Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Armada (Singapore) Pte.Ltd.) and Another Vs. Ashapura Minechem Ltd. and Another

Decided On : Sep-08-2015

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Small Claims Procedure of the L.M.A.A.â, Section 17, the English Arbitration Act, Section 34, Section 34, the Notice of Motion No.2444 of, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 42, the Arbitration Act, Section 42, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 15, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 34, Section 42, the Arbitration Act, Section 15(1, Section 3(1)(o, Section 22, the Merchant Shipping Act, Merchant Shipping Act, the Indian Law, the Arbitration Act, Section 42, the Arbitration Act, Section 42, the Merchant Shipping Act, Section 406, the Merchant Shipping Act, Section 15(1, Section 22, the US Bankruptcy Code, Section (f, the Merchant Shipping Act, Section 48, the Arbitration Act, Section 48, Section 47, the Arbitration Act, Section 48(1)(a, the Arbitration Act, Section 48, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 48, Section 42, the Arbitration Act, Section 42, Section 42, the Arbitration Act, Section 34, Section 48(2, the Arbitration Act, Section 22, Section 22, Section 49, Section 22, Section 22, Section 48(1)(a, Section 406, the Merchant Shipping Act, Section 48, the Arbitration Act, Merchant Shipping Act, Section 48, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 48, Section 48, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 22, Chapter IV of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act

CARDINAL: 1, 49, two, 2, 638, 3. Notices, 374, 656, 196, 284, 4, 5, 6, 32, 28, 28, 28, One, one, fifty thousand, 8., 28, 9, 10, 11, three, three, 4,875, 12, 13, 37, 1, 1, 1, Quarter, 15, two, 16, 17, 19, 20, one, 22, 23, 24, 406, 407, 25, 2, 3, 26, 27, 28, 29, four, 30, 227, 31, three, 1, three, 32, 2, 45, 147, 148, 156, 158, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, three, two, 39, 40., 41, 1, 2, 3, 42, 181, 43, 638, 638, 373, 374, 656

ORG: Arbitration Petition No.1359, the Arbitration Petition No.1360, Sections 47, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Chamber Summons Nos.639, the Arbitration Petition Nos.1359, Arbitration Petition No.1359, COA, The Arbitration Petition No.1360, COA, Arbitration Petition No.1359, the Arbitration Petition No.1360, Arbitration Petition No.1359, Gencon Form, C.O.A., Arbitration, Charterers, Umpire, Arbitrators, C.O.A., Arbitration, the Court of Principal Senior Civil, Jam-Khambhalia, Jam-Khambhalia, Queens, the Gujarat High Court, the Gujarat High Court, Special Civil Suit, Principal Senior Civil Judge, Court, the Gujarat High Court, English Courts, the Arbitration Petition No.1359, the District Court, Jam-Khambhalia, COA, Gencon, COA, the Arbitration Petition No.1360, Court, Court, Court, Notice of Motion No.2390, the Court of Principal Senior Civil, Court, the Court at Gujarat, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, Court, Court, Court, Registrar, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, Court, COA, COA, COA, the Directorate General of Shipping, COA, the Charter Party, COA No.1/4/2008, Armada Shipping S.A., the Disponent Owners, the Charter Party, Singapore Court, Court, Court, Court, Notice of Motion No.2444, Notice of Motion No.2390, the Gujarat High Court, Court, Court, the Directorate General of Shipping, the Directorate General of Shipping, Directorate General of Shipping, the Directorate General of Shipping, COA, Court, Court, Tropic Shipping Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, Renusagar Power Co. Ltd., General Electric Co., AIR 1994, SC, the Court at Singapore, Deloitte, Touche LLP, Reorganisation Services, Touche LLP, the Scheme of Arrangement, the United States Bankruptcy Court, Deloitte, Touche LLP, Shook Lin, the High Court, Reliance, Sections 227B, COA, the High Court of Singapore, the Supreme Court, Shri Lal Mahal Ltd., Courts, Court, Pol India Projects Limited Vs, Aurelia Reederei Eugen Friederich GmbH, Arbitration Petition No.76, Directorate General of Shipping, the High Court of Singapore, the Directorate General of Shipping, Court, Court, Court, Notice of Motion No.2390, the Court at Gujarat, Court, Tropic Shipping Co. Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Court, Tropic Shipping Co. Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court of Singapore, Deloitte, the High Court of Singapore, COA, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Directorate General of Shipping, COA, the Directorate General of Shipping, Court, the Supreme Court, Shri Lal Mahal Ltd., Pol India Projects Limited, Court, the Directorate General of Shipping, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Supreme Court, Pol India Projects Limited, the Delhi High Court, Penn Racquet Sports Vs, ILR, the Court of India, Shri Lal Mahal Ltd., Court, Pol India Projects Limited, Court, Court, the Chamber Summons Nos.639 of 2011, Chamber Summons Nos.639, Arbitration Petition Nos.1359

DATE: 2010, 2010, 48, 1996, February 2010, 2011, 2011, 2013, 2013, 2010, 1360, 2010, 2014, 2014, 2013, 2010, February 2010, 12th April 2008, 2010, February 2010, 4th April 2008, 2010, 2010, 2010, 12th April 2008, 30th September 2008, November 2008, November 2008, November 2008, 2008, 11th November 2008, 2008, 1207, 2008, November 2008, 28th November 2008, 2008, 15th December 2008, November 2008, 28th November 2008, Jam-Khambhalia to, 2008, 29th December 2008, 29th December 2008, 2009, 7 days', 1996, 8th June 2009, 21st August 2009, February 2010, monthly, monthly, 16th February 2010, 2010, the year 2010, 1996, 16th February 2010, 2010, 4th April 2008, 16th February 2010, 2010, 1996, 14, 11th January 2013, 2012, 2012, 11th February 2013, 1996, 15th April 2013, February 2010, February 2010, 31st May 2011, 1985, 2nd June 2011, November 2008, 5th December 2008, 12th April 2008, 21, 1st June 2009, 1st June 2009, 11th January 2013, 2012, 2012, 1996, 30th September 2008, November 2008, 2002, 30th April 2013, 1st June 2009, 29th May 2009, 1st June 2009, 16th July 2009, August 2009, 30th April 2013, 30th April 2013, 1st June 2009, 2014, 47, 8th April 2015, 2012, 1996, 11th January 2013, 2012, 2012, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1996, February 2010, 37, 1996, 1996, 2011, 1985, 44, 16th February 2010, 1996, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2013, 2013, 2014, 2014, 2010, 1360 of 2010

ORDINAL: 16th, 16th, 16th, 4th, 4th, 11th, 11th, 16th, 16th, 16th, 3rd, 3rd, 14th, second, 6th

WORK_OF_ART: the Miscellaneous Application Nos, English Solicitors

GPE: London, Gujarat, London, Bench, UK, p.a., p.a., England, Yantai, Longkou, China, US, Gujarat, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Jamnagar, Gujarat, Gujarat, Singapore, Gujarat, New Delhi, Switzerland, India, US, Singapore, New York, the United States of America, Singapore, Singapore, India, Gujarat, Singapore, Singapore, India, Delhi

LANGUAGE: English, English, English

PERSON: Michael Baker, Jamnagar, Jamnagar, Jamnagar, Michael Baker-Harber, @5%, Civil Misc, Qingdao, Rizhao, Lanshan, herein inter, Doctor, Narichania, Kothari Global Limited, Andrew Grimmett, Winter Scott, Winter Scott, Andrew Grimmett, Andrew Grimmett, Sarjit Singh Gill, Sarjit Singh Gill, Andrew Grimmett, Krinshnan Choudhary, Progetto Grano Spa, Doctor, Andrew Grimmett, Shri Lal Mahal Ltd.(supra, International Limited

MONEY: 28,196,000, 37,353,524.10

PERCENT: 4.5%

LOC: West Coast India, South East Asia, the Southern District

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

EVENT: the Notice of Motion No.2444

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //