Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Subhash Pralhad Chaware and Others Vs. Vaishali Subhash Chaware @ Ku. Vaishali Suresh Jagtap

Decided On : Sep-14-2015

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

LAW: Section 12, the D.V. Act, Section 2, Section 2(f, Constitution, Section 2, Section 2(f

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3., No.3, 14.10.2013, 14, 72/13, 4, 14, 5, one, 1, 2, 22.12.2010, 3, 4, 1, 5, 6, 1, 1, 6., 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, Ten, 1, 8., 1, 9, 1, 1. 10, 11, 1, One, two, 72/13, 14.10.2013, 13, 1, 14, two, 15, 16, 15, 755, 17, two, 18, 1, 1, 10, 20, 19, 1

PERSON: Heard Shri Ghuge, Shri Kalwaghe, Buldana, Misc, Buldana, Misc, Crim, Motala, Buldana, Buldana, Rs.2,000/-, Misc, Buldana, stands.â, âwifeâ, Indra Sarma, V.K.V. Sarma, Indra Sarma, Indra Sarma's, Subhash

GPE: J.M.F.C., Tulsi Nagar, Sagwan Area, Rs.33,918/-

ORG: Court, Criminal Appeal No, Magistrate, The Protection of Women, Magistrate, Ananta Ingle, the Women Cell, no.1, D.V. Act, Magistrate, D.V. Act, Magistrate, Magistrate, Rs.5000/-, Schedule A, Magistrate, Criminal Appeal No, Court, 72/2013, Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Schedule-A, Court, Court, no.1, D.V. Act, The Protection of Women, Legislature, the Apex Court, D.V. Act, the Apex Court, Personnel, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Parliament, Criminal Writ Petition

DATE: 2012, 2005, 2012, the year 2008, ten years, one day, the month of September 2011, monthly, 14.10.2013. 12, 2013, 33 years of age, the year 1992, 2010

WORK_OF_ART: 27.2.2014

ORDINAL: firstly, first

FAC: Mahadeo Temple, Rajur

TIME: the first night

PRODUCT: no.1

NORP: D.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //