Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

R. Shanmugam Vs. The Union of India Rep By The Secretary Department of Industry and Commerce New Delhi and Others

Decided On : Nov-28-2016

Court : Chennai Madurai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, section 9-A, the Explosives Rules, the Workmen Compensation Act, section 357(A

NORP: Mandamus, Dhanalakshmi

ORDINAL: 1st

CARDINAL: 1, 8, 10 00, 1, 2, 10, 11, 13, 25.10.2016, 2., three, three, 5, 3, one, 3, 26.11.2016, 4, 27,00,0003,07,50023,92,500 4

ORG: Rs.30, S. Nagamuthu, Court, Rs.30, Court, Court, the Additional Public Prosecutor, Court, the Judicial Magistrate, the Government under Section 357(A, Court, Special Government Pleader, the District Collector, Chitra (Mother) W/o., Chitra (Mother) W/o., Thirubuvanam3,00,00003,00,0008Sridhar S/o.VenkatachalamTmt, ChinnasamyThiru, Special Government Pleader, the civil Court, the civil Court

FAC: Olugacheri Village

GPE: Thanjavur District, Vanitha, R.C.C4/52589/2013, Keelatheru, Balakrishnan, Pudhutheru, Sammandam, Keelapuliyanthoppu

DATE: 26.10.2016, three years, today, 8, 28.11.2016, 28.11.2016, Today, week, a period of, one week, 5114/2016

MONEY: 5)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)1Ranjithkumar S/o.ShanmugamThiru

PERSON: Balakrishnan, Keelatheru, Selvakumar Keelatheru, Selvakumar Keelatheru, Sakunthala, Arivalagan, Karpagam, Valluvar Street

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //