Sanjay Bajirao More and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra through its Principal Secretary Tribal Development Department and Others

Decided On : Oct-19-2015

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 342 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, Bombay Reorganisation Act, Constitution, Constitution, section 10

PERSON: Anoop V. Mohta, Petitioner No.2, Schedule, Thakur, Order, Schedule, Order, Tribes, Schedule, Thakar, Scheduled Tribe, Ma-Thakur, Ka-Thakar, Ma-Thakar, Thakur, Thakar, Ka Thakur, Ka Thakar, Ma Thakur, Ma Thakarâ, vii, viii, Bigar Magas, Jagdish R. More, Dharmendra R. More, Balwant Jalgaonkar, Varsha Dhanawat, Court, Dharmendra Ramakant More, xi, Court, Kum, Amruta Vijay, Amruta More, Court, Sharad Gulab, Amruta Vijay, Madhuri Jadhav, Amruta Vijay, Dharmendra, Pramodkumar Narendrakumar Wagh, Anr, L.J. 949)(Anoop V. Mohta, K. R. Shriram, Thakar, Scheduled Tribe, Komalsingh Thakur, Bench, Mridula Bhatkar, Pramodkumar Narendrakumar Wagh, â(i, Schedule Tribe, Scheduled Tribe, Schedule Tribe, Schedule Tribe, Tulshiram Ghanshyam Thakur, Shankar Ghanshyam Thakur, Shankar Ghanshyam, Thakur, Thakur Scheduled Tribe, Thakur Scheduled Tribe, Thakur Scheduled, Vimukta Jatis, Nomadic Tribes, Backward Classes, Caste Certificate, Madhuri Nitin Jadhav, Anoop V. Mohta, A.A. Sayed, Bhoir Vs, L. J. 626)(Anoop V. Mohta, M. S. Sonak, âobiterdictaâ, Pramodkumar N. Wagh

DATE: J. 1, 28 May 2015, 5 January 1924, 9 December 1925, 6 September 1950, 1950, 1950, 25 September 1956, 1956, 1950, 1960, 27 July 1977, 1976, 18th September, 1976, 1976, 1976, 1976, 44, 14 June 1976, 1 July 1978, 7 July 1983, 1950, the month of July 1993, 6 October 1994, 15 November 2000, 16 August 2001, 1950, the month of November 2003, one day, 23 February 2004, the year 2004, 17 September 2004, 22 November 2004, 7 March 2005, 30 April 2005, 18 May 2005, 31 May 2005, 15 June 2005, 11 October 2005, 19 June 2006, 4 September 2006, 2006, 2 September 2006, 15 September 2006, 12.07.2006, 24/25 June 2004, 2006, 6 October 2006, 5032, 2006, a period of, two weeks, 18 October 2006, the month of October 2006, 6 February 2007, 2006, the year 2007, 2600 of 2007, 14 October 2010, 2010, 2 February 2011, 23 August 2011, 18 October 2011, 14 September 2012, 30 November 2012, the same day, 11 March 2014, 7409, 2013, 26 February 2014, 26 March 2014, 18 July 2014, 10 June 2014, 28 October 2014, 6 February 2015, 2014, 2014, 2014, 12 April 2015, the month of May 2015, June 2015, 3 June 2015, 23 June 2015, 29 June 2015, 2011, 2010, 2010, 2014, 2 weeks, 2015, para-13, eight weeks, 26523, 2015, 21 September 2015, the year 1956, the year 1976, 2000, 2014, eight weeks

CARDINAL: 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 21, 2, five, 108, 108, 1, 2, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 2, 2, 4, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1., 5031, 1, 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 10,000/-, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 9, 2, 2, 1, 2, 25000, 1, 3, 4, 753, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2015(4, 2, two, 2, 4., 5, 5, one, two, 6, 6, 6, 8, 25, five, 25, 4.6.1929, 2.4.1937, 2.6.1959, 30.5.1966, 8., 9, 10, 11, 4, 15, 12, 13, 13, 14.

ORG: the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee-Respondent No.2, Petitioners, âThakur-Scheduled Tribeâ, the Competent Authority, Petitioners, Petitioner No.1, âThakurâ, State, Bombay State, Parliament, Thakur, Ka-Thakur, Parliament, Maharashtra State, âThakurâ, âThakurâ, Competent Authority, Petitioners, Tribal Development, the Scrutiny Committee, Shri Vijay Bajirao, Nashik, the Competent Authority, Security Guard, Scrutiny Committees, Thakur, Sanket Vijay, Scrutiny Committee, Scrutiny Committee, Vigilance Cell, Scrutiny Committees, Nashik, the Scrutiny Committee at Nashik, Thakur, Scrutiny Committee, Court, the Scrutiny Committee at Nashik, Petitioners, this High Court, Petitioners, State of Maharashtra, State of, the Scrutiny Committee, Dharmendra, The Scrutiny Committee, the Scrutiny Committee at Nashik, Thakur, the Scrutiny Committee at Nashik, Court, the Writ Petition, the Apex Court, this High Court, the Scrutiny Committee at Nashik, the Scrutiny Committee, the Scrutiny Committee at Nashik, the Apex Court, Civil Appeal, the Scrutiny Committee at Nashik, Amruta, the Scrutiny Committee at Nashik, Vandana Ramakant More, the Apex Court, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, SLP, the Supreme Court, Petitioners, the Scrutiny Committee at Nashik, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Apex Court, the Judgment of this Court, Maharashtra and Ors, Court, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Court, Apex Court, Kum, Apex Court, SLP, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, Petitioners, Records and Proceedings, Court, earlier Supreme Court, the High Court Judgments, Amruta Vijay, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Amruta Vijay More Vs, Maharashtra and Ors, Civil Appeal No.7230, SLP, Caste Screening Committee, Priti, Pranav Prakash Mandlik Vs, Court, Nagpur (Coram : B.R.Gavai and Smt, Apoorva Nichale, the Writ Petition No.326 of, 30.1.2015, the State of Maharashtra, Respondent-Authority, State, Apex Court, Special Leave Petition No, the Special Leave Petition, the Caste Scrutiny Committee, Petitioners, the Special Leave Petition, the State Government, Special Leave Petition, the State Government, Hon'ble Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Respondents, the High Court, Thakur, Tulshiram, Nana @ Narendrakumar Wagh, Nana @ Narendrakumar Wagh, The High Court, the High Court, the State Government, Caste Scrutiny Committee, SLP, Petitioners, De-Notified Tribes, the Caste Certificate/Caste Validity Certificate, The Caste Scrutiny Committee, Certificate, the Competent Court/Authority, the Caste Scrutiny Committee, Caste Scrutiny Committee Validity Certificate, the Caste Validity Certificate, the Scrutiny Committee, Petitioners, the Supreme Court, the High Court, State, the Special Leave Petition, Judgment, The State Government, the Supreme Court, the Special Leave Petition, The State of Maharashtra and Ors, The Scrutiny Committee/Authority, Supreme Court Judgments, the High Court, Authority, the Scrutiny Committee, the Competent Court/Authority, the Scrutiny Committee, Authority, the Supreme Court, Scrutiny Committee, the Scrutiny Committee, Court, Supreme Court, The State Government, Scrutiny Committee, the Supreme Court, Emphasis, earlier Supreme Court, Caste Scrutiny Committee, the Respondent-Authority

GPE: Bombay, States, Dharmendra, Dharmendra, L.J., C.R., Pramodkumar, Petitioner No.2, M.S.Sonak, Ahmednagar, Thane, Colaba, Pramodkumar N. Wagh, petitionersâ&trade, petitionersâ&trade

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first

NORP: Talukas, Thakur, Thakur, Dipak R., Petitioners, Hindu, Maharashtra, Thakur, Maharashtra, no.8, Dhule, Dhule, Hindu, Thakur

FAC: Old Bombay State, Madhuri Nitin Jadhav Vs

WORK_OF_ART: The Scheduled Castes, The Scheduled Tribes Orders, Shri Rajendra Bajirao More, the Writ Petition No, Rule on Writ Petition No., the Caste Validity Certificate, Officers

EVENT: the Second Schedule to Act No, para11

PRODUCT: Talukas, Talukas, Judgment, matter.â