Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Somnath Vs. Dipakbhai Chimanbhai Patel and Another

Decided On : Aug-22-2016

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

LAW: Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 129 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 129 of the Motor Vehicles Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3., 4, 6, No.2, 8., about 5', 9, Five

ORG: Appeal, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangamner, Court, Hospital, No.2 - Insurance Company, Court, Court, Court, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Rs.5,66,797/-, Respondents, Rs.5,66,797/-, the Petitioner - Somnath Thakaji Mandlik, Nationalized Bank

PERSON: Award, Appellant Somnath, Nasik

DATE: 8th October, 2014, 2011, 18th May, 2010, 1988, 1988, 29.01.2011, five years

TIME: about 08.00 p.m.

GPE: Pune, Rs.6,29,775/-, p.a., Rs.1,00,000/-

PERCENT: about 65%, 50%, 10%, 10%, 8%

PRODUCT: no.1, No.1

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //