Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Raman Bawa Vs. Amit Jain
Decided On : Dec-10-2015
Court : Punjab and Haryana
LAW: the Hindu Marriage Act, section 24
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 16.52, 3, 4., more than Rs.40,000/-, 5, two, one, one, about 17, 6., Four, at least Rs.2, 827, 2010(4, 262, 9, 218, Rs.2, Rs.2, 8., 9, Rs.50,000/-
ORG: Court, Kangaroo, Kangaroo, Kangaro Industries Ltd., Munix India Private Limited, Kangaroo Industries Ltd:, Munix India Pvt, The Senior Counsel, Court, Mercedes, Mercedes, BMW, Toyota, Learned Senior Counsel, The Senior Counsel, fed, Court, RCR, Court, Court, Arun Kumar Aggarwal, National Insurance Company Ltd, Court, Court, Court, Court
DATE: the last five decades, the years 2011 to 2014, the year 2012, the year 2013, the year ending with 31.03.2014, the years 2011, 2012, the year 2014, the year 2011, the year ending with 31.03.2014, the year 2011, the year 2012, the year 2013, 2014, 1018, 18.05.2011, the year 2011-12, the year 2012-13, the year 2013-14, monthly, 2010(3, 2010, four weeks
GPE: India, India, Ludhiana
PERCENT: 50%, 40%, 40%, less than 50%
PERSON: Rs.40,000/-, Sita Devi v. Vijay B. Verma, Rs.40,000/-
PRODUCT: Audi