Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

B. Hima Bindu Vs. Commissioner, Customs, CE and Service Tax

Decided On : Mar-10-2016

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 130, the Customs Act, Section 129-E of the Customs Act, Section 129-E of the Customs Act, Section 129(1, the Customs Act, Chapter XV, Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, Act 25, Section 129, the Customs Act 1952, the Finance Act, the Customs Act, the Finance Act, Act 25, Chapter, Chapter, the Customs Act, the Finance Act, Section 129-E of the Customs Act, Section 129, Section 189, Section 129, Section 129A, the Customs Act, Section 129E, Section 129E., Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act and Section 129-E of the Customs Act, Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act and Section 129-E of the Customs Act, Section 35F, Section 129E, the Customs Act, Section 129-B of the Customs Act and Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, Section 35G of the Central Excise Act Section 130, the Customs Act Appeal, Section 130, the Customs Act, Section 130, the Customs Act, Constitution, Section 130, the Customs Act, Section 129-B of the Customs Act, 1952, Section 35-C, Section 129-B of the Customs Act and Section 35-C of the Central Excise Act, Section 129-E, Section 129-E, Section 129-E of the Customs Act, Section 129-E of the Customs Act, Section 129-E, Section 129-E, Section 129-E, the Customs Act, Section 129-E of the Customs Act, the Finance Act, Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, Section 129-B of the Customs Act and Section 35-C of the Central Excise Act, Section 35-C, Section 129-B(2-A, the Customs Act, Section 35 C of the Central Excise Act Orders, the Customs Act, Act 20 of 2002, Act 17, Act 20 of 2002, Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, Section 129-E of the Customs Act, Section 35-C of the Central Excise Act, Section 129-B of the Customs Act, 1952, Section 35C(2A, Section 35C, Section 35F, Chapter, Section 35C(2A, Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, Rule 19, Rule 28A(6, Section 35C(2A, Section 35C(2A, Section 35C, Section 35C, Section 35F, Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, Section 35C, Section 35-C, Section 129-B, the Customs Act, Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, Section 129-E of the Customs Act, Section 35-C(2A, Section 129-B, the Customs Act, Section 129(1, the Customs Act, Section 129-E of the Customs Act, 1952, Section 35-F of the Act, Section 35-C of the Central Excise Act and Section 129-B of the Customs Act, Section 130, the Customs Act

PERSON: Common Order, Bangalore, Miscellaneous Order Nos.27769-27781/2013, multiplex equipment, VMCL, Sri S. Ravi, Sri Gopalakrishna Gokhale, Ahamedabad, Kumar Cotton Mills Pvt, Bangalore, VMCL, VMCL, VMCL, XV, XV, Seth Nand, Lal v. State, Vijay Prakash D. Mehta v., XV, Navinchandra Chotelal v. Central Board of Excise, Vijay Prakash D. Mehta, Guntur Commisionerate, S. Vasudeva v. State, Saha, Salimbhai Abdulgaffar Shaikh, Guran Ditta, T. Ram Ditta, Arigela Laxmi, Purushottam Tiwari, Boodireddy Chandraiah22, Chunilal V. Mehta, K.V.Swamynathan v., E.V. Padmanabhan, Chunilal V. Mehta, Subba Rao, Noony Veeraju, Rimmalapudi Subba Rao, Tirupati 2006(2, Sri S. Ravi, Swastic Woolens, Morey, Sri S. Ravi, FAILURE, Sri S. Ravi, Chandra Chottelal, Vijay Prakash D. Mehta, Navinchandra Chotelal, XV, Vijay Prakash D. Mehta, Chandra Chottelal, Vijay Prakash D. Mehta, Chandra Chottelal, Vijay Prakash D. Mehta, Chandra Chottelal, Vijay Prakash D. Mehta, Chandra Chottelal

DATE: 1952, 27.10.2014, 12 weeks, twelve weeks, 8 weeks, 2009, 2011, 2005, 2013, A101, 2015, 2015, 2014, the years 2006, 2007, 5780, 1952, 1980, 1952, 2014, 2010, 1952, 1980, 1878, 1971, 1952, 2010, 2007, 2009, 2006, 2007, 2007, 2009, 2006, 1993, twelve weeks, 2003, the 1st day of July, 2003, the 1st day of July, 2003, 1952, 1952, Article 133(1)(a, 2007, 1314, JT 1991(1, 1988, 1999, 1952, 1952, 1980, a period of, three years, five days, 11.5.2002, a period of, three years, five days, 11.5.2002, a period of, three years, 1982, the day, the day, the day, the three year, 180 days, Section 35C, 1944, six months, 2004, 10.05.2013, 1952, 1952

ORG: Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, DWDM, M/s Prithvi Information Solutions Ltd, M/s VMC Systems Ltd, PISL, M/s Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, M/s Sojitz Corporation, SC, Punjab Communications Limited, PCL, CESTAT, PISL, VMCL, BSNL, CESTAT, CESTAT, PISL, PCL, PISL, SC, Judicial, PCL, PISL, PCL, CESTAT, Learned Senior Counsel, CESTAT, Court, CESTAT, CESTAT, Learned Senior Counsel, the Calcutta High Court, Promising Exports Ltd v Union of India, ELT, Division, the Calcutta High Court, ELT, Learned Standing Counsel, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, Court, Learned Standing Counsel, Customs, SC, ELT, SC, Everest Rolling Mills Pvt, Union of India, ELT, SC, Reliance Cellulose Products Ltd., AP, Swamsar Industrial Services, CESTAT, STR, AP, CESTAT, Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing Equipment, DWDM, DWDM, DWDM, HTCL, DWDM, DWDM, PISL, SC, CESTAT, BSNL, VMCL, Customs, PISL, PISL, KB, DWDM, DWDM, VMCL, VMCL, HTCL, SC, HTICPL, PISL, HTCL, HTCL, HTICPL, HTICPL, PISL, BSNL, CESTAT, HTCL, CESTAT, KB, BSNL, I. THE SCOPE OF SECTION, CESTAT, the Supreme Court, Court, the Collector (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Collector (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Commissioner(Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, Shyamkishore v. Municipal Corporation, AIR 1992 SC 2279, AIR 1980 SC 2097, AIR 1988 SC, Customs, CESTAT, CESTAT, A.P. High Court, CEA, Indu Nissan Oxo Chemicals Industries Limited v. Union of India, Tribunal, Benara Valves Ltd., Central Excise, VST, SC, Tribunal, Union of India v. Adani Exports Ltd., Tribunal, Bhavya Apparels, Union of India, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Benara Valves Ltd., Central Excise, VST, SC, Enforcement Directorate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Statute, PISL, PCL, CESTAT, CESTAT, Court, the Court/Tribunal, the High Court, CESTAT, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, CESTAT, Parliament, AIR 1928, Boodireddy Chandraiah, Boodireddy Chandraiah, Santosh Hazari, the Court/Tribunal, the Court/Tribunal, the Court/Tribunal, Supreme Court, Century Spinning, Manufacturing Co. Ltd., AIR 1962 SC, Boodireddy Chandraiah, Court, Boodireddy Chandraiah, AIR 1951 Mad 969, Tribunal, Crane Betel Nut Powder Works, Customs, CESTAT, Learned Senior Counsel, CESTAT, BSNL, CESTAT, BSNL, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, Tribunal, Crane Betel Nut Powder Works, CESTAT, BSNL, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Crane Betel Nut Powder Works, Collector of Customs, The High Court, Tribunal, Court, CESTAT, Tribunal, Crane Betel Nut Powder Works, Kondiba Dagadu Kadam, CESTAT, Tribunal, Boodireddy Chandraiah, Reserve Bank of India, Kondiba Dagadu Kadam29, the High Court, CESTAT, Learned Senior Counsel, CESTAT, CESTAT, Learned Senior Counsel, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Supreme Court, CESTAT, CESTAT, Sections, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Appellate Tribunal Section, Section 35B, Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Oxford English Dictionary, Tribunal, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal for pre-deposit, Section 35B, Sub-Section, the Appellate Tribunal, the Calcutta High Court, Division, the Calcutta High Court, Division, the Supreme Court, Sub “section, Section 35B of the Act, Sub-Section, pre “deposit, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Central Excise, ELT, the Supreme Court, the Sub-Section, Tribunal, The Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Kumar Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd, Tribunal, the Calcutta High Court, Shree Gobinddeo Glass Workd Ltd, the Supreme Court, Vijay Prakash D. Mehta10, the Supreme Court, Sub-Section, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT

CARDINAL: 3.7.2014, 27.10.2014, 27.10.2014, 28.1.2015, 243, 3, 263, 178, 180, 434, 297, 320, 320, 33, two, 2.5, 32, 10, 40, 70, around 19,000, more than 16,000, one, 70, 129E, 35F, 6.8.2014129, 1, 1, 1, 1, 19.01.2011, 13, 487, 20, 13, 347, Two, 20, 13, 347, 12, 359, 1, 2, three, 3, 4, 5, 6, 27.10.2014, one, 8, two, 1, 172, 8, 155, 179, 796, 3, 803, one, two, 2A, 2A, 1, one hundred and, one hundred and eighty-five days, 2A, two, 2A, 1, one hundred and, one hundred and eighty-five days, 2A, two, 10.05.2013, one hundred and eighty days, 2A, 1, 35C(2A, 35F, 35F, 35C(2A, 2A, 2A, 20, 2A, 2A, 2A, two, 2A, 2A, 169, 267, 2A, tabular, two, 2A

GPE: Japan, Guntur, Poranki, Vijayawada, Poranki, Poranki, Vijayawada, Poranki, Vijayawada, Poranki, Vijayawada, Karnataka, Poranki, Vijayawada, Poranki, Vijayawada, Rimmalapudi, Guntur, Guntur, Guntur, Bombay, Navin, Navin, Navin, Navin, IPCL, Navin

PERCENT: 10%, 5%, 1%, 10%, 5%, 1%, 50%, 25% and, 25%, 50%, 10%, 5%, 1%, 10%, 5%, 1%

ORDINAL: third, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, third, first, first, first, first, third, second, second, third

WORK_OF_ART: Moon Light Exim Pvt, Collector of Customs (Preventive) Bombay, 10 SCC 129, 3 SCC 467, Savitribai Sopan Gujar, Decide, the Larger Bench

PRODUCT: A289, 13 SCC 207, Supp

NORP: Indian, Central Excise, Statute, contra, CESTAT, CESTAT, Rules

QUANTITY: three hundred and sixty, three hundred and sixty

LOC: Single Judge

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //