Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Raman Bawa Vs. Amit Jain

Decided On : Dec-10-2015

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: the Hindu Marriage Act, section 24

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 16.52, 3, 4., more than Rs.40,000/-, 5, two, one, one, about 17, 6., Four, at least Rs.2, 827, 2010(4, 262, 9, 218, Rs.2, Rs.2, 8., 9, Rs.50,000/-

ORG: Court, Kangaroo, Kangaroo, Kangaro Industries Ltd., Munix India Private Limited, Kangaroo Industries Ltd:, Munix India Pvt, The Senior Counsel, Court, Mercedes, Mercedes, BMW, Toyota, Learned Senior Counsel, The Senior Counsel, fed, Court, RCR, Court, Court, Arun Kumar Aggarwal, National Insurance Company Ltd, Court, Court, Court, Court

DATE: the last five decades, the years 2011 to 2014, the year 2012, the year 2013, the year ending with 31.03.2014, the years 2011, 2012, the year 2014, the year 2011, the year ending with 31.03.2014, the year 2011, the year 2012, the year 2013, 2014, 1018, 18.05.2011, the year 2011-12, the year 2012-13, the year 2013-14, monthly, 2010(3, 2010, four weeks

GPE: India, India, Ludhiana

PERCENT: 50%, 40%, 40%, less than 50%

PERSON: Rs.40,000/-, Sita Devi v. Vijay B. Verma, Rs.40,000/-

PRODUCT: Audi

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //