, Deposit Account, Section 158 BC, Board, SC, Circular, Board, Board, Board, the Supreme Court, Board, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Income Tax v. J.P.Narayanaswamy, the High Court, Taxmann.com, Karnataka, Income Tax, ITR, the Delhi High Court, the Personal Deposit Account, State Bank of India, Bank, Such Personal Deposit Account, the Assessee/Appellant, Court, Legislature, Bharat Aluminium Co., Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc, Court, Parliament, the Appellate Tribunal

PERSON: Bench A, D. Krishnakumar, Bench A, Chennai Bench, A.S.Sriraman, T.R.Senthilkumar, Shivaraj, Assesseee, Roy

CARDINAL: 1.4.1990, 11.1.2001, 1, 11.1.2001, 2, 8.1.2002, 22.6.2001, 3, 26.2.2003, 4., 26.2.2003, 5, 6., Rs.5,98,75,340/- and 3031.5, 8.1.2002, 90,38,207/-Add, 15,36,495, 1,05,74,702/-Add, 158BFARs, 12,51,950/- 8, 9, 10, 8.1.2002, 11, 12, 1, 1, 2, 1, 13, 14, 5, 2014, 41, 15, 1, 16, 158, 17, 122, 234B, 234C., 18, 2014, 41, 17, 19, 254, 755, 20, 12, 112, 21, four, 22, 9, 552, 4, 64, 23, 24

GPE: Surcharage, No.68, Karnataka, Karnataka

PERCENT: 17%, 17%, 1 %

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, first

NORP: ITA, ITA

PRODUCT: 3,95,632/-Additional Towards, 158BC, ofNew Punjab, Patil

MONEY: one] per cent

LOC: Paragraph 17