Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

National Securities Clearing Corporation Ltd. Vs. Prime Broking Company (India) Ltd.

Decided On : Jun-28-2016

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Chapter VI of the Petitioner's Bye-laws, Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 482, the Companies Act, Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Madras 364, Order 8 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 8 Rule 6, Section 176 of the Contract Act, Section 176, Section 176, Section 176, Madras 364, the Contract Act, Section 176, Section 176, the Contract Act, Section 102, Rule 28

CARDINAL: 1, 103.73, 2, two, 20,00,000, only 2,97,731, 20,00,000, 213.02, 16, two, 7, 13, 2,97,731, 17.03, 433, 434, 3, 55, 90.90, 4, 5, two, 153, 5, 8), 2, 231, 6, 8., 20,00,000, 20,00,000, 2,97,731, 2,97,731, 96,581, 83,954, 1,07,533, 9,673, 9, only 9,673, 20,00,000, 10, only 2,97,731, 939, 5, 122, 12, 16, 11, 12, 1, 157).Mr, 939, 13, about 100, 14, 55, 90.90, 152.57, 15, 20,00,000, 16, one, 3, 21, 94, 369, 1962, 406, one, 17, 20,00,000, 18, 176, 19, 20, 2,97,731, 20,00,000, 20,00,000, 20,00,000, 20,00,000, 21, 20,00,000, 17.03, 22, more than one, 17.03, 23, 5, 122, 12, 16).In, 151)has, 12 to 16, 12, 176, 6, 278, 176, 13, 14, two, 217, 15, 176, 176, 2(7, 176, 126, 148, 172, one, 16, 20,00,000, 20,00,000, 5, 122, 12, 16, 20,00,000, only 2,97,731, two, 20,00,000, 20,00,000, 25, 20,00,000, 2,97,731, 13,00,000, 7,00,000, 20,00,000, 26, 17.03, 20,00,000, 20,00,000, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 1, 157).Mr, 40,000/-, 175,000/-, 2, 197, 1, 34, more than one, 1, 157, 3, one, 3, 30, 30, 3, 2600, 2, 231, 36, 3, two

ORG: the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, National Stock Exchange of, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, the Petitioner's Bye-laws, the Futures and Options, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company's, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Circular, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Gitanjali Gems Limited, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Sarvin Mercantile Pvt. Ltd., Trusha Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., TRUSHA, the Respondent Company, TRUSHA, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Additional Commissioner of Police, EOW, the Respondent Company, EOW, EOW, TRUSHA, Petitioners, EOW, CrPC, the Respondent Company, EOW, Court, Criminal Application No.483, CrPC, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Respondent Company, the Bombay Stock Exchange, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, SAT, SAT, the Supreme Court, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Suit being Suit (L) No.939 of 2013, Court, the National Stock Exchange of, the Respondent Company, Suit, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company [Suit, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Court, Company Application, the Respondent Company, NACL, BSE, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Court, the Respondent Company, Bank Ltd v/s, Sundaram Multi Pap Ltd., Union of India v/s Raman Iron Foundry, the Respondent Company, the Company Petition, a Civil Suit, Suit, Suit, the Respondent Company, Suit, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, ABG Shipyards, Alok Industries, Flexistuff Industries, Gitanajali, EOW, EOW, CrPC, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Suit (L) No., the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, AIR, the Respondent Company, CPC, Suit, Plaintiff, Suit, Court, the Respondent Company, Court, Suit, Court, the Court of Appeal, Re Portman Provincial Cinemas Ltd, the Respondent Company, Suit, Suit, Court, Suit, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Company Petition, a Civil Suit, Circular, Circular, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company's, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Company Petition, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Suit, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Suit (L) No.939 of 2013, the Company Petition, Suit, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, EOW, the Respondent Company, Company, Court, Company, Company, Court, the Supreme Court, M/s Madhusudan Gordhandas, Co. v/s Madhu Woollen Industries Pvt Ltd., See Re Tweeds Garages Ltd., the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, EOW, the Respondent Company, Gitanjai, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Company Petition, EOW, Petitioners, EOW, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Court, the Respondent Company, EOW, the Respondent Company, S. L. Ramaswamy Chetty, AIR, the Supreme Court, Court, State Bank of India v/s, Neela A. Naik, Sec, Bank, Bank, the Delhi High Court, Bank of Maharashtra v. Racmann Auto, AIR 1991, Bank, AIR, Reliance, Calcutta High Courts, Division Bench, Court, AIR 1947, Bank, Sec, the Fixed Deposit Receipts, Sec, Sec, the Sale of Goods Act, Sec, Bank, Sec, the Fixed Deposit Receipts, the Fixed Deposit Receipts, Bank, the Fixed Deposit Receipts, Plaint, Suit, Petitioners, the Respondent Company, S. L. Ramaswamy Chetty, the Supreme Court, the Respondent Company, Petitioners, the Respondent Company, Petitioners, EOW, TRUSHA, the Respondent Company, TRUSHA, TRUSHA, Criminal Complaints, EOW, Petitioners, EOW, EOW, Petitioners, EOW, Petitioners, EOW, EOW, Petitioners, Petitioners, EOW, TRUSHA, Petitioners, EOW, CrPC, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, SLP, the Supreme Court, Petitioners, the Supreme Court, SLP, Petitioners, the Respondent Company, EOW, the Supreme Court, Petitioners, the Supreme Court, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Comprehensive Risk Management Framework, the Comprehensive Risk Management Framework, the Respondent Company, Risk Management, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Company Petition, the Respondent Company, Court, the Respondent Company, the Judgment of the Court of Appeal, Andhyarujina, Company, Company, Brick Industries Ltd., Court, Re Portman Provincial Cinemas Ltd, Company, Re Portman Provincial Cinemas Ltd, the Supreme Court, M/s Madhusudan Gordhandas and Co., the Company Petition, State Bank of Hyderabad Vs Varson Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Portman Provincial Cinemas Ltd., State Bank of India, Hegde, Golay, Court, the Supreme Court of India, Madhusudan Gordhandas, Co., Madhu Woollen Industries Private Ltd., the Company Court, Company, the Civil Courts, the Company Court, Court, Court, Hegde, Golay Ltd., Company, the Bank (See ILR, KAR, the Supreme Court, Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundary, the Respondent Company, M/s Madhusudan Gordhandas and Co., the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Marathi, Maharashtra Government Gazette, the Companies (Court) Rules, Court, Court, Court, Judgement, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Appeal, the Company Petition

DATE: 8th April, 2014, 17th January, 2003, 16th January, 2003, June 2012, September 2012, December 2012, March 2013, June 2013, March 2013, 2nd April, 2013, 2nd April, 2013, 3rd April, 2013, 2013, 28th June, 2013, 28th June, 2013, 1st July, 2013, 20th December, 2012, 1st January, 2013, 14th March, 2013, March, June, between 19th March, 2013, 22nd March, 2013, 19th March, 2013, 22nd March, 2013, 2nd July, 2013, 31st July, 2013, 28th June, 2013, 18th March, 2013, the period 19th March, 2013 to 22nd March, 2013, 23rd March, 2013, 24th March, 2013, Saturday, Sunday, 25th March, 2013, 23rd March, 2013, 27th April, 2013, 2013, 22nd August, 2013, 15th October, 2013, 17th October, 2013, 7th March, 2014, 30th June, 2015, 17th April, 2014, 1956, May, 2014, 13th June, 2014, May, 2014, June 2013, 31st July, 2013, 2nd September, 2014, 2014, the year ending 31st March, 2012, 30th September, 2013, 2010, 1974, 2013, the same between 14th March, 2013, 27th April, 2013, 14th March, 2013, the periods 19th March, 2013 to 22nd March, 2013, 19th March, 2013, 20th March, 2013, 21st March, 2013, March, 2013, 22nd March, 2013, 19th March, 2013, 27th April, 2013, 27th April, 2013, this date, 27th April, 2013, 2013, 2000, 1930, 1908, 1999, 20th December, 2012, 31st July, 2013, 2013, between the period 19th March, 2013 to 27th April, 2013, 1971, 21, between the period 19th March, 2013 to 27th April, 2013, 14th March, 2013, June 2013, June 2013, 1872, the period 19th March, 2013 to 22nd March, 2013, 27th April, 2013, 27th April, 2013 the, between 19th March, 2013 to 27th April, 2013, June 2013, June 2013, 19th March, 2013, 27th April, 2013, June 2013, 14th March, 2013, March April 2013, June 2013, between 19th March, 2013, 27th April, 2013, June, 2013, the June 2013, between March and April, 2013, June 2013, June 2013, June 2013, between 19th March, 2013, 27th April, 2013, June 2013, the year 1930, 1930, 2000, 1929, month, month, 24, between 19th March, 2013, 27th April, 2013, 2013, between the period 19th March, 2013, 27th April, 2013, 1930, 2000, between the period 19th March, 2013 to 27th April, 2013, 14th March, 2013, between the period 19th March, 2013 to 22nd March, 2013, March, 2013, Saturday, March, 2013, Sunday, 25th March, 2013, 23rd March, 2013, 27th April, 2013, 27th April, 2013, 22nd August, 2013, one day, 20 December, 2012, the year 2005, 23 February, 2005, 31 December, 2010, the 15th day of each month, the end of the month, 13th December, 2011, the month, 13th December, 2011, 12th September, 2012, 13th December, 2011, 18th June, 2012, 20th July, 2012, 22nd August, 2012, 26th September, 2012, 19th October, 2012, 20th November, 2012, 20th December, 2012, 21st January, 2013, 20th December, 2012, 13th December, 2011, 20th December, 2012, today, the day, 20th December, 2012, 13th December, 2011, 13th December, 2011, 20th December, 2012, 14th January, 2013, 16th January, 2013, 17th January, 2013, 1st February, 2013, 11th February, 2013, 12th February, 2013, 12th March, 2013, 13th March, 2013, 20th December, 2012, 1999, June, 1961, 1955, 1962, 1946, 1999, 1999, 1971, 1988, 1989, 1987, 2496, 1971, 1971, 1987, 1974, 1974, 1265, 35, 1971, 8th August, 2016, 1959, 1959, 7th July, 2016, 37, 2013, three weeks, today

PRODUCT: F, F, F, F, F, F and O, Lac, Respondent, Notification, F, F, Respondent, Circulars, Lac, Lac, Rs.10,000/-

PERSON: 3.77 Crores, Rs.94.78 Crores, Petitioner, Gitanjali, Petitioner, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Rs.94.78 Crores, Petitioner, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Petitioner, Petitioner, Gitanjali, Petitioner, Rs.103.73 Crores, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Rs.122.12 Crores, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Rs.3.71 Crores, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, Gitanjali, Petitioner, Petitioner, Gitanjali, Andhyarujina, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Petitioner, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Andhyarujina, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Andhyarujina, Petitioner, Gitanjali, Andhyarujina, S. L. Ramaswamy Chetty, M. S. A.P.L. Palaniappa Chettiar, Andhyarujina, Petitioner, Petitioner, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, Petitioner, Petitioner, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, Gitanjali, Andhyarujina, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Pawner, Pawnee, Tulzapurkar, Gitanjali, Tulzapurkar, Petitioner, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Andhyarujina, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Petitioner, Andhyarujina, Gitanjali, Andhyarujina, Petitioner, Pledgor, M. S. A.P.L. Palaniappa Chettiar, Nadkarni, Construing Sec, Doubt, Clara D'souza, Thali, FDR, Thali, Nadkarni, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Petitioner, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Petitioner, Gitanjali, Andhyarujina, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Andhyarujina, Petitioner, Petitioner, Tulzapurkar, Andhyarujina, Petitioner, Exh H-1, Andhyarujina, Denning M.R., Denning M. R., Bench, Denning M.R., Hannan, Russell, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, Denning M.R., Anr, Bopanna, J., Sundaraswamy, Andhyarujina, Navshakti, Gazette, Andhyarujina, Saraf

MONEY: Twenty Lakh

GPE: Gitanjali, SARVIN, Mumbai, SARVIN, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, England, Andhyarujina, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Pledgee, Bombay, Gitanajali, SARVIN, SARVIN, SARVIN, SARVIN, Gitanjali, India, India, M.R., India, A.I.R., S.C., India, M.R., A.I.R.

ORDINAL: first, 7th, 7th, firstly, secondly, first, secondly, Firstly, Secondly, first, first, Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly

NORP: Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali, Gitanjali

TIME: overnight

LOC: Pawnee, Madras

FAC: Vimal Chandra Grover, Bombay 471, Vimal Chandra Grover, EOW

EVENT: Madras 364

WORK_OF_ART: a Writ Petition, The Company Petition

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //