Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gurmit Singh Bagga and Others Vs. Indrajit Kaur Bagga and Another

Decided On : Aug-04-2015

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Order I Rule 10(2

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 211/2008, 30/1/2014, 109, 3, 211/2008, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 4., 1, 211/2008, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3, 498, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 56, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 1, 111, 1, 2, 111, 1, 2, 3, 5., 1, 1, 6, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1, 4853, 8, 1, 1, 4853, 4853, 4853, 211/2008, 111, 211/2008, 211/2008, 99, 9

DATE: 5/3/2012, 2011, 5/3/2012, the year 1992, the year 2010, 55, 2005, 5/3/2012, 30/1/2014, 2005, 2012, 15/4/2014, 2012, 4853/2012, 2012, 2012, 5/3/2012, May, 5/3/2012, 4853/2012, 4853/2012

GPE: R.C.S., J.D., R.C.S., J.D., J.D.

ORG: Pune, Additional Sessions, Pune in Criminal Appeal, Civil Suit, Pune, the Protection of Women, Learned Civil Judge, Pune, Pune, Appeal u/s 29, the Protection of Women, the Sessions Court, Pune, Counsel, State, the Protection of Women, the Family Court, the Protection of Women, Court, Court, Court, Single Bench, Coram, Court, the Writ Petition, Order, 05/03/2011, the Hon'ble Court, the Application/Say, Court, Court, Court, Court

PERSON: Gurmit Singh Bagga, Indrajit, Kaur Bagga, Iqbal Singh Bagga, Bruno, Exh, Exh, Exh, Addl, Jasmeet Singh, Counsel, Jr Divn, Addl, R. M. Savant, Pune, Petitioner

TIME: 1 i.e.

NORP: german

LOC: Pune, Exh

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //