Prompt Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra, to be served on the Secretary Ministry Industries Energy and Labour and Another

Decided On : Jun-11-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 10-A of the Employees' Compensation Act, section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A(2, Section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A, Section 10-A - (1, Act 15 of 1933, Rule 13 of the Act, section 10A, the Section 19 of the Act, Section 30, Section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A, Section 10-A, Section 10-A, Section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A(4, Section 30, Section 10-A, Section 30, Section 10-A, Section 30, Section 10A, Section 22, Section 10-A, Section 10-A, Section 10-A(4, Section 10-A(4, Section 10- A (4

CARDINAL: 1, 2, one, thirteen, One, 3, 4, 257, 2, 1., 10A, 8, 3, 4, 6, 2, 19, 3, 1, 19, 2, 3, 2, 19, 8, two, One, 9, 10, 4, No.3, 5, 4, 4, 6, 9, 11, 4, one, 12, 13, 14

GPE: Workmen, Kesnand, India, Workmen, Workmen

DATE: 1923, the year 2012, 18 December 2012, 30 days, 4 May 2013, 1970, thirty days, thirty days, 10B, 15 years of age, the ------------- 19, monthly, 30 days, 4 March 2013, four weeks, today

ORG: Bhartiya Sanskriti Darshan Trust, M/s Avinash Construction Company and M/s RMC Readymix, Avinash Constructions, Division, the Patna High Court, –, the Civil Court, Division, the Patna High Court, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the State Government under Section 20, the Labour Courts, Learned Counsel, Court, Court, the High Court, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation

LOC: Pune

ORDINAL: 4th

PERSON: Shelke, Shelke, Shelke, Shelke, Shelke, Vaidya, Vaidya, suo motu, Guru Bachan Singh Vs, Kango, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, suo motu, noticee, Guru Bachan Singh, Petitioner, Roy, Ka Thili, Kango, Petitioner

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act