Reeta Srivastava Vs. District Magistrate, Lucknow and Another

Decided On : Dec-17-2014

Court : Allahabad Lucknow

LAW: Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002, Section 13(2, Section 17, the Securitisation Act, Section 13, Section 14 of the Securitisation Act, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 13(4, Section 13(4, Section 14, section 14, section 14, section 14, section 14, section 14, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14, Act 1 of 2013, Section 6, Section 14, Section 13(2, Section 13(4, Section 14, the Principal Act, the Securitisation Act, Section 14, Section 13

ORG: the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the Debt Recovery Tribunal, District Magistrate, the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the District Magistrate, the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the District Magistrate, Court, District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the Supreme Court, Standard Chartered Bank, Ors, The Supreme Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the District Magistrate, The District Magistrate, the Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, the District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, The District Magistrate, the Supreme Court, International Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd., Ors, the Supreme Court, the Transfer of Property Act, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, second, third, second, third, first, third

DATE: 15 September 2005, 24 June 2011, 60 days, 1 September 2011, 1 September 2011, 23 October 2011, 10 March 2014, 1 September 2011, 19 November 2011, 1 September 2011, 2013, 15 January 2013, 15 January 2013, 2014, 1882

CARDINAL: 4, 9, 620, three, three, 8(1, 8(2, 8(1, 6

GPE: Lucknow, Harshad Govardhan Sondagar

PERSON: V. Noble, Kumar, provisos