Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/s. United White Metals Limited Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Decided On : Jul-25-2014

Court : Mumbai

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 12(5, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-N(5, Section 59, Section 2-A of the, Section 2-K, Section 2-K, section 25N, Industrial Dispute Act, Section 59, the Central Act, the Bombay Act, the Central Act, the Bombay Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 59, Section 59, Section 59, Section 25-N, Section 25-N(5, Section 25-N, Section 25-N(5, Section 25-N(5, Section 25-N(5, Section 2-A of the, Section 2-K, Section 2-A of the, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-N of the, Section 25-N, Section 25-N(5, Section 12(5, Section 10, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10, the Appellant M/s. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act

CARDINAL: 1, two, 2, 252, two, two, 3., 116, 235, 116, two, 4., 116, 65, 60, About 110, 51, 235, almost 201, 201, 5., 34, 31, 34, only four, some 31, two, 7, almost 253, 7, 116, four, 7, 253, 35, only four, 7, 8, 7, 7, over 100, 9, almost 100, 10, 100, 100, 11, 7, 12, 13, 59, 14, 28, 29, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 253, 35, 7, 7, 21, almost 100, 8, 22, 23, 1, 625, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, No.4, 7, 31, Twenty Five thousand, 7, 7

NORP: Petitions

PERSON: Order, Order, Bharatiya Kamgar, Karmachari Mahasangh, Bhartiya Kamgar Sena, Respondent Nos.4, N.T. Tahsildar, Respondent No.8, Respondent Nos.4, Bukhari, Naik, Respondent Nos.4, K.V. Joseph, Respondent Nos.4, Respondent Nos.4, Joseph, Joseph, Joseph, Joseph, Bukhari, Naik, N.B. Tahasildar, Bukhari, Naik, Respondent Nos.4, Respondent Nos.4, Bukhari, Naik, Kulkarni, Kulkarni, Reference, Kumar Bara, S.10, K.P. Krishnan, Naik, R.B. Sawant

DATE: 22 December 2006, 1947, 29.12.2003, 22 December 2006, 29 December 2003, 2004, 2004, 1971, 30 August 2005, 17 September 2004, one year, 8 December 2005, 2006, 8 December 2005, 3 April 2006, 2006, 5 March 2007, 18 January 2006, 13 January 2006, 13 January 2006, 13 January 2006, 22 December 2006, 29 December 2003, 13 January 2006, 30 August 2005, 3 April 2006, 2006, 5 March 2007, 29 December 2003, 13 January 2006, between December 2003, January 2006, 1947, 30 August 2005, 29 September 2004, 29 September 2004, 3 April 2006, 2006, 30 August 2005, 30 August 2005, 30 August 2005, No.11/2004, 181/2004, 30 August 2005, 30 August 2005, 30 August 2005, 2006, one year, 17 September 2004, one year, 17 September 2004, 8 December 2005, one year, 5 March 2007, one year, 29 December 2003, 13 January 2006, 29 December 2003, 13 January 2006, 29 December 2003, 13 January 2006, 29 September 2004, 29 September 2004, 1947, 28.12.2003, 29 December 2003, 30 August 2005, 3 April 2006, one year, 13 January 2006, 2000, 6, 1223, 2013, 16.9.2013, a period of, three months, 29 December 2003, 29 December 2003, 29 December 2003, 1947, 1947, year 2006 to the year 2014, Rs.25,000/-, Rs.25,000/-, four weeks, today, 31 December 2015, 32, 2007, 2007, eight weeks, eight weeks, today

GPE: Labour, Mumbai, India, Mumbai, Bombay, Reference, Kalyani, Single, Bombay

ORG: Otis, UWML, BKS, Complaint, ULP, BKS, Complaint, ULP, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, Otis, UWML, the Labour Court, Complaints, Otis, UWML, Otis, UWML, The Labour Court, Complaints, Otis, UWML, Otis, UWML, the Labour Court, Complaints, the Specified Authority under Section 25-N of the, Otis, UWML, UWML, the Industrial Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Otis, UWML, the Industrial Tribunal, UWML, Court, the Division Bench, Court, UWML, BKS, UWML, Voluntary Retirement Scheme, the Appropriate Authority, UWML, Respondents, Respondents 4, the Industrial Tribunal, Otis, UWML, the Specified Authority, UWML, Otis, Authority, Reference, the Labour Court, Otis, UWML, Authority, UWML, the Division Bench, Court, Otis, UWML, the Specified Authority, UWML, Otis, Respondents, the Specified Authority, the Labour Court, The Labour Court, the Labour Court, Court, Otis, UWML, the Industrial Tribunal, the Labour Court, Labour Court, Complaint, UWML, Otis, UWML, Nos.4, Nos.4, UWML, Otis, Court, Otis, Nos.4, the Labour Court, Complaint, the Industrial or Labour Court, the Labour Court, Otis, UWML, the Labour Court, PULP Act, Otis, UWML, the Labour Court, Unions, United White Metal Limited, Court, Tribunal, the Industrial Court, Court, Complaints, Complaints, ULP, Court, Complaints, Complaints, The Labour Court, Otis, UWML, the Labour Court, the Industrial Tribunal, Court, Labour, Industrial Court, Court, Tribunal, Petitioners, the Labour Court, Petitioners, the Labour Court, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Industrial Tribunal, Court, the Industrial Tribunal, the Division Bench, Court, Division Bench, the Industrial Tribunal, Otis, UWML, Court, Otis, UWML, UWML, Court, Authority, Petitioners, Otis, UWML, Otis, UWML, UWML, Tribunal, Tribunal, Respondent Nos.4, Otis, UWML, Otis, UWML, Otis, Nos.4, the Industrial Tribunal, Court, UMWL, Otis, the Industrial Tribunal, MRTU, PULP Act, the Industrial Court, Court, Otis Elevator Company, United White Metal Limited, Otis Elevator Company, Court, Otis Elevator Company, Otis Elevator Company, Court, Complaints, Respondents, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Cipla, Court, Court, Petitioners, the Labour Court, the Industrial Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Court, Petitioners, Administrative, Court, Government, Indian Tea Association, CLR, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government, Emphasis, the Supreme Court, Court, Petitioners, the Supreme Court, State, AIR 1960, Petitioners, Voluntary Retirement Scheme, the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, Petitioners, the Supreme Court, M/s. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., State of Jharkhand and Ors, Respondents, M/s. Lafarge, Respondents, the Appellant Company, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Otis, Otis, Otis, Otis, UWML, Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Petitioners, Otis, UMWL, MRTU, UMWL, Otis, the Industrial Court, MRTU, the Industrial Tribunal, the Industrial Court, MRTU, the Industrial Court, the Industrial Tribunal, Nos.4, the Registry of this Court, Registry, Nos.4, the Industrial Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Nos.4

FAC: MRTP, MRTP, MRTP

LOC: Single, Single, Single, Single, Single

PRODUCT: Voluntary Retirement, Voluntary Retirement, Voluntary Retirement, the Respondent 4 to 7, Respondent, Reference, Reference

ORDINAL: first, first, second, fourth

WORK_OF_ART: Reference, Reference

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //