Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Maulali Mehboobsab Nadaf and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra

Decided On : Jul-27-2016

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 143, Section 135, Section 3, Section 147 IPC, Section 148, Section 302, Section 323, Section 336, Section 337, Section 435, Section 427, Section 313, Section 300, Section 304(I, Section 302, Section 302 IPC, Section 149 of IPC, Section 149, Section 149, Section 149 IPC, Section 141 IPC, Section 149 IPC, Section 141, Section 147, Section 302 IPC, Section 149 of IPC, Section 323 of IPC, Section 324 IPC, Section 323 IPC, Section 323 IPC, Section 323, Section 336, Section 336, Section 435, Section 435, Section 302, Section 323, section 435, Section 323

PERSON: Anuja Prabhudessai, Solapur, Addl, vii, Vinayak Khatal, Vithal Gaikwad, Balasaheb Sarvagod, Balasaheb, Munna Pathan, Vithal Gaikwad, Vithal Gaikwad, Balasaheb Sarvagod, Shankar Bansode, Balasaheb, Shankar Bansode, Vithal Gaikwad, Vithal, w. Sec, Vithal, Subhashchandra Sardar, Subhashchandra Sardar, JMFC, Solapur, Shri Thorat, Vadla Chandraiah, Subhashchandra Sardar, Vithal Gaikwad, Vithal, Balasaheb Sarvagod, Vinayak Khatal, Shankar Bansode, Vithal, Vithal, Vithal, Balasaheb, Shankar Bansode, Dnyaneshwar Kamble, Rahul Khatal, Madhukar Gaikwad, Nandkumar Gaikwad, Chimma Kamble, Latika Shinde, Santosh Bhakumbe, Balasaheb Sarvagod, Vithal Gaikwad, Vithal, Balasaheb, Balasaheb Sarvagod, Rahul Khatal, Munna Pathan, Phiroz Pathan, Maulali Pathan, Vithal, Vithal, Vithal, Vithal, Balasaheb, Shankar Bansode, Balasaheb, Shankar, Vithal, Vithal, Balasaheb Sarvagod, Vithal, Kadamsing Dikkit, PW6 Rahul, Vithal, Vithal, Shankar Bansode, Dayanand Kamble, Vithal, Vithal, Balasaheb, Santosh Ghadkumbe, Madhukar Gaikwad, Nandkumar Gaikwad, Dnyaneshwar Kamble, Rahul Khatal, Latika Shinde, Balasaheb, Vithal, Balasaheb, Kadamsing Dikkit, Vithal, Vithal, Dnyaneshwar Kamble, Shankar, Vithal, PW9- Complainant Vinayak, Vithal, Balasaheb, Kamdsing Dikkit, Balu Sarvagod, Shankar, Vithal, Shankar, Balasaheb, Sanjay Bias, Vithal, Sardar, Vithal, PW7 Gajanan, Shrirang Bansode, Shrirang Bansode, Dilip Phansale, Addl, Bhim Nagar, Exh, Exh, Vithal, Subhashchandra Sardar, Kannda Swamy V/s. State, Anr, Vithal, Vithal, PW9, Vithal, Chidanand-, PW9, Balasaheb Sarvagod, Ravindra Rasal, Exh.89, Appeal No.765

ORG: Criminal Appeal No.765, Criminal Appeal, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, Panchsheel Nagar, Vitthal, Village Dahitane, no.1, no.1, Yunus Nadaf, Nos.1, Jodhbhavi Peth Police Chowki, the Civil Hospital, FIR, IPC, ACP Pansare-PW 14, ACP Pansare, CSFL, nos.2, JMFC, the Sessions Court, Counsel Shri Thorat, State of Bihar, State of A.P., APP, State, FIR, Exh.51, Dayanand Kamble, Dayanand Kamble, Village Vadje, Village Vadje, Dahitane, Kadamsing Dikkit, no.2, no.1, no.1, no.2, Panchsheel Nagar, Jodbhavi Peth Police Stn, FIR, Exh.51, FIR, Dayanand, FIR, Kadamsingh Dikkit, Kadamsingh Dikkit, FIR, no.2, Dahitne, Village Dahitne, Dikkit, Village Vadje, no.1, no.1, Court, Dahitne, Village Vadje, Village Dahitne, no.2, no.1, no.1, no.2, Vithal, Dahitne, the Village Fair Committee, Panchsheel Nagar, Dahitne, Dahitne, no.1, no.2, the sword (Art.39, APP, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, Dahitne, no.1, Babul, sword (Art.39, CA, Vithal, CA, CA, the sword (Art.39, no.1, CA, no.1, IPC, IPC, the Apex Court, Virsa Singh V/s. State of Punjab, AIR 1958, SC, Tamilnadu, the State of Andhra Pradesh V/s. Rayavarapu Punnayya, no.2, no.1, Vithal, IPC, IPC, IPC, The Apex Court, Kuldip Yadav, State of Bihar, JT 2011, SC, AIR 2011 SC, Court, the Apex Court, IPC, Exh.51, Vithal, Village Dahitne, FIR, CrPc, Vithal, Vithal, MLC, no.1, State, no.2, no.2, IPC, Suffice, IPC, Sections, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC

DATE: 2009, 3, 2009, 2009, 25.5.2009, 25, 1989, one year, three months, one year, three months, three months, one month, 10 days, one month, 10 days, two months, one month, one year, three months, one year, 1528, 2004, PW 13, 4, 15.5.2012, 2003, 2006, 2006, 13, 16, 8th May, 2004, 10.5.2005, 15.5.2004, 32, 2008, 1976, 35, 1736, 40, 42, 44, 2009, 2009, six months, six months, 15 days, six months, 30 days

CARDINAL: 2, 12, 2, 147, 148, 302, 307, 324, 336, 337, 435, 427, 25, 3(2)(iv, 3, 307, 324, 3, 135, 3(2)(iv, 147, 148, 302, 323, 326, 336, 337, 427, 435, 4., 5., 8.5.2004, 6., 2, 147, 148, 302, 307, 324, 336, 337, 435, 427, 135, 3, 25, 3(2)(iv, 8, 3, 1, 1, 8, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1/2, 1, 2, 1/2, 1/2, 3, 9, one, 3, 12, 10, 18, 11, 12, 3, 10, 10, 13, 14, 15, 8.5.2004, about 8 to 8.30 p.m., One, 17, 18, 8.5.2004, 19, 20, 8.5.2004, one, 21, 7.5.2004, 8.5.2004, one, 22, 8.5.2004, about 8.00 to, one, 23, about 5 to 7 minutes, 24, 8.5.2004, 25, 7.5.2004, 8.5.2004, 5.5.2004, 7.5.2004, 7.5.2004, 26, 27, 8.5.2004, 28, one, one, 10.5.2004, 29, 10.5.2004, one, 30, 107, 108, 31, three, 304(II, 12, three, three, 13, four, 3rdly, two, 33, 11, 4, 382, 34, II, 4, 436, 26, 36, 37, 38, 161, 148, 39, 79, 41, 4, 11, 43, 337, 337, 2, 2, 11, 11, 45., 11, 147, 148, 302, 323, 336, 337, 435, 427, 2, 2

EVENT: the Bombay Police Act, Bombay Police Act, Bombay Police Act, PW 11, SC ST Act

LOC: the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes, PI Ravindra-PW10

NORP: Rs.500/-each, Muslim, Exh.64, Revankoli, Vithal, Sanjay, Sanjay, Vithal, Vithal, Vithal, Vithal, Vithal

TIME: about 8 p.m., about 8 p.m., about 11 a.m., about 11 a.m., 8 to 8.30 pm, about 8.00 am

GPE: Vadje Village, Dayanand, Vithal, Vinayak, Vinayak, Hematoma, no.2, Solapur, Solapur, Cr, Vadje, Bhera, C.A., Vinayak, Vadje, Vadje, Vadje, PW9 Vinayak, no.3, no.4, Orchestra, PW9 Vinayak, Vadje, PW9 Vinayak, PW9 Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vadje, Dayanand, Vinayak, PW9 Vinayak, Vadje, CSFL, PW9 Vinayak, Vadje, Dayanand, Cr, no.3, no.4, no.3, Cr, P.C.

PRODUCT: Hanuman, no.1, Hanuman, no.1, no.1, no.1, PW9, Hanuman, Hanuman, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, CA, no.1, 465, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1

ORDINAL: 7th, First, Secondly, Thirdly, Fourthly

FAC: Maruti Temple at Dahitne, PSI Kadam

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //