Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kiran Bansal Vs. T. Chandra Kala and Another

Decided On : Oct-27-2015

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 65, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 66, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 66, the Evidence Act, the Registration Act, Section 35, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 36, Section 36, Section 66, the Indian Evidence Act, Order 11 Rule 14, Section 65 of the Evidence Act, Section 65, the Evidence Act, the Indian Registration Act, Section 49, the Registration Act, Article 31, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 35, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 35, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 35, Section 36

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, No.4, 4, 5., two, 8, 9, four, 10, 11, 12, 3, 697, 13, 1, 3, 23, 26, 262, 1, 1, 545, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 1, 22, 2, 23, 24, 25, 5, 730, 26, 2, 114, 27, 9, 728, 28, 29, 1.4.2009, 30, 31, 32, 3, 33, 4, 34, 5, 36., 37.

PERSON: Heard Sri M.A.K.Mukheed, Sri S.Bal Chand, Inderjit Kaur, Hemendra V.Shah, Sitarasami Garu, Kesava Rao Vs, Venkata Subbarao, Pagidi, dt.29.5.2013, Nawab Singh, K.Shobha Rani, Braja Kishore Nanda, Kesava Rao

ORG: This Revision Petition, the I Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, Sultan Bazaar, Hyderabad, the I Additional Rent Controller, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, Court, Government, Court, this Revision Petition, Court, AIR 1999, Murtaza Moosavi Vs, A.P., The Rajah of Bobbili Vs, Inuguganti, ILR, State of Bihar Vs, M/s.Karam Chand Thapar and Brothers Ltd, S.C. 110, the Revision Petition, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, CPC, Court, Murtaza Moosavi, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the State Legislature, Rs.100/-stamp, The Rajah of Bobbili, the Privy Council, M/s.Karam Chand, Thapar and Brothers Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the I Additional Rent Controller, the Civil Revision Petition

DATE: 2013, 2008, 2008, 18-08-2008, June 2008 to August 2008, the year 1999, 1999, 2013, 1872, 08-1999, 08-1999, 08-1999, April 2013, 31-01-2011, 1872, 08-1999, 08-1999, 08-1999, 08-1999, the 1st, 10-08-1999, 2011, 08-1999, 08-1999, 1872, 24-04-2013, the 1st, 08-1999, 2006, 08-1999, 08-1999, 11 months, 1908, 1899, 13-03-1995, 08-1999, 1899, 1962, 1971, the year 1999, 31-01-2011, 08-1999, 24-04-2013, more than two years, 08-1999, 08-1999, 08-1999, 08-1999, 08-1999, 2007, 2013, 2007, 08-1999, 08-1999, 1908, 01-04-1999, 08-1999, 08-1999, 1908, 08-1999, 1899, 1899, 1899, 35, 2013, 2008

GPE: Badichowdi, R.C., dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, R.C., dt.10, dt.10, R.C., I.A., dt.10, R.C., dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, Rs.9,60,000/-, China, P.C., R.C., dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, S.C.C., Benga, dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, dt.10, dt.10

ORDINAL: 1st, 1st, first, 1st, 1st, first, 1st, 1st, 1st, first, first

FAC: Nawab Singh Vs

EVENT: S.C. 1668

NORP: Indian

PRODUCT: AP Act No.4 of 1999

PERCENT: 5%, 3%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //