Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/s. T.R. Jewellery, a proprietary concern Rep. by its Proprietor Thiriveedhi Suresh Babu and Others Vs. M/s. State Bank of India, Vedayapalem Branch, Nellore and Another

Decided On : Nov-27-2015

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, the SARFAESI Act, Section 37, the SARFAESI Act, the Full Bench of, the SARFAESI Act, the SARFAESI Act', Section 13 of the Act, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, Section 13, Section 13, Section 14, the Section 14 of the Act, Act 1 of 2013, Section 14, Section 12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr., Section 17 of Code of Criminal Procedure the High Court, Section 20, Section 22, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 35 of the Act, Section 14, Section 35 of the Act, the SARFAESI Act, the SARFAESI Act, Section 35, Section 3(1)(d, Section 3(2, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14, Section 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 3(2, Section 3(3, Section 14, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 35, Section 2(2, the SARFAESI Act 2002, Section 35, the SARFAESI Act, Criminal Procedure Code, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 3 of Criminal Procedure Code, Section 37 of the Act, the Companies Act, Section 37, Section 37, the SARFAESI Act, Section 13(8, Section 29 of Recovery of Debts Due to, Section 37, Rule 15 of the Second Schedule of the Income Tax Rules, Section 37, the RDDB Act, the RDDB Act, Section 37, the SARFAESI Act, Section 37, the Companies Act, the SARFAESI Act, Section 29, Section 29, the Income Tax Act, Section 29, Rule 15, Section 37, the SARFAESI Act, Section 29, the SARFAESI Act, Section 29, Rule 15, Section 13(8, the SARFAESI Act, Section 29, Rule 15, the SARFAESI Act, Section 35 of the Act, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14(1A, Section 14(1)(a)(b, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act, Section 65-A of the Transfer of Property Act, Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14, Section 13(2, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, Section 14(1, Rule 8(1, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14, Section 14(1)(A, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act

WORK_OF_ART: C. Praveen, Schedule 2, Authorized Representative of the Constituted

DATE: 2014, 17625, 2014, 2014, 2002, 2014, the year 2013, 2013, 2008, 2014, 2009, 1993, few years, 2001, 2002, 1993, 2015, 2002, sixty days, 2012, 2004, 2009, 2013, Section 14(1, 1956, 1 of 1956, 1956, 42 of 1956, 1992, 15 of 1992, 1993, 51 of 1993, 1993, 1962, 1956, 1956, 1992, 1993, 1961, 1962, 1962, 1962, Rule 15, the year 2013, 17, 2014, 4) 81, 37, 2002, 2001, 2002

ORG: Court, Judicial Magistrate, Corporation, the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court, Court, W.P. No.5347 of, District Magistrate, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court, CMM, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, SARFAESI Act, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, C.J.M., C.J.M., the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Court, Legislature, the Bombay High Court, Arjun Urban Co-operative, Bank Limited, Maharashtra Law Journal, IndusInd Bank Limited, Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd., Legal Executive, The State of Maharashtra through Police Station, Division Bench, State Bank of India, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Kerala High Court, C.Arifa v. Union of India, AIR, the Government of India, The Tiwari Committee, the Committee on the Financial System, First Report, the Narasimham Committee, Committees, Parliament, the Recovery of Debts Due to, the Debts Recovery Tribunals, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunals, the Civil Courts, Government, Tribunals, the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, the Government of India, the Narasimham Committee, the Narasimham Committee, The Andhyarujina Committee, the Central Government, Andhyarujina Committees, The Government of India, Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, United Bank of India, Secured, Court, Tribunal, Keshavlal Khemchand, v. Union of India, Mardia Chemicals Limited v. Union of India, the Apex Court, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the Apex Court, District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, District Magistrate, Bank, Bank, Financial Institution, Bank, Financial Institution, the District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, The District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the District Magistrate, District Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate of First, a Metropolitan Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate of First Class, the Metropolitan Magistrates, C.J.M., C.M.M., Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, Court of a, Judicial Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, District Headquarters, the State Government, the Executive Magistrates, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the Executive Magistrates, the State Government, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the High Court, the State Government, the Executive Magistrates, District Magistrate, Executive Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Legislature, District Magistrates, Authority, District Magistrate, State Government, the Executive Magistrates, District Magistrate, SARFAESI Act, SARFAESI Act, SARFAESI Act, High Courts, C.Arifa v. Union of India, AIR 2009 Kerala, the Apex Court, U.P. Financial Corporation, AIR 2003 SC, the District Magistrate, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, W.P. No.5241 of, Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajahmundry, Dhanalakshmi Bank v. Kovai Foods, the Hon'ble Court, Circular, State, Ind Bank's, Bombay High Court, District Magistrate, Bench, Arjun Urban Co-operative, Bank Limited, Maharashtra Law Journal, Bombay High Court, the Kerala High Court, C.Arifa v. Union of India, the High Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Legislature, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, the Recovery of Debts Due to, SARFAESI Act, Sections 35, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, SARFAESI Act, Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002, SARFAESI Act, Bank, the Apex Court, SARFAESI Act, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, the Securities and Exchange Board, the Recovery of Debts Due to, the Securitisation Trust Rules, SARFAESI Act, SARFAESI Act, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Legislature, Legislature, District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Legislature, the District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, District Magistrate, District Magistrate, the Apex Court, UOI, Union Bank of India, The State of Maharashtrathrough the Office of the Government Pleader, Public Works Department, AIR 2010 Bom, District Magistrate, District Magistrate, Bombay High Court, International Asset Reconstruction Company Private Limited, Union of India, UOI, the District Magistrate, AIR 2011 Bom.163).In Mansa Synthetic Pvt. Ltd., Union of India, the Gujarat High Court, the District Magistrate, Apex Court, International Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd.'s, Laws (SC, SARFAESI Act, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, District Magistrate, Standard Chartered Bank, Apex Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, District Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, ITR, Supreme Court, Court, the Apex Court, Statute, National Insurance Company Ltd., Supreme Court, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Legislature, Legislature, State, Legislature, Tata Iron and Steel Co., Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Legislature, Judicial Magistrate

CARDINAL: 24.07.2014, 4, two, 110, 2880)and, 3, 750, two, 14)in, several hundred, two, more than 15, 304, two, 110, 4, 770, 2004(4, 81, one, 14, 1, 2, 4, 1A, 2, 1, 3, one, one, One, one, two, 14)after, 21.01.2013, one, two, 4, 37, 37, 1, 2, 9(1, 37,13(8, 37, 13, 68, 90, two, 26, 28, 35, 255, 147, four, 295, 2007(2, 470, 34, more than one, 6, 183

GPE: W.P.Nos.17589, P.C., Solapur, Narasimham, NPAs, NPAs, P.C., Metropolitan, P.C., P.C., Metropolitan, Forums, Cr, Solapur, Benchof, Metropolitan, Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Transcore v. Union of India, Kumar, M.Pentaiah, KLT, Legislatures

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, the Full Bench, The Full Bench, Rule 8 and 9, 1 Rule 15, 1 Rule 15, the Full Bench of

PERSON: Judicial Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Sri B.Chandrasen Reddy, Judicial Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Sri Sharad Sanghi, Judicial Magistrate, Srivilliputhur, Solapur v. Chief, Judicial Magistrate, Ravindrakumar Prakash Bhargodev, Sri B.S.Prasad, Mohd, Shri T. Tiwari, Shri M. Narasimham, Satyawati Tondon, Judicial Magistratehas, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrates, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Law, Law, Mohd, Judicial Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrates, Judicial Magistrate, Solapur v. Chief, Judicial Magistrate, Mohd, Judicial Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Srivilliputhur, Mathew Varghese, Schedule 2, Schedule 2, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Shri Tushar B.Patel v., Metropolitan Magistrate, SCALE 540)was, Judicial Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Padmasundara Rao v. State, Bench, Muddala Veeramallappa, Bench, Laxmi Narain Dhut, i. e., Anr, Judicial Magistrates, Metropolitan Magistrates, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Bench

FAC: Tamil Nadu High Court, the Tamil Nadu High Court, the District Magistrate

TIME: 30-9-1990

ORDINAL: first, second, second, third

LOC: Metropolitan, Metropolitan, Metropolitan, Metropolitan

NORP: Metropolitan, Metropolitan

EVENT: Chengalpattu under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //