Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Vs. Anita Kumaran

Decided On : Mar-01-2017

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 260A, Section 271(1)(c, the Income Tax Act, Section 57, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 57, Section 57 of the Act, Section 57, Section 271(1)(c, Section 133A of the Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 133A, Section 143(3, Section 271(1)(c, Section 14A, Section 14A, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 57, Section 57

DATE: 1961, years 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2396 of 2017, 2017, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 1961, A.Ys.2008-09, 2010-11, A.Ys.2008-09, 2010-11, A.Y.2009-10, 2008-09, 22.11.2013., three assessment years, 2010, 16.12.2003, more than 10 months, 14

CARDINAL: 19.06.2015, 442, 443, 1, 141, 2, 19.06.2015, 3, 4., 5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 29.04.2013, 31.05.2012, 5.5, 6.1, 6.2., 3., 4., 322, 158, 271(1)(c, 271(1)(c, 271(1)(c, 8., 9, 9.1, 9.2, 25.07.2012, 10, 10.1, 322, 158, 11, 2013, 38, 448, 12, 2013, 38, 448, 12.1, 9, 9, 13, 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, 2009(9, 589, 9, 10, two, 14.1, 15, 16

GPE: I.T.A.Nos.434, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, A.Y., Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee

ORG: the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, J. C.M.P.No.2395, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessment Years, Tribunal, A.Y.2010-11, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals -V, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessing, The Hon'ble Apex Court, CIT vs Reliance Petroproducts Pvt, ITR, Tribunal, Tribunal, Emphasis, Tribunal, Court, inter alia, the Accountant under Section 57, Tribunal, Reliance, the Tribunal on the judgment of, the Supreme Court, CIT V. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd., ITR, the Supreme Court, MAK Data, SC, the Supreme Court, MAK Data, SC, the Supreme Court, AO, Income Tax Returns, Emphasis, CIT V. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd., IPL, The Supreme Court, the Learned Counsel for Revenue, The Learned Counsel, Income Tax, Court, Court, Legislature, Emphasis, Tribunal

PERSON: Common Judgment, Rajiv Shakdher, Shri P. Radhakrishnan, Accountant, J.Narayanasamy, J.Narayanasamy, Delhi Vs, Mohan Bindal, Webster

ORDINAL: Secondly