V.G. Quenim and Another Vs. Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd.

Decided On : Jul-03-2014

Court : Mumbai Goa

LAW: Order 39 Rule 2-A, Order 39 Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 2-A and Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 39 Rule 2-A of the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 2-A and Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 2-A. Learned Counsel, Order 39 Rule 2-A, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Order 39 Rule 11, Order 39 Rule 11 and Rule 2-A of the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 11, Order 39 Rule 11, Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 11(2, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39, Rule 11, Order 39, Order 39, Rule 11, Rule 11, Rule 11, Rule 11, Order 11, Rule 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 1, Rule 21, Rule 11, Order 39, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 11, Order 39 Rule 2-A, Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 39 Rule 2-A and Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, two, 05.09.2001, three, three, 30.11.2007, 8., 1(f, two, 06.06.2012, 04.05.2013, 9, 1(f, 2, 2004(1, 822, 8, 10, two, two, 7, 6, 249, 1, 728, 2, 533, 11, 1, 2, 1(f, 12, 1, 13, 7, 8, 6, 13.05.2002, two, 15, 14/2000, 21/2000, 7, 8), 7, 7, 14, four, 15, 1, 2, 11, 2, 16, 2, 17, 2004(1, 7, 11, one, 11(1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 18, 19, 20, 1(f, four, 21, 22, four, four, four, 23, 2, 04.05.2013, 3

GPE: Counsel, Miramar, Miramar, Nos.1(a, Counsel, Miramar, Miramar, Smt, A.I.R., S.C., Counsel, Rs.1,00,000/-, Rs.1,00,000/-

PERSON: Impugned Order, Heard Shri Y.V. Nadkarni, Misc, Order, Order, Order, Order, Order, Order, Y.V. Nadkarni, Order, Order, Order, Order, Order, Mulchand Surajmal Modi, Order, Samee Khan, Bindu Khan, J. Vasudevan, T. R. Dhananjaya, Rani Sonabati Kumari, B.M. Bhattacharjee, Retd, Order, Panaji, Mukul Rohtagi, Vassudev Keni, Vini Prasad Keni, No.7, Rohtagi, Nos.6, Ranjit Kumar, Krishnan Venugopal, Nos.6, Respondent Nos.6, Order, Orders, M. R. 822, Mulchand Surajmal Modi, Ratnakar D. Patade, Asha M. Joshi, Tirlok Nath Mahajan)6, Order, Order, Order, Order, Order, Sonabati Kumari, Order, Order, Order, Order, Order, Order

ORG: Civil Judge Senior Division, Respondents, the Appellants-Petitioners, Respondents, Learned Counsel, Respondents, Rs.71,03,759.07p, Rs.2,97,58,558.49p, Defendants, the Plaintiffs, the Plaintiffs, Panjim, Order, the Plaintiffs, Court, the Apex Court, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Trial Court, M/s. Vilman Packaging, Plaintiff, the Apex Court, Defendants, Trial Court, Plaintiff, Trial Court, Judgments, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, inter alia, Defendants, Court, Bank Guarantee, Order, 06.06.2009, Respondents, Court, Appeals, Court, Trial Court, Court, Apex Court, No.3533 - 3540, Apex Court, Court, the Trial Court, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Trial Court, the Apex Court, the Defendants-Petitioners, the Apex Court, Court, Learned Counsel, the Apex Court, Counsel, Defendants, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Court, Learned Counsel, Bank Guarantee, Plaintiff, Learned Counsel, Defendants, Learned Counsel, Order, Learned Counsel, the Apex Court, Learned Counsel, Bank Guarantee, Plaintiff, Learned Counsel, Court, the Orders of the Court, Learned Counsel, the Apex Court, the Trial Court, Learned Counsel, Bank Guarantee, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Court, Learned Counsel, Counsel, the Judgment of this Court, Ramavatar Surajmal Modi, the Judgment of the Gujarat High Court, The District Collector, Sale Committee, Gujarat Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd., Respondents, Order, Learned Counsel, the Orders of the Court, Learned Counsel, Courts, Order, Learned Counsel, Order, Court, Court, Learned Counsel, the Order of the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Learned Counsel, the Apex Court, the Civil Court, Counsel, the Orders of the Court, Learned Counsel, Court, the Trial Court, Learned Counsel, Trial Court, Court, Counsel, Court, Learned Counsel, the Apex Court, Rajendra Prasad and Ors, State of Bihar, Major Genl, Russel Estate Corporation, Appeal, Court, the Apex Court, the Writ Petition, Plaintiff, Court, Order, the Trial Court, the Plaintiffs, the Apex Court, the Special Leave Petition, Judgment, the Apex Court, the High Court, M/s Vilman Packaging Private Limited, House, the Mining Machinery, Court, the High Court, Court, Chalta Nos.11, P.T. Sheet No.116, House, the Court of Civil Judge, House, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Trial Court, Trial Court, Respondents, the Trial Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Order, Court, Court, Court, Judgments, Court, Bank Guarantee, Court, Orders, Court, Ramavatar Surajmak Modi, Court, Court, Court, Court, Courts, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Defendants, Petitioners, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, the Judgment of the Apex Court, AIR 1961 SCC 221, State of Bihar, Order, Court, Court, Order, the Judgment of the Apex Court, inter alia, Court, the Trial Court, Respondents, Bank Guarantee, the Order of the Court, Court, Order, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Bank Guarantee of a Nationalised Bank, Court, the Apex Court, the Plaintiffs, Court, inter alia, Bank Guarantee, Defendants, Judgments, Shri Doctor, Respondents, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Trial Court, Appeals, the State Legal Services Authority, the Goa State Legal Services Authority

DATE: 2000, 05.09.2001, 05.09.2001, 13.12.2001, 19.04.2002, 14.12.2009, 2012, 13.04.2012, more than three months, 1998, 1995, 1996, L.J. 1214, 1961, 1993, 14.12.2009, 13.04.2012, 14.12.2009, 11 days, 06.01.2010 ending, 20.02.2010, 19.04.2002, today, 1978, 1436, 18.12.2007, 13.04.2012, 4) Rule

ORDINAL: third, third, third, third, third, third

WORK_OF_ART: Orders, Order the Plaintiff, Orders, Orders, the Orders of the Court, Orders

PRODUCT: No.1, 8/2000, Para 7, Suits, Judgment

FAC: Bombay