Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Eros International Media Limited Vs. Telemax Links India Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Decided On : Apr-12-2016

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 8, the Arbitration Agreement, Section 11, The Arbitration Agreement, this Arbitration Agreement, this Arbitration Agreement, The Arbitration Agreement, the Arbitration Agreement, the Term Sheet, the Arbitration Agreement, the Trade Marks Act, the Copyright Act, Section 8, the Copyright Act 1957, Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, the Copyright Act, the Trade Marks Act, the Arbitration Act, the Copyright Act, Section 8, Section 8, the Arbitration Agreement, the Notice of Motion

DATE: 1996, 13th June 2012, 7, 8, March 2012, 13th June 2012, ten days, 1996, 13th June 2012, today, 10.Dr, Today, 1976, 2005, 2014, 21st November 2014).In, 4, 2014, 1999, 1999, 1957, 1999, today, 2003, 2013 1, 1996, 1996, 13th June 2012, a period of, eight weeks, today, a few weeks

ORG: Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Suit, Plaintiff, Telemax, the Plaintiff ( Eros, Telemax, Telemax, Notice of Motion, The Long Form Agreement, the Arbitration Agreement, Telemax, the Bombay High Court, Arbitration, Court, Arbitration, the Long Form Agreement, Telemax, Telemax, the Term Sheet, the Long Form Agreement, Telemax, Telemax, the Term Sheet, Eros, Arbitration, Arbitration, Suit, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Telemax, the Supreme Court, Hamilton Inc, SBI Home Finance Limited, AIR 2011 SC, AIR, Letters of Administration and Succession Certificates, Tulzapurkar s argument, Telemax, Telemax, the Supreme Court, Ors, Hirubhai Himabhai Patel, the Sole Arbitration, Court, Respondents, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, The Premier Automobiles Limited, Kamlekar Shantaram Wadke and Ors, a Civil Court, the Supreme Court, Managment Committee of Montfort Senior Secondary School, Steel Authority of India Ltd., Power Ltd., Court, Supreme Court, Practice of Arbitration and Conciliation, District Court, the Sale of Goods Act, Registrar, the Plaintiff s, a Civil Court, Plaintiff, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Sukanya Holdings, Madras High Court, R.K. Productions Private Limited v M/s. N.K. Theatres Private Limited, Sukanya Holdings, the Supreme Court, Sukanya Holdings, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Hon, Plaintiff, Suit, Plaintiff

CARDINAL: 1, 2 to 8, 1, 2, 2 to 6, 7 and, 8, 1, 1.5, 81).Preceding, 6., 7, 4, 13, 13, 13, 1, 2 to 8, 2 to 8, 8.To, 9, 20 to 24, 4, 368).The, one, 6, 7, 3, 4, 12, 11.Dr, 12.There, 13, 2 to 8, 14, 1, 7, two, 2097, 673, 1, 4, 15.Mr, 445, 16.Section 62, one, one, one, 62, 17.I, two, 19.Where, one, 20.Mr, 5, 16, 21.I, 22.I, 23.Not, One, three, 24.I, 2 to 8, 25.In, 1, 27

PERSON: Defendants Nos, Particulars, the Term Sheet, the Term Sheet, Eros, the Term Sheet, Eros, Term Sheet, Eros, Eros, Term Sheet, Defendant Nos, Term Sheet, Eros, Tulzapurkar, Booz Allen, V. H. Patel, Beedis, Beedi, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Defendants Nos, Dhond, Vijay Kumar, Automobiles, Dhond, Gupte J., Dhond, Gupte J., Booz Allen, Tulzapurkar, Dhond, O.P. Malhotra, Indu, Booz Allen, Dhond, Dhond, Tulzapurkar, Dhond, Petitioner, Booz Allen, Dhond, Dhond, V.H. Patel, Dhond, Dhond, Dhond, Dhond, Dhond, Dhond, Dhond, V. H. Patel, V. H. Patel, Dhond

NORP: Affidavits, Eros, Eros, Eros

ORDINAL: first

WORK_OF_ART: a Long Form Agreement, Summer Vacation

PRODUCT: the Sole Arbitrator

LANGUAGE: English

GPE: Mumbai, Mumbai, Chalisgaon, Ispat, Testamentary, Insolvensy

FAC: the Term Sheet, the Term Sheet, the Term Sheet, the Term Sheet, the Term Sheet

MONEY: three trade marks, 18.The Arbitration Act, three trade marks

LOC: Single, Single, Malhotra

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //