Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Prakash Gobindram Ahuja Vs. Ganesh Pandharinath Dhonde and Others

Decided On : Oct-04-2016

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 52, Section 18, the Indian Registration Act, Section 52, Section 52, Order 39 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, the 157th Report of Law Commission of, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 18, the Registration Act, Cal 25, Cal 179, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, section 52, section 52, the T.P. Act, Rule 1, Order 39, section 52, the T.P. Act, Rule 1, Order 39, section 52, the T.P. Act, Section 52 of TP Act, Rule 1, Section 52, the TP Act, section 52, the TP Act, Section 52 of TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, section 52, the TP Act, section 52, the TP Act, section 52, Section 52, the TP Act, Rule 1, Section 52, section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 18, the Indian Registration Act, the TP Act, the Registration Act, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 2, the Bombay Amendment Act XIV, Section 52, Section 52, the Bombay Amendment Act XIV, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 18, the Registration Act, Section 52, Section 52, Section 52, Section 52 of TP Act, Section 52 of the Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Rule 10, Section 146 of the Code, Rule 10, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Rule 1, Section 52 of TP Act, section 52, Rule 1, section 52, section 52, section 52, section 52, section 52, Rule 2 A, Rule 11, Rule 1, section 52, section 52, section 52, section 52, Section 52, the TP Act, Rule 98, Rule 100 and Rule 102, Rule 98, Section 52 of TP Act, Rule 1, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 18, Rule 98 and 100, the Doctrine of Lis Pendens, Section 52 of TP Act, section 52, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, section 52, section 52, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 18, the Indian Registration Act, the Bombay Amendment Act, the Rule of Lis Pendens, Section 18(ee, the Registration Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, section 18, the Indian Registration Act, Section 2, the Bombay Amendment Act XIV, the Amendment Act, the Amending Act, Section 18, the Registration Act, Section 18 of the Registration Act, Section 17, Section 52, Section 17, the Bombay Amendment Act, the Bombay Amendment, Section 52 of TP Act, Section 52 of TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, Section 52, the TP Act, Rule 1, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 94, Section 94, Section 151 CPC, Order 39, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, Section 52 of TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Section 52 of TP Act, Section 52 of TP Act, Section 52 of TP Act, Section 52, the TP Act, Rule 1, Section 52 of TP Act, Section 52 of TP Act, Rule 11

PERSON: Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, R.C. Chavan, Tatoba Hargude, Bench, Kalyan, Sale Deed, Shankarrao Kadam, Chander Nikam, A.S. Oka, Jaganath Jawale, Arjun Yeshwant Dhanwatey, Anr, Jaganath Jawale, Pralhad Jawale, Sharad Jamnadharji Mor v. Arjun Yeshwant Dhanwatey, Nathaji Anandrav Patil v. Nana Sarjerao Pati, L.R., Paine, Metcalfe v. Pulvertoft, Sim, Pramatha Nath Roy v. Jagannath Kishore, Lal Singh Deo, Cal, L.J. 427, Muktakesi Dawn, Haripada Mazumdar, Nagubai Ammal, B. Shama Rao, Rajendra Singh Vs, Hadley v. London Bank, Kishorsinh Ratansinh Jadeja, Maruti Corporation, Sanjay Verma v. Manik Roy, Zubaida Khatoon, Nabi Hassan Saheb, Sarvinder Singh, Dalip Singh, Singh v. Jai Prakash University, Moti Lal v. Karrabuldin, Roy Chowdry, Rookea Begum, Dina Ram, Vijayalakshmi Leather Industries Vs, K. Narayanan, Rukhana Enterprises, Anandji Kalyanj, Pillai, Maya Nandan, Babiya Chaudhary, Sitaram Bhalchandra Sukhtankar, Abdul Salam v. Sheikh Mehboob, L.J. 277, Keshrimal Jivji Shah v. Bank, L.J. 893, Dinkar Dada Mahadik, Shrirang Dada Mahadik, Pramatha Nath Roy Vs, Jagannath Kishore, Lal Singh Deo, L.J. 427, Muktakesi Dawn, Haripada Mazumdar, Anr, B. Shama Rao, Rajendra Singh, Muktakesi Dawn, Roy Chowdhury, Order XXXIX, Kishorsinh Ratansinh Jadeja Vs, Sanjay Verma Vs, Manik Roy, Sarvinder Singh, Order XXXIX Rule 1, Order XXXIX, para No.30, Sanjay Verma, Anr, Anr, Order XXXIX, No.30, Anr, Farida Khatoon, Anr, Order XXII, No.30, No.30, No.30, Faridkot Vs, Baldev Dass, Kuttukaran Machine Tools Limited, facie, Order XXXIX, Order XXXIX, No.30, No.30, No.30, Reference 37, R.C. Chavan, No.30, Keshrimal Jivji Shah, N. Srinivasa, N. Srinivasa, Arun Mohan, Order XXI, Kumar Shaw, Kumar Shaw, Maharwal Khewaji, N. Srinivasa, Tatoba Hargude, L.R., Benches, Rules 1, Order XXXIX, Doctrine, Khan Vs, Cranworth L.C., Rajendar Singh, nihil innovetur, Dalip Singh, T. Bhup Narain, Nawab Singh, B. Sharma Rao, Emphasis Supplied, Emphasis Supplied, Order XXXIX Rule 1, Rule 2A, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXI Rule, Order XXI, Order XXXIX CPC, Transfer, Order XXXIX, Order XXXIX Rule 1, Order XXXIX Rule 2, Order XXXIX Rule 2, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule 1, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX CPC, Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC, Emphasis Supplied, Reference, Order XXXIX CPC, the Order XXXIX Rule 1, Order XXXIX Rule 2, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule 4, Order XXXIX Rule 4, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC, Order XXXIX Rule, Vareed Jacob Vs, Sosamma Geevarghese, Order XXXIX Rule 1, Nanak Builders, Dutt Maharaj Vs, Sukur Mohammed, Kedar Nath Lal Vs, Krishna Kumar Nag, Rajender Singh, T.S. Thakur, Vinod Seth Vs, Bajaj, wherein, Vinod Seth, Emphasis Supplied, A. Nawab, John Vs, V.N. Subramaniyam, Emphasis Supplied], No.43, Bell, No.53, Sanjay Verma, Anr, Order XXXIX Rule 1, Order XXXIX Rule 1, Order XXXIX, Order XXXIX Rule 1, S.C. Dharmadhikari, Order XXXIX Rules 1

ORG: Appeal, Court, Coram, Order XXI Rule, Court, Court, Dikkaya Muttaya Pujari, AIR 1980 Bombay 341, Appeal, Special Civil Suit, Respondent Nos.1, the Trial Court, Appeal, Kachhi Properties Vs, Court, the Apex Court, Kachhi Properties, CPC, Court, Court, Kachhi Properties, Kachhi Properties, Kachhi Properties, Sharad Jamnadharji Mor Vs, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Kachhi Properties, Appeal, the Trial Courts, Kachhi Properties, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Transfer of Property Act, Kachhi Properties, Kachhi Properties, Kachhi Properties, Suit, Appeals, the Trial Court, Single Judge, Sharad Jamnadharji Mor (Supra, the Trial Court, Sharad Jamnadharji Mor (Supra, Learned Single, Learned Single, Bellamy v. Sabine, Landon v. Morris, AIR, AIR 1956, SC, Jayaram Mudaliar v., AIR 2007, SC, Supp, AIR 2001 SCW, ILR 1898, MIA, Usha Sinha v., AIR 2003 Mad 203, Silverline Forum, Rajiv Trust, Ashoka Marketing Ltd., Anand Nivas Private Ltd., AIR 1965, ILR, AIR 1983, SC, L.J. 248, AIR 1988 Calcutta, Nagubai Ammal, AIR 1956 SC 593, Jayaram Mudaliar Vs, Ors, Learned Single, Judgment, the Calcutta High Court, Learned Single, Court, Legislature, Legislature, CPC, Para No.15, Court, Court, Maruti Corporation and Ors, the Supreme Court, Court, Supreme Court, Silverline Forum, Anand Niwas Private Ltd., Order XXI CPC, Learned Single, Dhurandhar Prasad Singh Vs, Jai Prakash University and Ors, Court, CPC, Learned Single, Learned Single, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Kachhi Properties, Court, Kachhi Properties, Kachhi Properties, the Apex Court, Court, the Special Leave Petition, Kachhi Properties, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Judgment of Kachhi Properties, the State of Maharashtra, Kachhi Properties, Legislature, Legislature, the State of Maharashtra, Kachhi Properties, No.14, Court, the Supreme Court, T.G. Ashok Kumar Vs, M.R. 462, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, Bank of Maharashtra and Ors, the Court of law confers, the Judgment of Kachhi Properties, Kachhi Properties, the Apex Court, Amit Kumar Shaw, AIR 2005, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Amit Kumar Shaw, Kachhi Properties Judgment, Court, Kachhi Properties, Court, Kachhi Properties, the Apex Court, Maharwal Khewaji Trust, AIR 2005 SC 104, the Apex Court, Court, the High Court, the Appellate Court, the Trial Court, Learned Single, N. Srinivasa Vs, the Apex Court, Court, Maharwal Khewaji Trust, the Trial Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Maharwal Khewaji Trust, Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, Civil Court, Court, Court, the Division Bench, Court, Clauses, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Amit Kumar Shaw, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, Civil Court, Court, Coram, Kachhi Properties, the Judgment in Pralhad Jawale, Kachhi Properties, Kachhi Properties, Kachhi Properties, Maharwal Khewaji Trust, Learned Single, Learned Single, CPC, Learned Single, Order XXXIX CPC, the Supreme Court, Single Judge, Courts, Kachhi Properties, the Court of the necessity, the Law Commission, the Law Commission, CPC, Pralhad, the Supreme Court, Court, Appeal, Bench, Court, Dikkaya Muttaya Pujari, AIR 1980 Bombay 341, the Judgment in Pralhad, Court, Rafique Barkatulla Khan Vs, Kachhi Properties, Court, CPC, the Apex Court, Court, the 157th Law Commission Report, Law Commission, Bacon, the Court of Chancery, Faiyaz, the Privy Council, English Court, Bellamy Vs, Turner, the Privy Council, Turner L.J., Bellamy, a Court of Equity, Jayaram Mudaliar, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Corpus Juris Secundum, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Jayaram, Court, the Apex Court, Jayaram Mudliar, Court, Hon, Supreme Court, Sarvinder Singh Vs, AIR 1957, the Supreme Court, Nagubai Vs, the Law Commission Report, The Law Commission, the Law Commission, The Law Commission, The Law Commission, State of Maharashtra, the Law Commission, Court, the State of Jammu, the Central Government, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, CPC, Court, Court, breach.-, Court, Court, Court, Order XXXIX CPC, Court, Consequence, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Order XXI Rule, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, CPC - Order, Court, Court, Bombay Amendment, Court, Kachhi Properties, Legislature, Court, the State of Jammu, Court, Court, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Corporation, Court, Court, Court, the Bombay High Court Amendment, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, CPC, Court, Court, Court, AIR 2004 SC, Court, Court, CPC, Court, CPC, Supreme Court, Thomson Press, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Privy Council, The Apex Court, AIR 1970 SC 1717, AIR 1967 SC 1440, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, Jayaram Mudaliar, Hon, earlier Judgment of Supreme Court, Nagubai Ammal, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR 1956, SC, Court, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, No.42 of the Judgment, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Jayaram Mudaliar, Bell, Commentaries, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, T.G. Ashok Kumar Vs, M.R. 462, Apex Court, CPC, CPC, CPC, Order XXXIX CPC, Court, Bombay Amendment, Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, Court, Court, CPC, the Principle of Lis Pendens, Court, Court, Coram, Court, CPC, Court, CPC, Bombay Amendment

CARDINAL: 100, 13, 2, 6, two, two, 6, 3., 4., 5, 6, 619, 5., 4, 6, 7, five, 8, 9, 10, two, 11, 12, 13, 14, 1, 4, 2, 1, 585, 4, 11, 197, 5, 2, 204, 6, 1832(5, 263, 16, 359, 1913(17, 9, 38, 593, 10, 220, 2, 200, 11, 240, 1973(2, 705, 12, 3, 13, 449, 11, 229, 14, 971, 2006(13, 608, 15, 625, 1, 191, 16, 5, 539, 17, 885, 6, 534, 18, 25, 19, 7, 323, 20, 2008(7, 144, 21, 22, 378, 3, 723, 23, 1, 24, 188, 414, 25, 43, 696, 26, 168, 27, 2006(3, 2, 28, 2004(4, 3, 29, 74, 15, 17, 25, 200, 705, 16, one, No.4, 4, 1, 17, 15, 18, 2009(11, 229, 608, 19, 102, transferee, 20, 2001(6, 534, 12, transferee, 21, almost 25, 22, 1, 23, 24, two, two, 25, 26, two, 27, pendens, 28, 29, 30, 4, 11, 31, 10, transferee, 2, 33, 34, 5, 182, 35, 24, 2, 30, 25, three, 26, three, 27, 38, 2, 39, one, 40., 41, at least three, 3, 732, 43, No.1, two, two, 2A, 11, 29, 339, 50, 51, one, 52, 6, 59, transferee, 729, 731, 55, transferee, transferee, 56, 57, 52, 1, 2, 1, 59, less than, less than, 60., 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 61, 11, 1, 1, 2, 2, 11, 1, 2, 15, 422, 1, 62, 100, 98, 1, 101, 2, 2, 100, 102, 63, 98, 100, 64, two, 65, 2(2, 66, 1(a, 67, 1, 69, 3, 3A, 5, 71, 6, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10, 10, 73, one, 74, 1, 75, four, 5, 397, 78, 147, 79, 80, 15, 81, 25, 25, 82, 593, 83, 42, 84, 7, 738, 85, 43, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 1, transferee, 92., 2, 2, 93., 2A, 2, 11, 94, 95, 2, 96, transferee, one, 97, 2A, No.2, 98.

GPE: Vasant, No.7, C.R., Sitabai, C.R., Pralhad, C.R., Single, Pralhad, C.R., Santa Singh, S.C.C., C.R., S.C., Lalitha, C.R., O.S., C.R., N.B., C.R., O.S., Santa Singh, Smt, Mumbai, Single, Single, Mumbai, Single, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Single, Single, C.R., Kachhi, Sharad, Kachhi, India, L.J., Singh, U.K., India, the City of, Mumbai, Mumbai, Ka, India, Proviso, Gouri

DATE: 2012, 28th January 2011, 29th March 2012, 2010, 1882, 2011, 1908, 2009, 1882, 1908, 2009, 1173 3, 1857, 1805, 1813, 1956, 1972, 1972, 1973, 1865, 2009, 2009, 2006, 1332, 2003, 2004, 1997, 1996, 1996, 2001, 2001, 2674, 1857-60, 2008, 1998, 1998, 2010, 1963, 1920, 1983, 2006, 2004, 1992, 1992, 1913, 100 years, a century, today, 1st October 2010, 1939, 1939, 2004, 2209, 32, 2009, 1882, 1882, 1882, 1882, 36, 1882, 1882, 54, 42, 2011, 45, 46, 1908, 2, 1908, 47, the year 1998, the early ages, 48, 1882, 49, 1996, 54, No.3.11, 1908, 1939, 1908, 58, 1908, 1908, one year, 1882, three months, more than one year, 1908, 1983, 1908, thirty days, 1983, 70, 72, 1983, 3992, 76, 2013, 2012, 18. 12, 86, 1882, 2011, 1971, 2

FAC: Respondent No.7, Respondent No.7, Respondent No.7, Judgment, the Civil Law, Judgment, Samarendra Nath Sinha Vs

ORDINAL: third, second, third, third, second, first, third, third, third, secondly, third, third, third, first, third, third, first, third, first, second, third, first, first, second, firstly, Secondly, Secondly, second, first, third, third

WORK_OF_ART: Agreement of Sale, Pralhad Jawale, Para No.30, Keshrimal Jivji Shah, the Doctrine of Lis Pendens, Lis Pendens", Lis Pendens, Lis Pendens, the Doctrine of Lis Pendens, Judgment of the Hon, the Doctrine of Lis Pendens, the Doctrine of Lis Pendens in Commentaries, the Doctrine of Lis Pendens, Keshrimal Jivji Shah

LOC: Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single, Kashmir, Single, Kashmir, Single

NORP: Hon'ble, Order XXII, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, finis

PRODUCT: Appellant, Judgment, Bombay Act XIV, 742, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, Respondent, Rules 1 and 2, Rules 1 and 2, Rules 1 and 2, Judgment, Report, Bombay Act XIV, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment

EVENT: Pralhad Jawale, Bombay Act XIV, Bombay Amendment Act XIV

TIME: 2A and Rule 11

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //