Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

A. Abitha Nachi and Others Vs. K.S. Saroja and Others

Decided On : Oct-20-2016

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 115, Order 3 Rule 2, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 8 Rule 10, Section 115 of the Code, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5 of the Act, Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code, Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, Order 8 Rule 10, Section 16, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Order 5 Rule 20, the Civil Procedure Code, Paragraphs 15 and 16, The Law of Limitation, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, section 5, Section 47, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 5 of Limitation Act, Order 9 Rule 13

ORG: NPD, VII Additional City Civil Court, VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, Civil Revision Petition, NPD, Civil Revision Petition, NPD, the Civil Revision Petitions, Sundaresan, the Civil Revision Petitions, the Civil Revision Petitions, Permanent Injunction, Court, M. Aydrouse, the Power Agents D.C. Sekaran, M. Aydrouse, the Power Agents, the Power Agents, Court, Court, the Power Agents, Court, the Power Agents, Court, The Power Agents, Court, the Power Agents, the Power Agent M. Aydrouse, Court, Chennai, Specific Performance and Permanent Injunction, Court, Court, the Civil Revision Petition, NPD, Court, Court, Court, Tata Engineering, Locomotive Company Limited, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Mercantile Bank Ltd., Bills, CTS 769, Gobardhan Sao and Others, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the High Court of Judicature, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Emphasis, Court, Time, Court, State of W.B. v. Administrator, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Time, Time, Court, AIR 1969, State, AIR 1972, CTC 342, The Motor and General Finance Limited, Court, CTC 785, Ravi Enterprises vs, Indian Bank, Court, CTC, A.P. Vedavalli),wherein, Court, CPC, Court, CPC, Court, Court, Tea Auction Ltd. Vs, Grace Hill Tea Industry, Supreme Court, Order IX Rule, Court, Order IX Rule, inter alia, Court, Court, CPC, The High Courts, Court, Decree, Court, the Appellate Court, CTC, Court, Suit, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Managing Committee, CTC, SC, Application, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, MANU/SC/0161/1988, MANU/SC/0322/1984 :, State, MANU/SC/0250/2005, MWN, SC, New India Insurance Co. Ltd., MANU/SC/0547/1975, Oriental Aroma Chemical Industries Limited, Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation, Court, Condone Delay Petition, State, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Oriental Aroma Chemical Industries Limited, Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation, Court, Court, Improvement Trust, MANU/SC/0487/2010, Court, Union of India v. Ram Charan, MANU/SC/0238/1963, AIR 1964, CTC 663, SC, MANU, CTC 286, SC, Applicant, CTC 220, Court, Court, CTC, Court, CTC, Court, Court, Wilkinson Sward, Court, Court, Decree, the Transferee Company - Gillette India Limited, Gillette India Limited, Court, Court, the Revisional Jurisdiction, the High Court, These Civil Revision Petitions, Court, Nahar Exports Ltd, the Apex Court, Appellant(s, Respondents, the High Court, Respondents, Respondents, Appellant(s, Respondents, Registry, Respondents, Appellant(s, Court, Court, Appellant(s, Respondents, Court, Court, the High Court, Vigilantibus, Respondents, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Civil Appeals Nos.8183, the Apex Court, Bench, the High Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 SC 361, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, CRP, NPD, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, H. Dohil Constructions Company Private Limited, Court, Court, the Civil Revision Petition, CMP, CTC 143, Court, Court, CPC, Court, E.P.No.21 of 2008, Court, Sub-Court, Court, CTC, Court, Bank, Court, Court, the EP Court, Court, Court, Honourable Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, CPC, CTC, Sri Pillaiyarpatti Karpaga Vinayagar Koil Nagarathar Trust, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, MANU/TN/0238/1986, Court, The Appellate Authority, Court, The Appellate Authority, The Appellate Court, Court, Chennai, Court, Central Chennai, Vide Document No.576, I.A. No.18953, the Execution Petition, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Civil Revision Petitions

DATE: 2015, 2013, 2011, 2013, 2011, 2015, 2014, 4, 2014, 2011, 2011, 2011, 28.08.2012, 5, 2013, 45 days, the first week of October, 2013, 2013, 5, 2013, 5, 2013, 2011, 2014, 157 days, 28.08.2012, 4, 2011, 28.08.2012, 2014, only 157 days, 157 days, Para 5, 2002, 1998, 883 days, 883 days, these days, 12, 1969, 1006, 1998, 2009, 30 days, 30 days, 2008, 2007, 714 days, 35, the year 1976, Rs.50,000/-, 1753 days, 2013, 2013, 1988, 1984, 2005, 2005, 1975, 2010, few days, the present day, 11, 2010, 2010, 2010, 1997, 1997, 2009, 2009, 2013, 2009, 2007, 2007, 1727 days, 11.04.2008, 11.04.2008, the month of April 2008, April 2008, May 2012, September 2007, 1727 days, only 9 days, 8184, 2013, more than seven years, 2008, 2008, one and half year, that day, one and a half year, 2003, 2016, 610 days, 2015, 2013, 2009, 2010, 2009, 48, 332 days, 14.12.2006, 25.1.2007, 12.6.2006, 332 days, 12.6.2006, 9.6.2007., 2003, the particular day, 14.12.1993, 2011, 28.08.2012, 2011, 2013, 14.02.2014, 2014, 157 days, 2011, the first week of October 2013, the first week of October, 2011, 28.08.2012, 2008, 4, 2013, 45 days, 2015, 04.04.2014. 18, 2013, the first week of October 2013, 28.08.2012, the first week of October 2013, the first week of October 2013, less number of days, the first week of October 2013, between first week of October 2013, 14.02.2014, the first week of October 2013

PERSON: Chennai, Common Order 1, this Common Order, V. Lakshminarayanan, D.C. Sekaran, V. Lakshminarayanan, AR.L. Sundaresan, AR.L. Sundaresan, Ram Nath Sao @ Ram Nath Sahu, J., Shakuntala Devi Jain v. Kuntal Kumari, Howrah Municipality(1972, Balraj Taneja, Sunil Madan, N. Balakrishnan vs M. Krishnamurthy, Shakuntala Devi Jain Vs, S. Durailingam, Alexander Lakshman, Kumar Gulecha, J. Vijayakumar, R. Thiagarajan, Esha Bhattacharjee v., Raghunathpur Nafar Academy, G. Ramegowda, Bangalore, O.P. Kathpallia v., Lakhmir Singh, Lipok AO, Shanti Misra, Paragraphs 10, Bench, Ludhiana v. Ujagar Singh, Balwant Singh, Jagdish Singh, MANU, Katari Suryanarayana, Koppisetti Subba Rao, S. Santhalakshmi, T. Indira vs R. Deepa, Enquiry, V. Lakshminarayanan, Jura Subveniunt, Lrs vs Exe, Jalgaon Medium Project, Mahabir Singh vs Subhash, Rajendran Gnanavolivu, D. Mariappan, Ravikrishnan, Ponneri, Ravikrishnan, Kumaresan, Ramanathan, K.S. Suresh, R.M. Sevagan, Guruswamy, Khalid A.K. Buhari, Khalid A.K. Buhari, Khalid A.K.

CARDINAL: 3, 5, 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 3, 3, 5, one, 7, 8, 3, 5, 3, 3, 9, 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 1, 2, 4, one, 10, 11, 1, 2, 4, 12, 2013(4, 9, 10, eight, 4, five, 7, 1, 10, 7, 123, 8, 9, 10, 8, 9, 10, 11, 11, 13, 11, 12, 1, 1, 13, 12, one, 1999(8, 30, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 3, 1, 4, 449, 33, 89, 10, 13, 11, 16, 13, 2015(1, 8, one, 14, 5, 547, 5, 20, 2, 142, 4, 66, 1, 166, 3, 752, 2, 840, 5, 459, 15, 16, half, 12, 10, 5, 459, Two, 11, 6, 786, 12, 8), 2, 7, 556, 4, 11, 183, 25, 26, one, 3, 4, 13, 4, 1, 26, 19, 13, 20, 1, 13.09.2013, 24, 17, 448, 19, two, 1, 8, 13, 1, 585, 15, 9.9.2016, 9, 1, 6, 30, one, 5, 14, 9.6.2007, 9.6.2007, 14, 2, 7, two, 14.3.1999, 7, 8, 14, 15, 03.06.2013, 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 4, 16, 1,2, 4, one, 17, 1, 2, 3, 5, 14.11.2013, 1,2, 4, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 14.02.2014, 14.02.2014, 1,2, 19, 20, 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 4, 21, 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 4, 22, 1,2, 4, 23

ORDINAL: first, 5th, first, 3rd, 5th, 5th, first, first, first, second, first, first, first, first, second, first, 5th, 3rd, 5th, 5th, 5th, 5th, 5th

FAC: Shantilal Gulabchand Mutha, Madras

GPE: Bombay, N.Balakrishnan v. M.Krishnamurthy, K.T.Thomas, Howrah Municipality, Counsel, Nagaland v., Cr., P.K., Ramachandran v. State, Kerala, India, Ramlal, Arukkani Ammal v.

PERCENT: 18.5%, 680 H. Dohil Constructions Co Pvt Ltd

EVENT: SC 575

PRODUCT: Decree, 811, 722(S. Janaki vs M/s Swetha Associates, 310, Order IX Rule, Revision, 717

QUANTITY: about 2.30 Acres

WORK_OF_ART: Judgments regarding Law of Limitation, the Law of Limitation, MANU/SC/0417/2010, Sufficient Cause, Sufficient Cause, the Receipt No. 73

NORP: N.P., Murali, Ravikrishnan

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //