The State of Karnataka, Police Sub Inspector, Pattanayakanahalli Police Station, Sira Taluk Vs. Rangaswamy

Decided On : Sep-09-2015

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 436 of IPC, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 213, Section 216, Section 218, Chapter XVII, Chapter XVII, Chapter XVII, Section 357-A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 357-A of the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 357, Section 357-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 357 Cr, Section 357 Cr, Section 357 Cr, Section 357, Act No. 5, Section 357, Section 357(A, Section 357-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure

ORG: U/S 378, the State P.P., Order of Acquittal, Tumkur, P/U/S. 436, IPC, State, Court, Rangaswamy, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, PWs, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Sri Vageesh Hiremath, Court, Amicus Curiae, Learned Amicus-curiae, Sri Siji Malayil, Court, Civil Court, Magistrate, Court, the Public Prosecutor, Court, Court, the Public Prosecutor, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Public Prosecutor, Court, Court, Government Advocate, Court, Court, ILR, State, Karnataka Vs, ILR, KAR, the Public Prosecutor, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The State of Karnataka, ILR, State, Karnataka Vs, ILR, Court, PWs, the Civil Court, PWs, Learned Amicus-curiae, Court, Courts, PW.2 &ldquo, Court, Court, Court, Court, the State Government, the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, The Victim Compensation Scheme, Learned Government Advocate, the State Government, Karnataka Legal Services Authority, the State Government, Court, Court, Court, the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Legal Services Authority, The Legal Services Authority, Magistrate, the State Government, the Central Government, the Victim Compensation Scheme, the State Government, Sections 357, Court, the State Government, the Courts of Law, Court, The Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, Amicus Curiae, Amicus Curiae

CARDINAL: 1, 3, 31.10.11, 1, 31.10.2011, 2, 11.11.2008, 3, 11, 6, one, 4, 2, 9, 3, 4, one, 6, 4, 9, two, one, 242/2, 211, four, 8, 2, 9, 5, 8, 8, 9, 1, 2, 9, one, 242/2, more than 10-12, 2, 9, 10, 9, 2, 9, 11, 12, 2, 4, 2, 9, two, 13, 14, 15, 2, 3, 10,000/-, 5,000/-, 3, 4, 16, 30,000/-, 17, 19.4.2012, 3, 3, 18, 19, 6, 31.12.2009, 357A, 31.10.2011, 20

GPE: P.C., S.C., PW, PWs.2, Karnataka, PWs.2, PWs.2, Cr, Cr, P.C., Cr, Cr, Cr, P.C.

WORK_OF_ART: Acquitting the Respondent/Accused, ANKUSH SHIVAJI GAIKWAD .vs

DATE: 43/2009, 09.11.2008, 10.11.2008, 4, 2006, 3904, 2006, 2335, months, 2006, 3904, 2006, 2335, 10.11.2008, 4, 6, 7, 4, 4, 09.11.2008, 10.11.2008, 4, 2011, 22.2.2012, 1973, 2011, 19.04.2012, 1973, Section 357(1, 2013, 2009, 31.12.2009, two to three years, 2011, 31.12.2009, today, 2011, 1973

TIME: about 12.30 p.m., 8.15 p.m. on, about 2.00 p.m., 8.30 p.m., 12.30 p.m., about 36 hours, 12.30 p.m., about 8.15 p.m., about 36 hours, 36 hours, 36 hours

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

PERSON: Sira Taluk, Sri Chetan Desai, Sri Siji Malayil, Sri, Siji Malayil, Sira, Sri, Chetan Desai, Abdul Rasheem, Abdul Rasheem, PWs, PWs, Victim, Sanneerappa, Sri, Vageesh Hiremath

NORP: HCGP

PRODUCT: Venkataraju, Vs, Venkataraju, PWs, PWs, P.W. 2, P.W. 1

LOC: PW.10