Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax Department, Visakhapatnam and Other Vs. M/s. United Breweries Limited, Bangalore represented by its Authorised Signatory and Others

Decided On : Dec-16-2015

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 143(3, the Income Tax Act, Section 156, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 226(3, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Income Tax Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 17, the Prohibition and Excise Department, Rule 11, the Income Tax Act, the Tax Recovery Officer, Article 289 of the Constitution of India, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Income Tax Act, Section 143(3, the Income Tax Act, Constitution, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 226, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery, the Tax Recovery Officer, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, the Second Schedule, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution, the Second Schedule, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: Common Order, Rs.1468.64, Rs.1468.64, IMFL, IMFL, IMFL, IMFL, Sri S.Ravi, IMFL, TSBCL, Sri S. Ravi, Sri R. Raghunandan, Sri K. Vivek Reddy, IMFL, Sri J.V.Prasad, IMFL, IMFL, IMFL, Sri S. Ravi, Sri R. Raghunandan, Sri K. Vivek Reddy, a Registered Clerk, Art, B.Sheetal Nandwani, Art, Ltd.(AIR, Pernod Ricard India, S. Samuel, Amalendu Das, Deoraj v. State of, B.Sheetal Nandwani, Kartick Das, Sri S. Ravi, Sri R. Raghunandan, Sri K.Vivek Reddy, Sri J.V.Prasad, Sri S.Ravi, Sri K.Vivek Reddy, Antonio S.C., Shyamlal, Srinivas v. Govt, Orissa, Ram Chandra Dev, Mohan Prasad, Sri S.Ravi, Sri R. Raghunandan, Trehan v., Ram Krishna Verma v. State

DATE: the assessment year 2012-2013, years 2006-07, 2008-09, 2009-10, the assessment year 2012-13, 2015, 26.02.2015, only six months, six months, three months old, 2015, six months, six months, six months, years, 2015, 2015, 2015, only six months, 2012-13, 1993, 5606 of 2015, 5606 of 2015, 2015, 2015, 30th May, 2014, 2012-13, 2015, the earlier assessment years 2006-07, 2008-09, 2009-10, Rule 16(9, six months, 14.01.2015, the period 17.04.2015, year 2004-05, year 2013-14, 1977, 1289, 1984, 1995, 2015, six months, 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 1993, 2004, 1994, 2005, 2.9, 1983, 2006, 1964, 1997, 1994, 2011, 1980

ORG: The Assessing Authority, Appellate Tribunal, APBCL, the Government of A.P, APBCL, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals, Sections 222, APBCL, Income Tax, APBCL, the Commissioner of Income-Tax, APBCL, Income-Tax, APBCL, APBCL, W.P. No.4517, Division, Court, APBCL, Foreign Liquor, Indian Made Foreign Liquor, APBCL, FL, APBCL, Court, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, FL, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, Division, W.P. No.9254, Division, the Income Tax Department, APBCL, FL, FL, Learned Senior Counsel, FL, W.P. No.9254, the Income Tax Department, Court, Division, Court, the Income Tax Department, FL, Court, W.P. No.9254, Division, APBCL, the Government of A.P, Division, the Income Tax Department, APBCL, APBCL, Division, Court, the Income Tax Department, the Income Tax Department, Income Tax, FL, the State of Andhra Pradesh, the State Government, IMFL/FL/Beer, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, the High Court, the Income Tax Department, the Income Tax Department, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, State, Court, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, Court, APBCL, Court, Court, APBCL, Court, APBCL, the A.P. Regulation of Wholesale Trade, the State of Andhra Pradesh, APBCL, the Income tax Department, APBCL, Court, the Income Tax Department, the Telangana Beverages Corporation, the High Court, W.P. No.5616, Court, the Income Tax Department, Court, Court, Court, Division, W.P. No.5616, The Telangana State Beverages Corporation Limited, W.P. No.5606, W.P. No.5616, 01.05.2015, Division, TSBCL, TSBCL, APBCL, TSBCL, APBCL, APBCL, TSBCL, Division, TSBCL, Reliance, APBCL, W.P. No.5606, APBCL, Court, Learned Senior Counsel, Learned Counsel, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Division, FL, APBCL, Court, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, the Income Tax Department, Court, APBCL, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, APBCL, Income Tax, APBCL, APBCL, the A.P. Excise Rules, Court, FL, APBCL, FL, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, APBCL, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, APBCL, APBCL, Court, FL, APBCL, Court, APBCL, APBCL, Learned Senior Counsel, the Income Tax Department, Court, APBCL, Court, the Government of Andhra Pradesh Rs.302.02, APBCL, the State Government, the the Writ Petition, APBCL, APBCL, Income Tax, the High Court, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, Court, Court, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, I. POWER TO GRANT AD-INTERIM EX PARTE ORDERS SHOULD BE EXERCISED WITH GREAT CIRCUMSPECTION, Learned Counsel, the Income Tax Standing Counsel, Court, the Writ Petition, the Standing Counsel, Court, the Writ Proceeding Rules, Registry, Government, the Government Pleadersoffice, the Standing Counsel, the Standing Counsel, Registry, the Writ Petition, the Standing Counsel, the Income Tax Department, Court, the Income Tax Department, the High Court, The High Court, AIR 1985 SC, State, Calcutta Hardware Stores, AIR 1986, SC, Court, Union of India v., Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd., Court, AIR 1985 SC 330, Calcutta Hardware Stores, the Income Tax Department, Sri J.V. Prasad, Learned Standing Counsel, Income-Tax Department, DoctorsAction Committee, AIR 1992 SC 671, Dunlop India Ltd., Calcutta Hardware Stores, AIR 1986, SC, Union of India v. Jain Shudh Vanaspati, Bank of Maharashtra v. Race Shipping, Transport Co. Pvt, SC 1368);Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd., W.P. No.9254, M/s. United Breweries Limited, the Income Tax Department, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, the Income Tax Department, APBCL, SAB Miller India Limited, the Commissioner of Income Tax, APBCL, the Commissioner of Income Tax, APBCL, W.P. No.9779, Diageo India Private Limited, IMFL, APBCL, APBCL, W.P. No.9789, United Spirits Limited, IMFL, APBCL, APBCL, W.P. No.10109, the Income Tax Officials, the Tax Revenue Officials, APBCL, W.P. No.10588, Bacardi India Private Limited, the State of A.P., APBCL, the Writ Petition, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, High Courts, Home, Singh Grewal, Dunlop India Ltd., the Supreme Court, Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, Samarias Trading Co. Pvt, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd., State, Union of India v., Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd., Union of India v. Join Shudh Vanaspati Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Dyeing and Mfg. Co. Ltd., Bombay Environmental Action, the Writ Petition, Court, APBCL, Court, Court, Bombay Dyeing, Mfg. Co. Ltd., Stanley Mutual Fund, Bank, Bombay Dyeing, Mfg. Co. Ltd., Court, Bombay Dyeing, Mfg. Co. Ltd., APBCL, the Sale of Goods Act, Learned Senior Counsel, Learned Counsel, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, APBCL, APBCL, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, a Civil Court, Suit, the Income Tax Department, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, Court, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd., State of, AIR 1983 SC, Learned Senior Counsel, Learned Counsel, Court, Civil Court, Church of South India Trust Assn, SC, APBCL, Andhra Bank, APBCL, APBCL, Court, APBCL, Learned Senior Counsel, Court, Court, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, APBCL, APBCL, APBCL, Court, APBCL, Court, APBCL, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Court, Court, Kanoria Chemicals and Industries Ltd., U.P. State Electricity Board, Balsara Hygiene Products, SCC 380);Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, UOI, Court, Court, Grindlays Bank Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Calcutta, Court, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, APBCL, VAT, Court, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, APBCL, the Government of A.P, APBCL, FL, IMFL, TDS, Court, the Income Tax Department, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, APBCL, the Income Tax Department, the Writ Petition, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, APBCL, APBCL, WPMPs

CARDINAL: 14.01.2015, 229, 231, 232, 12.02.2015, 16.02.2015, one, Rs.489.07, 02.04.2015, Rs.489.07, three lakhs, more than Rs.489.07, 12.03.2015, over 500, 159, 160, 5616, Rs.489.07, Three, tabular, tabular, three lakhs, tabular, 23.04.2015, 18.04.2015, 226, 614, 2, 646, 226, 1983)Interim, 4, 4, 697, 5, 4, 3, 178).The, two, 2.2.A, 2.8, 2.11(A, 2.12, 4, 8, 11(4, 11(5, 11(6, 142, 663, 7, 740, 10, 310);G., 13, 712, 685, Rs.489.07, 5, 772, 5, 8, 161, 2, 2, 620, 20.01.2016, Rs.489.07, 26.01.2016

WORK_OF_ART: The Writ Petition, a Writ Petition, Collector of Central Excise v. Dunlop India Ltd.

EVENT: the Second Schedule, the Second Schedule of the Income Tax Act

GPE: W.P.M.P. No.12189, IMFL, IMFL, TSBCL, Rajasthan v.Swaika Properties, West Bengal, C.A., Siliguri Municipality, Orissa, Orissa, Singh

ORDINAL: third, first, first, second, second, firstly, firstly

FAC: the Writ Petition

PRODUCT: 614).An, Calcutta

NORP: Statute

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //