K. Kannusamy Vs. T. Sumathi

Decided On : Jan-24-2017

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 19, the Family Court Act, Section 13(1)(ia, Section 13 of the Act, Section 13, Section 23, Section 13 of the Act, Section 13 of the Act, Section 13 of the Act, the Amending Act, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal

GPE: H.M.O.P.No.16, Erode, H.M.O.P.No.16, Erode, Naziyanur, New Delhi, B.Sc Degree, Srinagar, Jammu, Erode, Erode, Erode, Erode, England

DATE: 2014, 2014, 25.11.1998, about 4 months, 19.09.1999, H.M.O.P.No.149 of 2008, one year, 2008, 01.03.2010, 2010, 25.11.1998, H.M.O.P.No.149 of 2008, more than two years, 06.06.2015, tender years, H.M.O.P.No.149 of 2008, 28.08.2009, two years, 2010, 1955, less than two years, 1976, 1923, two years, at least two years, 1955

ORG: the Family Court, Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, the Family Court, Chemistry, Indian Air Force, Radio Communication Engineering, Sergeant, Subordinate Court, Family Court, Paragraph Nos.22, Family Court, Family Court, the Sub-Court, the Sub-Court, Family Court, Erode, Court, the Hindu Marriage Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, AIR 1994, SC, AIR 2009 SC 2254, the Apex Court, Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Parliament, Sub-Section, Court, The Apex Court, AIR 1988, Court, Court, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3., 4., 5., 6, one, 28.08.2009, 8, 9, 10, nearly as 22, 1, 2, 11, 12, 23, 22, 23, 13, 14, 15.The, 16, 1, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 1, 23, 1, 24, one, 25, 2, 451, 26, 1947)1, two, 27, 28

PERSON: S.Chandrasekharan, D.Selvaraj, Srinagar, Pavithran, Pavithran, Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, G.Chandrasekharan, Vishnu Dutt Sharma V. Manju Sharma, Naveen Kohli's, D.Selvaraju, J. L. Nanda vs Smt, Veena Nanda, Pulford, Pulford, Carpenter V. Carpenter

LOC: Kashmir, Cade Vs

PRODUCT: Rs.2,000/-, 710