Sagaya Arockiya Raj Vs. Ganesh Kumar

Decided On : Sep-07-2016

Court : Chennai Madurai

LAW: Section 138(c, the N.I. Act, Section 138(c, Section 138(b, the NI Act, Section 138 NI Act, Section 138, Section 138

PERSON: S. Vimala, Kumar Shailendra, Yogendra Pratap Singh v., Savitri Pandey, Ashok Hegde, Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State, Danapal Pillai

DATE: 2012, three months, 22.09.2012, 29.09.2012, fifteen days, 11.10.2012, 2012, 15 days, 2010, a period of, six months, thirty days, fifteen days, 15 days, 21.09.1989, 20.09.1989, 15 days, 15 days, 2014, 15 days, 15 days, the expiry of, 15 days, 15 days, 1994, fifteen days, fifteen days, fifteen days, fifteen days, the 15 days, August 25, 1994, 1994, 1993

ORG: Judicial Magistrate, the Central Bank of India, Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee, CCR 109, SC, the Karnataka High Court, Parliament, Parliament, this Criminal Original Petition

GPE: Dindigul, Dindigul, STC, Rajendran, Crl

CARDINAL: 2, Rs.6, 15.04.2012, Rs.6, 25.09.2012, 3, 4., 4.1, 10, 15, 6, 4.2, 9, 129, 38, 5, 6, 6.1, 17.06.1999, 15, 2077, 7, 8

PRODUCT: Section 138

WORK_OF_ART: No Payment