Chandrakant P. Sanghvi and Others Vs. Chandrakant P. Sanghvi and Others

Decided On : Dec-22-2015

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 9, Section 8, the Arbitration Act, Section 8, Section 11, Section 9, Section 2(1)(e, Section 2(1)(e, Section 9, Section 9, the Arbitration Act, Section 9, Section 9, the Arbitration Act, Section 11, Section 9, the Arbitration Act, Section 2(1)(e, Section 11, Section 9, the Arbitration Act, Section 2(1)(e, the Arbitration Act, Section 37, Section 2(1)(e, the Arbitration Act, Section 37, Section 37, Section 2(1)(e, the Arbitration Act, Section 9, the Arbitration Act, Section 9, the Arbitration Act, Section 2(1)(e, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 37, Section 42, the Arbitration Act, Section 32(c, Section 9, Section 11, the Arbitration Act, Section 11, the Arbitration Act, Section 11, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 37, Section 9, the Arbitration Act, Section 37(2, Section 17, Section 37(2, the Arbitration Act, Section 2(1)(e, the Arbitration Act, Section 2(1)(e, the Arbitration Act, Section 17, the Arbitration Act, Section 37, Section 9, Section 42, Section 37, the Arbitration Act, Section 20(2, Section 20(3, Section 20(3, the Arbitration Act, Section 37, the Arbitration Act, Section 2(1)(e, the Arbitration Act, Section 37(2, Section 37, Section 2(1)(e, the Arbitration Act, Section 37, Section 9, Section 37, Section 42, Section 107, Section 37, Section 37, Section 2(1)(e, the Arbitration Act, section 9, section 9, section 9, section 9, section 2(1)(e, section 2(1, section 9, section 9, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, section 9, the Arbitration Act, section 42, section 9, Indian Arbitration Act, section 11, section 37, section 2(1, section 42, section 11, section 37, section 2(1)(e, the Arbitration Act, section 42, section 9, section 11, section 11, section 2(1, Section 42, section 11, the Arbitration Act, section 17, section 37, section 37, section 2(1, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, section 42, the Arbitration Act, section 11, section 37, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, section 42, section 37, the Arbitration Act, section 37, section 42, the Arbitration Act, section 16(2, section 17, section 9, section 34, section 37, section 17, section 42, section 42, the Arbitration Act, section 37, section 37, section 9, the Arbitration Act, section 9, section 2(1, section 36, section 37, section 2(1)(e, section 37, section 37, section 37, section 9, section 2(1, section 37, section 37, section 9, section 37, section 9, section 37, section 9

CARDINAL: 1, 5, 2., 3, 3, nos.3, 5, 2, 4., three, one, 5, 6., 5, 5, 8, 9, 10, 2, 5, 1.45, 2, 5, 2, 2, 1.45, 2, 5, 11, 541, 12, 13, 2, 14, 5, 248, 15, 16, 5, 17, 18, 3, 4, 5, 5, 8, 19, 20, 11, 5, 21, 7, two, four, one, 15, two, 22, 23, 23, three, three, three, three, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 1, 3, 22 to 25, 28, 9, 552, 97, 98, 29, 7, 13, 30, 3, 17, 19, 21, two, 31, 47, 3, 4, 32, 33, 34, 35, 54, 36, two, 10000, 38, two, two, 39, 40, 41, one, 96, 99, two, 43, ten, only one, 5, 106, 45, two, 10, 26, 23, 26, 33, 47, 47, 47, 15, 20, 49, 3, 96, 100, 71.5, 106, 23, 26, 33, 50, 5, 51, 52, 5, 1 to 5, 6 to 8, 6 to 8, 6 to 8, 6 to 8, two, 11, 1 to 5, 7, two, four, 55, 23, three, three, three, 6 to 8, 56, two, about more than 25, two, two, 6 to 8, 57, 1 to 5, one, 10, 5, 59, 1 to 5, 60, two, 5, 61, 5, 62, 63, II, 1 to 5, 64, 65, 4, 105, 66, 5, 67, 69, 71, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, 72, 73, 5, 74, 16(3, 75, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, two, 79, 5, 82, 83, 84, 85

ORG: Court, the Letters Patent to institute, Court, the Letters Patent, Court, Court, the Arbitration Petition No.1036, Arbitration Actâ, Court, the Maharashtra Erectors Pvt, no.1, no.2, no.1, the Sanghvi Group, no.1, no.1, no.1, MOU, MOU, Civil Suit, Junior Division, Pune, the Maharashtra Erectors Pvt, Court, Pune, HUF, Court, Suit No.50, a Civil Revision Application, Court, Sanghvi Movers Ltd., the Maharashtra Erectors Pvt.Ltd., a Civil Suit, Sanghvi Movers Ltd, Sanghvi Movers Ltd., Civil Revision Application, Court, Court, Sanghvi Movers Ltd, no.2, Pune, no.1, Court, Court, Notice of Motion, the Arbitration Application, Court, Court, Arbitration Application, Court, Arbitration Application No.34, Court, the Notices of Motion No.167 of, Arbitration, Chamber, Letters Patent Petition, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Letters Patent Petition, XII, Arbitration Application, Court, Court, Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, the APS Group, Joint, Sanghvi Movers Ltd., Maharashtra Erectors Private Ltd., the APS Group, CPS Group, Maharashtra Erectors Private Ltd., the Sanghvi Movers Ltd., Maharashtra Erectors Private Ltd., Court, E-1, nos.6, Court, Nariman Point, Court, Court, the Court of Civil Judge, Pune, the Court of Civil Judge, Pune, Court, Pune, Pune, Enam Asset Management Co. Pvt. Ltd., Deutsche Bank, Court, the Mumbai Branch, Deutsche Bank, Court, Arbitration Application No.34, Court, Court, a Civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Appellate Forum, Court, the Supreme Court, State, Associated Contractors, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Bharat Aluminium Company Vs, Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services INC., Court, Konkola Copper Mines (PLC, Lloyds of India Limited, Arbitration Petition, Court, Court, Upendra Kantilal Thanawala, Chamber Summons, Leave Petition, Arbitration Petition (L, Companies, Court, Pune, the Arbitration Petition No.1036, the Letters Patent Petition, Court, Court, the Arbitration Appeal No.3, Court, Court, Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Arbitration Appeal No.3, Court, Court, Court, Arbitration, Court, the Arbitration Application, Court, the Division Bench, the Letters Patent Appeal No.45, Notice of Motion, Arbitration Application No.34, Maker Chambers VI, BSE, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, Reliance, Court, Court, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, Learned, Reliance, Reliance, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, Court, Letters Patent, the Supreme Court, Bharat Aluminium Company Vs, Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services INC., the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Bharat Aluminium Company Vs, Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services INC., the Supreme Court, Court, Pune, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Executive Engineer,, Road Development Division, Panvel, Atlanta Limited, AIR 2014 SC, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 2007, SC, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, Court, Family Settlement and Arrangement, Court, Court, Court, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Supreme Court, Bharat Aluminium Company Vs, Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services INC., the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Appellate Court, Court, Court, Court, Reliance, the Supreme Court, State, Associated Contractors, the Supreme Court, Executive Engineer,, Road Development Division, Panvel, Atlanta Limited, Court, the City Civil Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Executive Engineer,, Road Development Division, Panvel, Atlanta Limited, E-1, nos.6, Court, the Court of Civil Judge, Pune, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Pune, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, XII, the Letters Patent, XII, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, XII, the Letters Patent, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Family Settlement and Arrangement, Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Bharat Aluminium Company, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Unitoral Modern Law, International Commercial Arbitration, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Bharat Aluminium Company, the Supreme Court, Konkola Copper Mines (PLC, Stewarts and, Lloyds of India Limited, Supreme Court, Harmony Innovation Shipping Ltd., Gupta Coal India Ltd., Supreme Court, Bulk Trading S.A., Supreme Court, Bharat Aluminium Company, the Supreme Court, Bharat Aluminium Company, Division Bench, Konkola Copper Mines (PLC, Upendra Kantilal Thanawala, XII, Pune, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Bharat Aluminium Company, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, L and T Finance Limited, Vardhman Chemtech Ltd., Ors, Arbitration Petition (L) No.1460, Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, State, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Supreme Court, Executive Engineer,, Road Development Division, Panvel, Atlanta Limited, AIR 2014 SC, the District Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Court, Supreme Court, Executive Engineer,, Road Development Division, Supreme Court, Executive Engineer,, Road Development Division, Panvel, the High Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, XII, Pune, the High Court, the Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, the High Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, the Supreme Court, Executive Engineer,, Road Development Division, Panvel, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Appellate Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Appellate Court, the Appellate Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Appellate Court, Pune, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, XII, the Letters Patent, XII, the Arbitration Petition No.1036 of, the Letters Patent, Letters Patent Petition, XII, the Letters Patent,, Arbitration Petition No.1036, Court, Court, Court, Arbitration Petition No.1036

DATE: 31st July 2013, 2013, 1996, the month of January 2005, 14th January 2005, 8th January 2006, 8th January 2006, April 2006, 11th March 2010, 12th April 2010, 13th May 2010, 30th October 2010, 9th December 2010, 2010, 10352 of 2011, 24th December 2010, 50 of 2011, 2012, 2011, 67 of 2011, 13th September 2011, 1800 of 2011, 5, 1996, 55 of 2013, 13th February 2013, 13th February 2012, 34 of 2012, 1996, September 2012, 10th January 2013, 31st January 2013, 2013, 2012, 1st February 2013, 2013, 28th January 2013, 28th February 2013, April 2013, 2013, 20th June 2013, 2013, 2012, 1st February 2013, eight weeks, 2013, 2013, 31st July 2013, 1996, 31st July 2013, 2013, August 2013, 2013, 1996, 28th February 2013, 2012, 1996, 28th February 2013, April 2006, August 2013, 2013, 1996, September 2012, 1996, 1996, 1996, 2015, 11, 13, 16, 20, 2012, 9th July 2013, 2013, 2013, 8, 8th January 2013, 2012, 2012, 2012, 9, 12, 2013, 2010, 19th March 2010, 30th October 2010, 30th October 2010, 1996, 2010, 19th March 2010, 34 of 2012, 23rd January 2013, 2013, 2012, 1st February 2013, 2013, 2012, 37, 20th June 2013, 42, 1908, 1996, 44, 2014, 1093, 25, 46, 1996, 11th March 2010, 19, August 2013, 1996, 97, 98, 1908, 1996, 54, 1996, 1996, 1996, 30th October, 2010, 30th October, 2010, 1996, 1996, 58, 11th March, 2010, 30th October, 2010, 20th June, 2013, 1st February, 2014, 20th June, 2013, 30th October, 2010, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1996, 6th September, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2002, 1996, 7th January, 2014, 2013, 70, 23rd October, 2015, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1996, 76, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1093, 80, 81, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1908, 1908, 1996, 2013, 31st July 2013, 2013, 31st July 2013, 2013, 2013, today, 2013, a period of, six weeks, today

PERSON: Sathe, Directors, Tulsi Tanti, Tulsi Tanti, Tulsi Tanti, Order, Sanghvi Hi-Lift Pvt, Sriram Panchu, R.A. Kapadia, Anoop V. Mohta, J., N.K. Sodhi, Sathe, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Tulsi Tanti, Sathe, Sathe, Shree Ram Builders and Ors, Sathe, Devitre, Devitre, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Nariman Point, Anr, Anr, Anr, Anr, Sathe, Sathe, Anr, Anr, Sathe, Anr, Sathe, Anr, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Tulsi, Tulsi, Chandigarh, D'vitre, Tulsi, Tulsi, Sathe, July,2013, Anr, Sathe, D'vitre, Devitre, Anr, Sathe, Anr, Anr, Devitre

PRODUCT: no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1 i.e.

PERCENT: 75%

WORK_OF_ART: a Memorandum of Understanding, the Deed of Family Settlement and Arrangement, the Family Settlement and Arrangement

ORDINAL: 24th, 7th, 3rd, 26th, 24th, third, first, 3rd, 7th, second, first, first, second, first, first, 3rd, third, 9th, first, second

GPE: Pimpri, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Pune, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Pune, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Gaziabad, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Pune, Mumbai, Mumbai, Enercon, Enercon, Bihar, Mumabi, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Enercon, Bihar, Bombay, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Delhi, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, India, India, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Enercon, India, London, London, Thane, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Principal District

EVENT: the Notice of Motion

LOC: Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Mumabi, the District Judge, the District Judge, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, the Principal District, the Principal District, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune

NORP: Hon'ble, Hon'ble

FAC: Nariman Point, Bhatia International

TIME: 11.00 a.m.