DLF Power Limited Vs. Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited

Decided On : Jul-20-2016

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 37, the Arbitration Act, section 16, the Arbitration Act, section 9, the Arbitration Act, section 16, the Arbitration Act, section 37, the Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, section 7, the Arbitration Act, section 2(1)(h, section 7, the Arbitration Act, Article 6 of the memorandum, section 4, section 8, the Indian Arbitration Act, section 7, section 7 of the Act, section 16, section 16(1, section 7(2, section 7(4, section 7, section 7(4, the Arbitration Act 1940, section 7, section 16, section 16, section 16, section 16, the Arbitration Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2, two, 3, 26.5, 3., four, 4., 5., two, two, 6., two, two, two, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 45, 13, 14, 15, 16, two, 17, 18, 19, 20, 19.1, 36.1, 36.1, two, two, 21, 37.1, 22, 23, 58, 2, 545, 20, 26, 2, 4, 7, 12, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 19.1, 29, 36.1, 30, 2, 31, 6, 32, 14, 33, 3, 8, 5, 83, 7, 33, 34, 2, 6, 14 to 19, 463, 463, 466, 5, 15, 20, 36, 7, 9, 37, 26, 610, 38, 39, 6, 40, 41, 42., 43, two, 16, 45, 7(4, 1, 12, 2, 1, 107, 3, 4, 50, 51, two, 2, two, 5, two, 56, two, 57, two, 59, 60., 61, 62, 19.1, two, 63, 7, two, two, 3, 1, 107, 26, 64, two, 65, 2, 66, 19.1, 67, one, 36, one, two, 1 and 2, 69, 70, 19.1, 71, 72, 1, 73, 74, 6, two, 75, two, two, 6, two, two, two, 80

ORG: the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, DLF Industries Limited, MW, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, Mangalore Refinery, DLF Industries Limited, the High Court, Haryana High Court, the Energy System Business, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Universal Limited, DUL, the Delhi High Court, Haryana High Court, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Universal Limited, DUL, DUL, DUL, DUL, DUL, DLF Industries Limited, DUL, DUL, BG No.43/2, DUL, DLF Power Limited, Eastern India Powertech Limited, the DLF Industries Limited, DUL, the DLF Industries Limited, Central Bank of India, Court, Court, Eastern India Powertech Limited, DLF Industries Limited, Reliance, Contract, Arbitrators, Umpire, Arbitrators, Reliance, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Universal Limited, DLF Industries Limited, the Court of Appeal, Reliance, Rajashan High Court, Aerens Goldsouk International Limited Company, Samit Kavadia and Ors, the Calcutta High Court, M/s.Bharat Spun Pipe Co., the Supreme Court, Khardah Company Limited, Raymon and Company, Private Limited, AIR 1962, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, Reliance, DLF Industries Limited, Reliance, the Supreme Court, M. Dayanand, A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited and Ors, DLF Industries Limited, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, M.R. Engineers and Contractors Private Limited, Som Datt Builders Limited, the Delhi High Court, U.P. Electricity Board, Reliance, King's Bench Division, Cottage Club Estates Limited, Woodside Estates Company, the Supreme Court, Indowind Energy Limited, Wescare, Court, Court, M/s.Patodia Ginning Factory, Arbitration Appeal No.40, the Court of Appeal, Baytur S.A., Finagro Holding S.A., Court of Appeal, DLF Industries Limited, Reliance, English Arbitration, the Court of Appeal, Baytur S.A., Finagro Holding S.A., Court, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Power Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, the Supreme Court, Kola Shipping Limited, AIR 2009, SC, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education And Research, Smita Conductors Limited, Euro Alloys Limited, AIR 2001, Trimex International FZE Limited, Vedanta Aluminium Limited, the Supreme Court, the DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, Court, DLF Industries Limited, Court, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, The Supreme Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Civil Court, The Supreme Court, Enercon, Reva Electric Car Co., the Supreme Court, Reva Electric Car Co., the Supreme Court, Today Homes and Infrastructure, Ludhiana Improvement Trust, Legislature, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, The Supreme Court, M.R. Engineers and Contractors Pvt, The Supreme Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Supreme Court, M.R. Engineers and Contractors, the Supreme Court, Indowind Energy Limited, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Board of Directors, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Universal Limited, the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, Baytur S.A., the Court of Appeal, Court, Pramod Chimanbhai Patel, Court, Court, the DLF Industries Limited, Court, Pramod Chimanbai Patel, the Delhi High Court, Owner and Contractor, The Supreme Court, Smita Conductors Limited, Euro Alloys Limited, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Smita Conductors Limited, the Supreme Court, Trimex International FZE Limited, Vedanta Aluminium Limited, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education And Research, the Supreme Court, Court, Ingram Micro India Limited, Micro Max Media Private Limited, Arbitration Application (Lodging, Court, Arbitration Petition No.76, POL India Projects Limited, Aurelia Reederei Eugen Friederich, GmbH Schiffahrtsgesellschaft and Company KG, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, The Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, Cottage Club Estates, Woodside Estates Co., Amersham) Limited, the DLF Industries Limited, the General Conditions of Contract, the DLF Industries Limited, the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, Khardah Company Limited, the Court of Appeal, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, the Supreme Court, Khardah Company Limited, The Rajasthan High Court, Aerens Goldsouk International Limited Co., MOU, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, Rajasthan High Court, Aerens Goldsouk International Limited Co., the Rajasthan High Court, Aerens Goldsouk International Limited Co., Calcutta High Court, Supreme Court, Khardah Company Limited, DLF Industries Limited, DLF Industries Limited, Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Bestech India Private Limited, Delhi High Court, Bestech India Private Limited, the Delhi High Court, Bestech India Private Limited, Supreme Court, M.Dayanand Reddy, Court, Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, Darwins Limited, Courthas, Industrial Limited, Court, Arbitration Petition No.509 of

DATE: 1996, 2nd February, 2011, 16th April, 1997 and, 30th April, 1997, 30th May, 1999, 23rd July, 1999, August, 1999, 18th April, 2000, about 19th October, 1999, about 14th December, 2000, 3rd January, 2001, 28th June, 2001, from 31st March, 2001, 2nd August, 2001, 20 days, 24th September, 2001, 24th September, 2001, October, 2001, 2nd December, 2003,, 29th November, 2004 and, 25th November, 2005, 28th December, 2002, 17th November, 2003, November, 2004, 29th September, 2005, 24th July, 2006, 8th March, 2007, three to six months, 25th September, 2004, 20th April, 2007, the month of May, 2007, 3rd January, 2001, the month of June, 2007, 27th July, 2001, a period of, six weeks, 20th June, 2008, 2nd February, 2011, 16th April, 1997, 1940, 1940, 30th April, 1997, 28th June, 2001, 28th June, 2001, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 1946, 54, 2008, 24, 1975, 8, 1810, 11, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 28th June, 2001, 28th June, 2001, 1993, 2014, 2009, 1280, 35, 2010, 17, 18, 20th April, 2016, 2015, 1992, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 44, 1996, 7(3, 46, 2009, 3730, 47, 48, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 49, 16th April, 1997, 1996, 1996, 52, 2012, 2014, 54, 16th April, 1997, 55, 1996, 16th April, 1997, 1996, 58, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 2001, 2010, 2009, November, 2012, 2012, 1996, 2012, 8th April, 2015, 1996, 1928, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 1942, 16th April, 1997, 16th April, 1997, 76, 1996, 1996, 16th April, 1997, 79, 2011, 2nd February, 2011, 16th April, 1997, four weeks

PERSON: Petrochemicals Limited, Haryana, Punjab, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Haryana, Andhyarujina, Contract, Contract, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Shayler, Woolf, Rajasthan, Setalvad, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Enercon GMBH, Anr, Anr, Anr, Patel, Lalit Constructions, Anr, Andhyarujina, Setalvad, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Unissi, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Green Mobil, Bench, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Shayler, Woolf, Shayler, Woolf, Shayler, Woolf, Universal Limited, Universal Limited, Delhi High Court, Heyman, Andhyarujina, Industrial Limited, Universal Limited, Universal Limited

ORDINAL: 7th, 1st, third, second, third, first, second, 5th

NORP: Punjab, Pramod, RUSSEL

GPE: Delhi, Skoda, Rs.523.84, Delhi, Enercon, India, C.R., QB, India, India, Enercon, Unissi

PERCENT: 2.5%

WORK_OF_ART: All England Law Reports, MANU/SC/0057/2010, Memorandum of Sale, the Memorandum of Sale

PRODUCT: Calcutta