Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/s. Deluxe Cotton Corporation and Others Vs. Bank of Baroda

Decided On : Mar-18-2016

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 21, section 20, section 21, section 21, section 20, section 21, section 20, section 20, Section 21, section 19, section 21, section 20, section 21, section 19, section 21, section 21, section 21, section 21, Section 31, Order 41, Amendment Act 104, Rule 9, Order 41, section 21, section 20, Section 21, section 19, section 21, section 21, section 21, section 20, section 21, section 22, section 20, section 20, section 21, section 20(3, section 20, section 22

PERSON: M.S. Sonak, Jagtiani, Jagtiani, Jagtiani, Jagtiani, Jagtiani, Jagtiani, Jagtiani, Leatham, Ambica Quarry Works, Meerut, Jagtiani, Jagtiani, Shyam Sundar Sarma, Suresh Chandra Dey, Mela Ram, Nagendra Nath Dey, K.K. Porbunderwalla v., Sheodan Singh Vs, Mathew, Jagtiani, DRT, Jagtiani, Jagtiani, Dharminder Bhohi, Tasmat Uttistha Kaunteya, Arise, Partha

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 20, 21, 13, 29.10.2013)and, 308, 4, almost two to, 5, 20, 21, 6, 1, 2, 3, 1, 7, 21, seventy-five, 8, 9, 10, 15, 414, 1, 10, 241, 1, 203, 11, 12, 1, 8, 165, 13, 21, four, one, 15, 2, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 2)(g, 21, 1, 22, 23, 24, 15, 25, 26, 27, 15, One, 28, 29, Ten Thousand

DATE: 1993, 14 July 2014, 1009 days, 19 November 2013, 2494, 1999, 29177, 2013, 2014, 47, 26 days, 1009 days, 1353, 19 November 2003, about 18 August 2006, 26 days, 19 November 2003, forty-five days, forty-five days, 1901, 2013, 1987, 2015, 1997, 2005, 1952, 63, 14, 1987, 1976, 1009 days, only 26 days, 1009 days, 1353 of 1988, 19 November 2003, 19 November 2003, about 1009 days, a period of, 45 days, 45 days, 19 November 2003, 15 September 2004, 19 November 2003, only 26 days, 2010, about 948 days, the year 1999, 19 November 2013, about 1009 days, only 26 days, 14 July 2014, about 15 years, 2013, Rs.10,000/-, four weeks, today

ORG: the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, DRAT, Debt Recovery Tribunal, DRT, DRAT, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, AIR 1981, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank, Court, Dwarkadish Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., DRAT, DRT, DRT, DRAT, DRAT, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, DRAT, Tribunal, DRAT, the Division Benches, Court, the Madras High Court, Dwarkadish Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., M/s. Kasturi and Company, the House of Lords, AC, Hon, Supreme Court, Arasmeta Captive Power Company Private Limited, Lofarge India Private Limited, State of, State of Bihar, Hon, Supreme Court, Mittal Engineering Works, the Madhya Pradesh, Hon, Supreme Court, Court, Pannalal Jaiswal, Hon, Supreme Court, Hon, Supreme Court, Privy Council, Nagendra Nath Dey, AIR 1932, CIT, AIR 1956 SC 367, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Privy Council, CIT, Appellate, AIR 1966 SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, KLT 848, Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, DRAT, DRAT, Court, Suit No, DRT, DRT, DRT, DRT, DRT, DRT, DRAT, DRT, DRAT, DRT, DRT, DRT, DRAT, DRT, DRT, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Madhya Pradesh Matsya Mahasangh Vs, DRT, DRAT, DRT, DRT, DRT, DRAT, Standard Chartered Bank, DRT, DRAT, Court, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, DRT, DRAT, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, DRT, DRAT

GPE: Mumbai, O.A., Single, Mathuralal, Quinn, Gujarat, certan, Chagla, Thambi, R.P.A.D.

PERCENT: 75%, 75%

LOC: Chhitu

EVENT: the Civil Procedure Code

ORDINAL: second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //