Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Parrys Sugar Industries Limited, Bangalore Vs. Nil

Decided On : Sep-23-2016

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 391, the Companies Act, Section 391, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Scheme of Amalgamation Annexure - F, Section 393

GPE: C.A., 07.09.2016

DATE: 1956, 1959, 1956, 1956, 10.05.2016., parapraph-18, 06.06.2016, four weeks, two weeks

CARDINAL: 9, 1, 2., 4, 31.3.2016, 3., 13, 13,657, 19, only one, 6., 21, 34, 7., 8., 3, one, 9, 10, 11, 09.11.2016, 560 001, 30, 08.10.2016

ORG: the Companies (Court) Rules, the Chartered Accountants, the Board of Directors, Equity Shareholders, the Scheme of Amalgamation Annexure - F. 5, Preference, the Chartered Accountant, Preference, Sugar Development Fund, Bank Guarantee, Induslnd Bank, Iuduslnd Bank, Induslnd Bank, Sugar Development Fund, Central Board, Rs.32.40, the Sugar Development Fund, the Sugar Development Fund, Induslnd Bank, the Sugar Development Fund, Equity, Equity Shareholders, Equity

LOC: the Memorandum and Articles of Association

PERSON: Amar Kumar Dora, Chartered Accountant, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, V.Ramesh, V.Ravichandran, C.R.Rajan, Kannada, Udayavani

WORK_OF_ART: the Scheme of Amalgamation Annexure-E, The Hindu, Bangalore Edition, Bangalore Edition

TIME: 10.30 a.m.

FAC: Khincha Hall

NORP: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //