P. Govindasamy Vs. Manickam and Others - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Dec-01-2015

Court: Chennai

LAW: Order XXXVI Rule 9, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, Rule 6, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Companies Act, Order 7 Rule 11(d, Order 7 Rule 11(d, Order 7 Rule 11, Order 7, Rule 11(D, Order 1, Rule 1, Order 1, Rule 3, Order 2, Rule 3, Order 1 of the Code, Rule 9, Order 1, Rule 10, Order 1, Order 7 Rule 11(D, Order 7 Rule 11(d, Order 7 Rule 11, the Indian Evidence Act, Order VII Rule 11(d, Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Order VII Rule 11, Order VII, Order VII, Paras 5, Order VII Rule 11, Order VII, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Tamilnadu Shops and Establishments Act, Section 41(3, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 41(12, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 17, the Limitation Act, Section 17, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Order 33, Order 33, Order 7 Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Respondents 1, the Law of Limitation, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 22, the Limitation Act, Section 22, the Limitation Act, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 160/91, Section 17, the Limitation Act, Section 17, Section 17, the Limitation Act, Madras 26, Section 17, the Limitation Act, the Section 17, the Limitation Act, section 17, the Limitation Act, Section 17, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Proprietor of M/s.Chennai Silks, the Civil Procedure Code

CARDINAL: 21.09.2012, 21.09.2012, 2, 21.09.2012, 13, 3, 21.09.2012, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 5, 638, 639, 4, 409, 14, 15, 10, 3, 106, 107, 8, 11, 5, 6, 11, 10, 59, 61, 12, 20.For, 12, 5, 183, 13, 2, 378, 11, 6, 2, 11, 1, 15, 1, 16, 2, 11, 17, 2, 140, 142, 7, 3, 50,010, 8, 1, 18, 6, 614, 615, 616, 5, 6., 19, 2, 567, 15, 20, 5, 614, 617, 2, 193, 0.6, 4, 22, 1, four, 23, 1, 5, four, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 25.07.2009, 25, 1, 26, 1, 1, 1, 27, 28, under Or.7, 29, 174, 30, 193, 31, 32, 99, 33, 316, 34, 33, 88, 38, 34, 250, 102, 39, Or.2, 40., 278, 41, 2, 472, 11, 12, 119, 1, 432, 5 to 11, 5, 4 to 19, 600 017, 10, 1, 2, 6, 1, 2, 1, 2, 4, 19, 1, 8., 1, 2, 19.09.2007, 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 16.11.2009, 43, 1, 11, 1, 2, 1, 2, 11, 11, 25.07.2009, 22.02.2008, 10.30, 25.07.2009, 47, 6, 48, 103, 1, 1, 50, 177, 51, 22.02.2008, 25.07.2009, 11, 1)when, 2)when, 21.09.2012

DATE: 2012, 2012, J. 1, 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, 2006, 1956, Para 13, 1964, 14, 1995, 2007, 11, 4, 2007, 66 to 68, 20 and 21, 183/74, 183/74, the month of October, 1986, the month of September, 1986, the year 1985, July, 1985, 1986, 424/89, 1974, the year 1986, 1989, 1963, a period of, three years, 11, 14, 2000, Para 12, 1947, 2012, para 11, C.S.No.14 of 2012, 8, 1963, 2005, 1989, 1967, 1973, 15, three months, February 26, 1949, that day, July 18, 1949, 2007, Para 25, 21, 1994, 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, 28.10.2010, 2012, 06.10.2006, 1956, 2012, 24, 2012, the year 2006, 2009, 2010, 11.11.2011, 1908, 1998, 35, 33, 36, 1910, 1963, the year 2002, 1964, 2006, 1995, 42, 16.10.2006, 2006, the last two weeks of September 2006, 2-3 days, 06.10.2006, 16.11.2009, 19.09.2007, 44, 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, 2012, 2012, 45, 19.07.2010, 2012, 21.09.2012, 2009, 23.03.2009, 25.07.2009, 2009, 46, 07.03.2008, 07.03.2008, 07.01.2009, 23.03.2009, 2009, 1963, 1997, 3416, 1994, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1963, 2004, 49, Section 18, 1963, C.S.No.14 of 2012, 1963, 2009, 2012, the period of, three years, 52, 2012, 2012, 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012, 2012, C.S.No.14 of 2012

PERSON: M. Venugopal, Law, Appellant, Vadilal Mehta, Prem Lala Nahata, Ram Prakash Gupta V. Rajiv, Kumar Gupta, Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Shri Inder Prakash Gupta, Plaintiff, Ram Prakash Gupta, Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Shri Inder Prakash Gupta, Shri Rajeev, Kumar Gupta, Nizamuddin Basti, Indra Prakash Gupta, Shri Rajeev, Kumar Gupta, Rajeev Kumar, Ram Prakash, Narayan Reddy, Chettiar V. A.Mariasusai, Ramamurthy V. Ravula Somasundaram, Petitioner, Jugal Kishore, V. Dhanno Devi, Lrs, V. Hede, V. Hede, Law, Stray, B.B.Bangarshettar V. ITT Pattnshetti, R.17, Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal V. National, Balwant Singh V. State, Law, Law, Veerandra Nath Gautam V. Satpal, Particulars, Particulars, Atpendra Roy, Gunnaji V. Makanji, Law, Mohan Lal, V. Priya Soluman, Razia Begum V. Anwar Begum, Ramprasad V. Vijayakumar, R.17, Chennai, Law, Crl, Yeshwant Deo Rao V. Vasudeo, Sakharam Soman, Syed, Gulam Ghouse Mohiuddin v. Syed Shah Ahmed Mohiuddin Kanisul, Rajkishore Saha V. Panna, Lal Ghose, Naidu V. Jagannath, Marappa Gounder V. In, Chetty V. Lon Pow, Kumar Rawala, Knowledge, Shamsuddeen V. Lakshmi, Giribala V. Usha Giri Devi, C.S.14, Law, Law, Law, Law

ORG: Original Side Appeal, Court, Appellant, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Others V. Bipin, Special Page, CPC, CPC, AIR 1964, SC, CPC, Company Application, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CTC, Suit, Suit, the Courts of Civil Judicature, Civil Procedure, Suit, Suit, non-joinder, Court, Court, Suit, Suit, Suit, Court, Appellant, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CPC, CPC, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the High Court, Plaintiff, Rajeev, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the High Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Defendants, Plaintiff, M/s, Aseema Architect, Plaintiff, Aseema Architect, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, the High Court, the High Court's, the High Court, Suit, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, GPA Laxmi, MLJ 377 Supreme Court, Special Page, CPC, Appellant, the Hon'ble Supreme, V. State Bank of India, a Civil Court, Court, Court, Authority, Court, Labour (Appeals, Authority, Tamilnadu Shops, Labour (Appeals, Civil Court, Labour (Appeals, Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Cause of Action, Court, Court, Deiveekalingam and Natarajalingam, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Suit, Court, Suit, Suit, Suit, Respondents, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court Hardesh Ores, Court, MLJ, Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/First Respondent/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff/First Respondent, the Application A.No.2589 of, the Appellant/Plaintiff/First Respondent, M/s.T.C.S. Textiles Private Limited, the First Respondent/First Applicant/First Defendant, the Appellant/Plaintiff, M/s.T.C.S. Textiles Private Limited, Cause of Action, Cause of Action, The Appellant/Plaintiff/First Respondent, Court, the Civil Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff/First Respondent, Cause of Action, the Appellant/Plaintiff/First Respondent, Court, Plaintiff, a Court of Law, Court, AIR, Court, AIR, AIR 1987, SC, Court, AIR 1969, Sant Ram Agarwal V. Civil, Mohanlal Ganj, AIR 1994, AIR 1976, Contra, a Court of Law, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR 2007, SC, AIR 2007, Court, Court, ILR, Court, AIR 1999 (Raj, Court, AIR 1958, Court, Court, Suffice, Court, 'Discretion of Court', the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR 1967 SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, a Court of Law, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Chennai &, Chennai Silks, Doc, this Hon'ble Court, the Civil Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Court, Court, Central Crime Branch, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Court, Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff (Petitioner, the Civil Court, Court, the Civil Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Commissioner of Police, No.1747, Central Crimes, Chennai, Crl, Court, Court, AIR 1951, AIR 1971, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR, Court, AIR 1955 (Assam, the Appellant/Plaintiff's, Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Crl, Court, the Civil Court, Court, Sale Deeds, Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the First Respondent/Plaintiff (Appellant, the Public Relation Officer, A Civil Court, Court, the Appellant/First Respondent, Court, Court

WORK_OF_ART: Collusion', Appellant/Plaintiff, The Chennai Silks' and Second Respondent, The Chennai Silks', the Sale Deed, Appellant/Plaintiff, 'Amendment of Pleadings', 'Amendment of Pleadings', Appellant/Plaintiff, Appellant/Plaintiff, R.10 of the Civil Procedure Code

LOC: Learned Single, Suit No, Single, South Usman Road

NORP: Demurrer, Paras, Demurrer, contra

PRODUCT: 101, Kumar, Assema Architect, Mahadeo Prasad Burnwal v., Appellant

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, third, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, third

GPE: Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, C.P.C., Nos.2, Crl, Gurgaon, Singh, Jhar, p.a., p.a., the Learned Single, the Learned Single, Crl, Crl, No.19676/2009, Chennai City, Cr, P.C., Quaduri, Fraud, the Learned Single, the Learned Single, the Learned Single, the Learned Single

EVENT: SC 2023, under Company Act, the Civil Procedure Code, SC 16, SC 2184, SC 853

PERCENT: 1%, one percent, 2%, 21%, 1%, 1%, 12%, 1%, 1%, 1%, 24%, 1%

FAC: Pinchala Subramani Street, Pinjala Subramaniam Street, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff