Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/s. Shree Sakthi Modern Rice and Oil Mill, Partnership Firm, Rep. by its Partner, R. Chinnusamy, Mettupalayam, Erode Vs. R.Kalaimani, S/o.T.H. Ramachandran, Proprietor, M.R.K. Rice Corporation, Coimbatore

Decided On : Nov-14-2016

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 378(4, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 255, Section 138, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 255(1, Section 200 Cr, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 4, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 3, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 118, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138

GPE: Cr, P.C., Erode, P.C., P.C., Rs.8,60,000/-, Ex, Ex, Ex, Ex, Rs.8,60,000/-, Rs.1,00,000/-, Rs.1,00,000/-, Lawyer, Exs, Liability, Accused, Accused

DATE: 2012, 2012, 2012, 17, 1881, 1881, 2012, 1413, 14, 1881, the past several years, 29-12-2011, 15 days, 24.01.2012, 25.01.2012, the year 2005, 20.06.2009, '33172205681', 8 months, August 2011 to March 2012, 24, 33172205681, 24.03.2009, 24.03.2009, the past 3 or 4 years, 3 days later, 1881, 31, 1872, 1518, 33172205681, 2012, 35, 2012

ORG: the Court of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Fast Track Court, Erode, The Appellant/Complainant, Criminal Appeal, the Learned Judicial Magistrate, The Learned Judicial Magistrate, Erode, the Appellant/Complainant, inter alia, the Appellant/Complainant, the Appellant/Complainant's, the Judgment of Acquittal, Court, the Learned Counsel, Court, the Respondent/Accused, The Learned Counsel, Court, the Respondent/Accused, the Respondent/Accused, Court, Court, The Learned Counsel, Appellant, Court, Court, Exs, P.7, P.10, The Learned Counsel, Court, the Respondent/Accused, the Appellant/Complainant, Court, the Appellant/ Complainant, the Learned Counsel, Court, the Respondent/Accused, Court, Bank, the Respondent/Accused, The Learned Counsel, the Respondent/Accused, Discharge/Rebut, Court, the Respondent/Accused, the Learned Counsel, Exs, P.7, P.10, TIN, P.7, P.10, Ex, Court, The Learned Counsel, the Respondent/Accused, the Respondent/Accused, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR 1968, Supreme Court, Court, the Appellant/ Complainant, the Respondent/Accused, Stop Payment, Court, the Respondent/Accused, the Learned Counsel, Court, the Appellant/Complainant, Court, the Appellant/Complainant, the Respondent/Accused, the Respondent/Accused, Court, Court, No.041104, Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Cheque, IDBI Bank Ltd, Erode, the Appellant/Complainant, the Respondent/Accused, the Respondent/Accused, the Respondent/Accused, Court, the Respondent/Accused, the Appellant/Complainant, the Respondent/Accused, the 'Judgment of Acquittal', Court, Justice, Court, Appellant/Complainant, the Appellant/Complainant's Firm, the Respondent/Accused Company, the Respondent/Accused, Exs, P.7, P.10-Bills, the Respondent/Accused, the Respondent/Accused, the Respondent/Accused, Lawyer, the Respondent/Accused, P.7, P.10 - Bills, TIN, Exs, P.7, P.10, the house of Respondent/Accused, the Respondent/Accused, Exs, the Respondent/Accused, the Respondent/Accused, Karur Vysya Bank, the Respondent/Accused, the Statement of Account, the Respondent/Accused, the Cheque No.41104 of Sri Sakthi Modern, P.2, Drawer, TIN, TIN, the M.R.K. Rice Corporation, 3rd Street Saravanampatti Post, Coimbatore, M.R.K. Rice Corporation's, 3rd Street, Saravanampatti Post, Coimbatore, the Appellant/Complainant, the Appellant/ Complainant's, the Appellant/Complainant, the Appellant/Complainant, the Appellant/Complainant, the Appellant/Complainant, Bank, the Appellant/Complainant, Sri Sakthi Modern Rice, the Appellant/Complainant's, the Appellant/Complainant, the Appellant/Firm, the Appellant/Complainant's, the Appellant /Complainant, the Respondent/Accused, the Appellant/Complainant, the Appellant/Complainant, the Advocate Notice, P.4 Receipts, the Appellant/Complainant, M.R.K. Rice Corporation, Karur Vysya Bank, Holder, the Respondent/Accused, Drawer, 'Negotiable Instrument', the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR 2009, Supreme Court, Liability, Court, Liability, Liability, Holder of a Cheque', the 'Discharge of Debt, Liability, Court, Court, the Appellant/ Complainant, Court, the Appellant/Complainant, the M.R.K. Rice Corporation, the Appellant/Complainant, Exs, P.7, Exs, P.7, P.10, TIN, TIN, the M.R.K. Rice Corporation, Court, the Appellant/Complainant, the Respondent/Accused, Court, the Appellant/Complainant, the Appellant/Complainant, the Respondent/Accused, Court, the Judgment of the, Acquittal, Court, the Criminal Appeal, The Judgment of Acquittal, Court, Court, Court

CARDINAL: No.2, 27.05.2015, 1, 27.05.2015, No.2, 2, 27.05.2015, one, 118, 138, 1, 3, 27.05.2015, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 2, 3, 08.08.2011, 21.08.2011, 4, 30.12.2011, 16, 21.01.2012, 17, 18, 19, 27.06.2009, 20, one, 21, 22, 01.08.2011 to 31.03.2012, 30.12.2011, 13.12.2011, 7, 23, 30.12.2011, 53B, 35, 25, 53B, two, 22.03.2011, two, one, one, 19.04.2011, 19.04.2011, 26, 19.04.2011, 27, 28, 27.06.2009, 29, 30, 138, 139, 139, 118, 139, 32, 33, 34, 118, 139, 27.05.2015, 27.05.2015

PERSON: Case Cheque, Exs, Complainant, Law, P.16, Exs, Exs, Law, Appellant, Exs, Rice Mandi', Rice Mandi', Exs, Accused, Ex, Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar V. Mohamed Haji Latif, Exs, P.16, Exs, Law, Rs.8,62,550/-, Ganapathy, Cheque, Ex, Exs, Rs.8,62,550/-, Exs, D.2 Bills, Cheque, Exs, Exs, Rice Mandi', Exs, M.R.K., M.R.K., Kalaimani, Ex, P.16, P.16, P.16, Rice Mill, Payment Stopped, Sivanantha Puram, Sivanantha Puram, Oil Mill, Jaba Store', Jaba Store, Jaba Store, Rice Mandi, Exs, lorry, M.R.K. Kalaimani Rice Mandi, Kalaimani Rice Mandi, Exs, Law, Complainant, Kumar Exports V. Sharma Carpets, Rice Mandi', Rice Mandi', Aarisi Mandi, Exs

FAC: the Appellant/Mill, the Appellant/Complainant, Reply Notice, Reply Notice

WORK_OF_ART: Letter of Stop Payment', 'Stop Payment', D.2, D.2, Debt or Liability

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Proprietorship, Receipts, Debt, Debt, the Section 138, Debt, Debt, Debt

LOC: R.Kalaimani

TIME: 01.12.2010

NORP: Receipts

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //