Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Somnath Vs. Dipakbhai Chimanbhai Patel and Another
Decided On : Aug-22-2016
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
LAW: Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 129 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 129 of the Motor Vehicles Act
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3., 4, 6, No.2, 8., about 5', 9, Five
ORG: Appeal, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangamner, Court, Hospital, No.2 - Insurance Company, Court, Court, Court, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Rs.5,66,797/-, Respondents, Rs.5,66,797/-, the Petitioner - Somnath Thakaji Mandlik, Nationalized Bank
PERSON: Award, Appellant Somnath, Nasik
DATE: 8th October, 2014, 2011, 18th May, 2010, 1988, 1988, 29.01.2011, five years
TIME: about 08.00 p.m.
GPE: Pune, Rs.6,29,775/-, p.a., Rs.1,00,000/-
PERCENT: about 65%, 50%, 10%, 10%, 8%
PRODUCT: no.1, No.1
ORDINAL: first