Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Farida Aslam Khan and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others
Decided On : Jul-26-2016
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 482, Section 34, Indian Penal Code, Section 34, Indian Penal Code, Section 392, Section 392, Section 307, Section 307, Section 307, Section 307, Section 307, Section 307, Section 307 IPC, Section 307 IPC, Section 482, Section 307 IPC, Section 307 IPC, Section 307, Section 307, Section 307, Section 307 IPC, Section 307 IPC, Section 307 IPC, Section 307 IPC, Section 320 of the Code
ORG: Prakash D. Naik, State, Respondents, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, FIR, CR No.28, Dindoshi Police Station, Sections 392, Petitioners, FIR, CR No.28, Kanyapada, Dindoshi Police Station, Mangalsutra, the Police Control Room, FIR, FIR, CR No.27, FIR, Gajanan Estate, Smt, FIR, Dindoshi Police Station, CR No.28, CR No.28, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, Court, CR No.28, FIR, the Bombay City Civil Court, FIR, CR No.28, Dindoshi Police Station, FIR, CR No.27, Dindoshi Police Station, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, Smt, Smt, CR No.28, Smt, IPC, Smt, Smt, IPC, Smt, Smt, Smt, Smt, Petitioners, The Apex Court, IPC, Court, FIR, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, IPC, FIR, IPC, The Apex Court, the High Courts, IPC, the Apex Court, the High Court, FIR, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Sections 307, IPC, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the High Court, FIR, Court, Court, FIR, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, the High Court, FIR, CR No.28, Dindoshi Police Station, FIR, CR No.27, Dindoshi Police Station, Court
PERSON: Shailendra Mishra, Ankur Building, Rana Singh, Ankur Building, Rana Singh, Aslam Shekh, Aslam Khan, Farida Khan, Farida Khan, Farida Khan, Farida Khan, Saki Naka, Goregaon, Nilima Dalvi, Petitioner no.1, Nilima Dalvi, Farida Aslam Khan, Nilima Dalvi, Nilima Dalvi, Farida Khan, Nilima Dalvi, Farida Khan, Nilima Dalvi, Farida Khan, Farida Khan, Farida Khan, Singh, Gian Singh Vs, Bench, Gian Singh
CARDINAL: 2., 3, 448, 341, 506, 427, 452, 4, one, One, two, One, 5, 336, 354, 323, 6, One, one, 8., 9, 10, one, one, one, 11, 12, two, one, 13, 2012)6, 26, 26, 14, 15, 29.6, 29.6 Offences under, 16, 392, 2012)1, three, 61, 61, 17, two, 18
DATE: 1973, 2016, 2016, last five years, Rs.3.25, 12 January 2016, 2016, 2016, 2016, 12 January 2016, 12 January 2016, 2016, 2016, 2016, 2016, Rs.3.25, 2016, the same day, 16 March 2016, 2016, 12 January 2016, 2016, 12 January 2016
ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, first, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, first, first, first
PRODUCT: 323, Respondent, X2 and X3, Vs
GPE: Kanyapada, Goregaon, Mumbai, Goregaon, Mumbai, August-2012, January-2015, CR, Mohili Village, Mumbai, Dindoshi, Mumbai, CR, CR, CR, CR, CR, CR, CR
LOC: East, East, East
FAC: Ankur Building
WORK_OF_ART: Respondent in Writ Petition No.1936 of, Respondent in Writ Petition No.1937