Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India (P.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Decided On : Mar-10-2015
Court : Punjab and Haryana
LAW: Section 148, the Income Tax Act, Section 147 of the Act, Section 147, the Income Tax Act, Section 143 of the Act, Section 154, the Amending Act, Section 147, the Amending Act, section 147
PERSON: S.J. Vazifdar, Actg, Transfer, Detail, Detail
CARDINAL: 1. Rule, 2., No.2, No.2, 3., 20.11.2009, 232, 359, 31.03.2006, One, 4, 5., 20.11.2009, 13, 14, 14, 13, 14, 6., 8, 13, 9, One, 81, 10, 30.10.2009, 20, 24, 20, 24, 11, 20, 179, 12, 24.3.2011, D.C.I.T., 20.11.2014, 13, 147, 148, 14, 2010, 320, two, only one, 182, 29, 15, 2-4-2013, 16, 17, 23/24.3.2011
DATE: 1961, the assessment year 2006-07, 1961, 2.11.2006, the financial year 31.3.2006, the year end, the year 31.3.2006, the year, 16.11.2009, 24, 1987, Ist April, 1989, 1989, Ist April, 1989, 1987, October 31, 1989, 1990, 1989, 1989, 2011, the same day
NORP: P-1, P-1
ORG: P, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, M/s Southern Switch Gears, ITR, the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO, AO, Schedules, Accounting Policies, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, the Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, TPO, TPO, Anneuxre P-14, Assessing, Mitsubishi Corporation Japan, TDS, TDS, TCS, TDS, TDS, TDS, TCS, the Supreme Court, CIT, Kelvinator of India Ltd., ITR, The Supreme Court, the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, The Assessing Officer, Department, the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, Parliament, Parliament, Circular, ITR, Court, Trident Ltd., Union of India
WORK_OF_ART: Royalty, Royalty, Royalty, Royalty, Royalty, Royalty, Royalty, Royalty, Royalty" and Technical Assistance Fees, 31.8.2009 (Annexure P-9, Royalty, Royalty, Royalty, Royalty, 7.2 Amendment
GPE: Royalty, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Royalty
PERCENT: 5%
PRODUCT: 561/187 Taxman 312