Arvind Kejriwal Vs. The State of U.P and Others - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Aug-27-2015

Court: Allahabad Lucknow

LAW: Section 125 of the Representation of People Act, Section 125 of the Representation of People Act, Section 239, Section 125 of the Representation of People Act, Section 125 of Representation of People Act, Section 239 Cr, Section 205, Section 88 Cr, Section 205, Section 205 Cr, Section 205, Section 205, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 317 of the Code, Section 273 of the Code, Section 138, Section 138, the NI Act, Section 251, Chapter XX, Section 205(1, Section 138 N.I. Act, Section 125 of Representation of People Act, Section 125 of Representation of People Act, Section 2, the Representation of People Act, Section 88 Cr, Section 88, Section 90 Cr, Section 88, Constitution, Section 125 of Representation of People Act, Section 125 of Representation of People Act, Article 51-A of the Constitution of India, Representation of People Act, Constitution, Chapter-XIX, Section 238, Section 207, Section 238 Cr, Section 205, Section 205, Section 317 Cr, Section 205, Section 317 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Section 482, Section 482 Cr, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482, Chapter-XIX of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 239, Section 240, Section 239, Section 239 Cr

CARDINAL: 1, 12.08.2015, 88, 317, 12.08.2015, 20.07.2015, 4, 121, 2, 251, 317, 19, 12, two, 317, 1, 2, 13, 1, two, 14, 15, one, 16, 17, one, 19, 125, 482, one, 1, 335, 7, 296, 1, 8, 9, 682, 6, 588, 1, 74, 2, 237, 4

ORG: Government Advocate, Criminal Case, U.P., Case Crime, District-Amethi, Judicial Magistrate, District-Amethi, Criminal Case, U.P., Case Crime, District-Amethi, Judicial Magistrate, District-Amethi, Hon'ble Court, Criminal Case, U.P., Case Crime, District-Amethi, Judicial Magistrate, District-Amethi, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Santosh Chauhan, State, U.P., Court, Sajjan Kumar Agarwal, AIR 2009, NOC, Court, Court, The Gauhati High Court, Allahabad High Court, M/s. Bhiwani Denim, Apparels Ltd, AIR 2001, SC, M/s. Bhiwani Denim, Apparels Ltd, AIR 2001, SC, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Sections 205, Magistrate, Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, State, State, State, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, the Trial Court, the First Information Report, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, the Trial Court, the Apex Court, Court, Apex Court, High Courts, Court, State of, Popular Muthiah Vs, Inspector of Police, State, U.P., Ors, M.N. Ojha and, A.P., SC, Iridium India Telecom Ltd., Motorola Incorporated, U.P., Court, High Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Amrawati, State, U.P., the Apex Court, State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors

DATE: 2014, 2014, 2014, 1951, 2014, 2014, 2014, 1951, 2014, 2014, 1951, 2011, 129, 3625, 3625, paras-12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, These are days, 1951, three years, two years, 1951, 1951, three years, 1951, 1992, 2006, 2008, 2008, 2009, JT 2010, 2011, 2012, 12.08.2015, four weeks, today, 2005, 2009

PERSON: Arvind Kejriwal, Arvind Kejriwal, Arvind Kejriwal, Roitong Singpho, Haryana, P.C. Article, Law, Haryana, Bhajan Lal, Supp, Rashid @ Rasheed and Ors, Monica Kumar, Anr, Alok Kumar Srivastav, Anr, Gourishetty Mahesh, Lee Kun Hee, Arvind Kejriwal, Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh

GPE: Musafirkhana, Musafirkhana, P.C., Musafirkhana, Delhi, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., Cr, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., N.C.T. Delhi, India, India, India, India, India, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., Cr, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., Hamida, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., Smt, Cr

ORDINAL: second, First, Second, first, first, first

NORP: cases.-

TIME: 14 of the Constitution of India

PRODUCT: Vs, Vs