Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/s. Darshan Jayant Builders and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others

Decided On : Nov-26-2015

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Indian Partnership Act, the MHAD Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 22(m, Section 37(1)(AA, the MRTP Act, the MHAD Act, The MHAD Act, Section 37, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: S.C. Dharmadhikari, Petitioner no.2, Petitioner no.1, Dadasaheb Bhadkamkar Marg, Jariwala Chawl, Sankeshwar Darshan, Sheth Motisha Lane, C.S.No.251(pt, Girgaon Divn, Building No.71-71A, Culcuttawala Chawl, Bhadkamkarr Marg, Virag Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Anklesaria, Anklesaria, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Anklesaria, Anklesaria, Anklesaria, Joseph Bain D'Souza, Azad Maidan, Mahapalika Marg, Sd/-, Abhiraj Girkar, Anklesaria, Anklesaria, no.12, Carol Harlow, Gabriele Ganz, Tulzapurkar, Petitioners, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Kadam, Sawant, Sawant, Petitioners, Kadam, Kadam

ORG: Respondents, Petitioners, the State Government, the Department of Housing and Special Assistance, the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, Respondent no.3, The Respondent no.5, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, City Survey Nos.251, Tardeo Division, Calcuttawala Estate, Dwarkadas Building, Respondent no.3, Petitioners, the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai, DCR, Petitioners, DCR, LOI, LOI, REPAIRS, MHADA, Dwarkadas Chawl, DCR, Maharashtra/Urban Development Department Notice No, TPB, No.1011, The Government of Maharashtra, Urban Development Department, Notice, Reconstruction, MHADA, Joint Venture, the Joint Venture Redevelopment Scheme, MCGM, FSI, FSI, DCR, the Architect and Structural Engineer, the Building Proposal Department of MCGM, MHADA, Carpet, Carpet, FSI, FSI, Joint Venture, Joint Venture Scheme of Redevelopment, Development Control Regulation, D.P. Reservations, MCGM, Joint Venture Scheme, Joint Venture, MCGM, Commencement Certificate, NOC, Joint Venture Policy, NOC, This Letter of Intent, NOC, MCGM, Sd/-, M.B.R., R. Board, LOI, Petitioners, Petitioners, LOI, Engineer, Building Proposals of Respondent no.4, Petitioners, LOI, LOI, Petitioners, Petitioners, Court, Court, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, LOI, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, LOI, Resolution No.6636, Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority, MHADA, MHADA, MHADA, LOI, the Housing Department, DCR, the Housing Department of the Government, the Urban Development Department of State Government, MHADA, DCR, Government, the Development Control Regulations, Petitioners, LOI, Petitioners, MCGM, MCGM, MHADA, LOI, Petitioners, LOI, Petitioners, LOI, LOI, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Gorkha Security Services Vs, Respondents, Resident Executive Engineer, Respondent no.4 Board, Petitioners, DCR, Government, DCR, MHADA, DCR, DCR, the Development Control Regulations, Maharashtra Regional, MHADA, LOI, Petitioners, Petitioners, LOI, MHADA, DCR, DCR, Government, MHADA, DCR, Government, LOI, MHADA, MHADA, Government, Respondents, LOI, Petitioners, Petitioners, MHADA, MHADA, MHADA, Court, Petitioners, LOI, Court, Petitioners, Petitioners, MHADA, LOI, MHADA, MHADA, Petitioners, MHADA, Petitioners, LOI, DCR, MHADA, MHADA, FSI, MHADA, MHADA, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Jayant Achyut Sathe Vs, Respondents, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, the Housing Board, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, the State Government, MHADA, DCR, MCGM, Urban Development Department's Notification, DCR, DCR, The Housing Department, Court, Housing Department, Housing Department, Court, Town Planning, Greater Mumbai, Corporation, Corporation, MHADA, carpet area, FSI, FSI, MHADA, carpet area, FSI, FSI, MHADA, MHADA, MHADA, Maharashtra, MHADA, MHADA, MHADA, Reconstruction Board, Petitioners, the Executive Engineer, No.1011, Mumbai Board, Petitioners, Government, DCR, MHADA, MHADA, Petitioners, Government, LOI, Government, DCR, LOI, Petitioners, MHADA, MHADA, LOI, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, Court, LOI, Court, DCR, the Government (Condition no.9, DCR, the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, Petitioners, DCR, LOI, MCGM, NOC, Mumbai Board, LOI, Petitioners, MCGM, Government, DCR, MHADA, MHADA, LOI, Petitioners, Government, MHADA, the Housing Board/authority, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, MHADA, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Union of India, Hindustan Development Corporation, Government, Court, G.O, Petitioners, Government, Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra, MHADA, Petitioners, LOI, MHADA, MHADA, Government, Petitioners, Government, MHADA, Government, Petitioners, MHADA, Petitioners, Gorkha Security Services, Gorkha Security Services, the Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, MHADA, LOI, Government, Court, LOI, Petitioners, Petitioners, Court, Court, Petitioners, Court, MHADA, MHADA, Mumbai Board

CARDINAL: 2., 3., 2, 4., 252, 253, 5, three, 2.2, 2.4, 6, 164, 38 to 40, 29, 109, 010, 252(pt, 253(pt, 79, 91, 008, 1, 19.05.2009, 2, 3, 4, 1., 2., 27.88, 300, more than 300.00, 70.00, 753.00, 300, 4, 5., 6., 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 12, 8, 3.6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 4, 36, three, 19, 9 to 12, 41, two, 20, 21, 22, 23, three, one, 37, 37, one, 1AA, 001, 1, 300, 2, 300, 3, 2.5, 2:1, 2, 1, 4., 5, 24, 25, 37, 26, 27, 33-34, 35, 64, 327, two, 36, 64, 327, 28, 29, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33

DATE: 4 March 2014, 1932, 1976, 1888, 1991, 29 October 2010, October 2010, 26.03.2010, 30.03.2010. 5, 17.08.2010, 1976, 1976, 29 October 2010, November 2011, 1st November 2011, 29 November 2012, 2013, 19 June 2013, 29 November 2012, 17 January 2014, 17 January 2014, 4 March 2014, 2013, 24 October 2013, more than three decades, 19 May 2009, 23 August 2012, 19 May 2009, 9 December 2009, 19 May 2009, 29 November 2012, 2013, 29 November 2012, Today, 2006, 4 September 2008, 1976, 39, 25 January 1999, 1976, 36, 36, 1976, 30 days, 1976, 2 years, 29 October 2010, 9 December 2009, 26 March 2010, 30 March 2010, 17 August 2010, 19 May 2009, 36, 29 October 2010, 1976, 1994, 1990, November 2012, 14 November 2014, 14 November 2014

GPE: Mumbai, Mazgaon, 09.12.2009, Mumbai, Mumbai, India, Delhi, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Island City, Mumbai, Mumbai, India

FAC: Jariwala Chawl, Mumbai Building Repairs and

WORK_OF_ART: D2" Divn/MBRRB's, Petitioners and Respondent no.4, the Constitution of India

LOC: the Island City, Respondent no.4, the Island City, the Island City, the Island City, the Island of City

PERCENT: 60%, 3. 60%, over 20%, 80%, 50%, over 10%, 40%

ORDINAL: third, First, first

PRODUCT: Annexure-F, Articles 21, Vs

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //