Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. HCL Infosystems Ltd.

Decided On : Dec-21-2015

Court : Delhi

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 260A, the Companies Act, Article 12.4, the Letter Agreement', the Termination Agreement, Article 14.3, Article I, Nine million dollars, Article, Section 143, Section 55, Section 2(47)(ii, Section 55, Section 45, Section 55, the Income Tax Act, Section 55, Section 45, Section 55, Section 55, Section 45 of the Act, Section 55, Section 45, Section 45, Section 48, Section 49, Section 49, Section 55, Section 55, Section 55, Section 49, the Finance Act, Section 55, Section 55, Section 28 of the Act, Section 28, Section 28, the Income Tax Act, Section 28, the Income Tax Act, Section 2, Section 55, Section 55, Section 55

PERSON: S. Muralidhar, Background, Shiv Nadar, Kiran Nadar, Roshini Nadar, Ajai Chowdhry, D.S. Puri, Arjun Malhotra, Y.C. Vaidya, Subhash Arora, Exhibit, c. Cash, Raghvendra K. Singh, Ajay Vohra, Vohra, Khanna

DATE: J. 1, 1961, October 2002, 1280, 1998-99, 1st February 2006, 1956, 17th April 1986, 2nd April 1991, 27th May 1991, October 1990, 2nd April 1991, November 1992, Annual, annual, the current financial year, Annual, 31st October 1991, five years, six years, November 1991, five years, 1st April 1997, September 1995, 1st April 1997, April 5, 1997, 31st January 2001, 1997, 1961, 21, 31st March 2002, the year ended 31st March 1997, 31st March 1998, 1st April 2002, April 1998, the previous year, the previous year, 1964, 1999, 1986, 15 years, 4th January 1948, 1st June 1948, 10th June 1949, four years, 2013, the year 1983, August 1992, 1996, November 1996, 31st March 2014, 2014, 48, 34, April 1998, 2002, 1st April 2002, 1st April 2002, 1st April 2003, 36, 2014, April 2003, from 1st day of, April 2003, 38, April 2003, 1st April 2003, 1st April 2003, 2008

ORDINAL: 3rd, 24th, 30th, first, 5th, first, Secondly, 14th, 14th

ORG: the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ˜ITAT', Court, HCL Infosystems Limited ( ˜HIL', HCL Limited, Hewlett Packard Inc, HP, Hewlett-Packard India Pvt. Ltd. ( ˜HPI', HP, HP, HCL Limited, HP, HPI, S.S. Nadar, Shiv Nadar Investments Pvt Ltd., the Control Group', JVA, JVA, HCL Limited, HIL, HPI, JVA, HP, Hewlett-Packard Delaware Capital Inc. ( ˜HPDC', HIL, Hewlett Packardunder, JVA, HCL Hewlett-Packard Ltd ( ˜HCL, HP Ltd.', JVA, JVA, HCL, HP, Apollo Computers Domain GMBH, Apollo Computer Inc., Apollo, HP, Apollo, HCL, Representation Agreement, HP, HCL, HPI, HP, HP, HCL, JVA, JVA, HCL HP Ltd., HCL, JVA, HCL HP Ltd:, HP, HP, HP, HP, HP, JVA, HP, HP, HP, HP, HP, the HCL HP Ltd, HCL, the Control Group, HCL HP Ltd., HP, HP, HP, Clause 7.5, JVA, HCL Ltd., HCL HP, the 'Spinoff', HCL, Clause 1.24 Spinoff', HCL, the Technology Licence and Technical Assistance Agreement (, TLTAA, HCL, HCL HP, TLTAA, HP, JVA, HP, the HCL HP Ltd, HP, HIL, HP, HP, HP, HP, HCL HP Ltd., HP, HCL HP Ltd., HP, HP, HCL HP Ltd, HP, HP, Business Planwas, JVA, HCL, HPI, d. Capital, JVA, HCL HP Ltd., Board, Board, NCA, Non-Competition Agreement ( ˜NCA', HP, HCL HP Ltd, HCL HP Ltd, the Reserve Bank of India ( ˜RBI', NCA, HP, HP, HP, HP, NCA, HCL HP Ltd., HP India, HCL HP, HCL HP, HP India, NCA, JVA, HP, HPI, the Control Group, HCL HP, HP, HP, HPI, HP, HCL HP, HP, HCL HP, HP, HP, HP, HP, the Control Group, HPL, HP, HP, the Control Group, SAAAP, HP, HCL HP's, HP, the Control Gupta, HCL HP, HP, the First Instalment', HCL HP's, HCL HP, SAAAP, the Final Instalment', HP, SAAP, HP, the Assessing Officer ( ˜AO', AO, JVA, AO, Nil, AO, HCL HP, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals, CIT, CIT, AO, JVA, JVA, HCL, JVA, the Supreme Court, Income Tax, JVA, JVA, AO, JVA, JVA, HIL, HP, JVA, Kettlewell Bullen and Co. Ltd., CIT, Calcutta, SC, Kettlewell Bullen and Co. Ltd., Fort Williams Jute Co., FWJC, KBCL, MBC, MBC, KBCL, KBCL, FWJC, FWJC, KBCL, KBCL, KBCL, FWJC, KBCL, KBCL, KBCL, FWJC, ITR, SC, Income Tax, Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd, SC, the Government of Burma, the Government of Burma, Annadhanam, Income Tax, ITR, Chartered Accountants, CA, Calcutta, AO, AO, Court, the Supreme Court, JVA, JVA, Court, JVA, Sections 48, Guffic Chem, Income Tax, SC, Income Tax v. Vatika Township P. Ltd., SC, Explanation &, CIT, B.C. Srinivasa, PNB Finance Limited, CIT, JVA, HP, HP, AO, HP, JVA, HP, HP, JVA, Court, JVA

EVENT: the Assessment Year, the Second World War

CARDINAL: 2, 6080.95, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14.3, 8., two, 9, 10, 2.2, 46.8, 11, 12, 14, 4.30, 15, 16, 17, 1, 2, 2, 18, 60.82, 19, 3, 2, 1.4. 98, 2, 20, 22, 54164.10, 55993.54, 23, 2, 128, 294, 24, 2, 25, 26, 1, 27, 53, six, 3,50,000, 3,50,000, 236, 28, 161, about 15, over 1/3rd, one, 29, 351, 210, 30, 31, 32, 1, 2, 33, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 35, 2, 332, 367, 37, 13, 24, 39, 307, 75, 40, 2, 2, 41, 6080.95, 2, 42

NORP: ITAT, Indian, Escrow, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT

GPE: Assessee, Assessee, India, the United States of America, India, India, India, Assessee, India, India, India, India, India, US, India, India, India, India, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Mugneeram Bangur, FWJC, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, India, Assessee, Delhi, Assessee, Bombay, India, Assessee, India, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, New Delhi, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee

WORK_OF_ART: An Agreement Regarding HCL HEWLETT-PACKARD LTD'

PERCENT: 26%, 25%, 26%

PRODUCT: Para 14.3, HP, HP India, HP India, HCL HP, Appellant, 386, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, CA, Calcutta, CA, HP HCL

MONEY: Seventeen Million Dollars, 17,000,00, eight million dollars, 8,000,000, 9,000,000

FAC: Oberoi Hotel Pvt

QUANTITY: 50,000 tons, over 43,860 tons, 225 per ton

LOC: Respondent

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //