Provincial Housings and Property Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Decided On : Sep-08-2016

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, section 3, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 12, Section 6, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3, Section 39, section 7, section 3, section 7, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: Colabawalla J. 1, Notification, Schedule, Notification, Village Juhu, J.R. Mhatre Marg, Juhu, Scheme, Notification, P.K. Singh, Petitioner, Notification, Balsara, Notification, Balsara, Notification, Respondent Nos.3, Balsara, Balsara, Balsara, Notification, Balsara, Notification, Articles 14, Balsara, Balsara, Wireless Station, Notification, Petitioner, Notification, Sharma, Petitioner, Juhu, Notification, Juhu, Notification, Notification, Wireless Station, Notification, Wireless Station, Schedule, Balsara, Notification, Notification, Petitioner, Notification, Notification, Balsara, Balsara, Exh, Notification, Balsara, Exh, Balsara, Notification, Sharma, Sharma, Petitioner, Juhu, Balsara

CARDINAL: 2., 3, 12, 669, 4., 5., 40, 19.20, 6., 225, 269, No.3, 7, 19.20, 19.20, 48, 48, 8., 19.20, 9, 48, 19.20, 10, 11, 15.24, 19.20, 43, 45, 12, 300A, 13, 14, 2, 15, 16, 17, 2, 18, 19, 2, 1, 3, 2, 20, 7, 2, 4, 4, 22, 23, 15.24, 15.24, 15.24, 19.20, 24, 19.20, 220, 19.20, 25, 53 to 66, 2, 26, 6, 27

ORG: SRO, the Government of India, Ministry of Defence (Respondent No.1, the Works of Defence Act, the State of Maharashtra, Letter of Intent, Division of Respondent No.2, the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, CTS No.11, the Juhu Wireless Station, the State of Maharashtra, Mora Saibaba Co-operative, Housing Society Ltd., the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, the Slum Rehabilitation Development, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, LOI, the State of Maharashtra, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, LOI, the Competent Authority, LOI, LOI, LOI, Condition No.55, Juhu, Defence Authority, Respondents, the Juhu Wireless Station, NOC, NOC, LOI, the Civil Aviation Authority, Respondent No.4, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Exhs, T-1, NOC, the Local Military Authority, NOC, the Petitioner to Respondent No.3, LOI, Court, LOI, Respondents, NOC, LOI, the Juhu Wireless Station, NOC, Court, Respondent Nos.1, the Works of Defence Act, the Wireless Station, this Wireless Station, the Wireless Station, the State Government, the Collector of Mumbai / MCGM / Revenue Department, Respondent Nos.1, NOC, the Wireless Station, the Writ Petition, the Works of Defence Act, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Wireless Station, the Wireless Station, the Wireless Station, the Juhu Wireless Station, the Central Government, the Juhu Wireless Station, LOI, NOC, Respondent Nos.1, the Wireless Station, Division, the Wireless Station, Respondent Nos.1 and/or 2, the Wireless Station, the Juhu Wireless Station, the Wireless Station, NOC, the Respondent Nos.1, the Competent Authority, the Juhu Wireless Station, Respondent Nos.1, the Wireless Station, the Wireless Station, Court

DATE: 19th June, 1976, 1903, 30th May, 2009, the year 1994, 11th October, 1994, the year 1995, 16th April, 1996, 11th May, 1996, 27th August 1996, October 1997, 6th July, 2006, 6th July 2006, 30th May, 2009, 55, 2/01/2009, 30th May, 2009, 4th July, 2005, 19th June, 1976, 19th June, 1976, 3rd June, 2013, 30th May, 2009, 19th June, 1976, 30th May, 2009, 19th June, 1976, 30th May, 2009, 4, 19th June 1976, 21, 1976, 1903, 19th June, 1976, 19th June, 1976, 19th June, 1976, 1903, 20th March, 1903, 21, 19th June, 1976, 30th May, 2009, 19th June, 1976

WORK_OF_ART: Condition No.55, Condition No.55, Condition No.55, Condition No.55, Condition No.55, Notification, Condition No.55

GPE: Mumbai, C.C., C.C., Mumbai, India, Sharma, Sharma, Sharma, India

QUANTITY: 500 yards, 500 yards, 500 yards, 500 yards, 500 yards, two thousand yards, one thousand yards, five hundred yards, 2000 yards, 1,000 yards, 500 yards, 500 yards, 500 yards, 500 yards, 500 yards, 500 yards, 500 yards

ORDINAL: 15th, second, third, Thirdly, Firstly, Secondly, Firstly, Secondly, Firstly, Secondly

LOC: Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, T-8, Respondent No.2, the Writ Petition, Exh

PRODUCT: Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.2, SRO 150, Respondent No.3

EVENT: 5th September 2009

NORP: Sharma, Sharma