Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Twinkle Jatin Khanna @ Twinkle Akshay Kumar Vs. Anita Advani

Decided On : Jul-30-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 91, the Criminal Procedure Code, the 2005 Act, Section 2(s, section 263, the Indian Succession Act, Article 24, the Domestic Violence Act, the Indian Succession Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3., 2, 4., 268, 5, 6, 8, 9, 268, 247, 10, 268, 11, 2010)10, 31 to 33, 32, 2008)7, 14, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 14, 1, 1, 1, 9, 1, 1, 1, 1, 13, 4, 300, 14, 268, 2000)7, 425, 15, 16, 2007)9SCC 625, 17, 18, 263, 3, 333, 2008)10, 489, 268, 19, 267, 268, 271, 268, 271, 2, 21, 267, 268, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 268, 27, 28, 268, 29, 33, 268, 34, 35, 271, 36, 37

DATE: 17 February 2014, 1388, 2012, 18th July 2012, 19th June 2012, 2012, the 6th October, 2002, the month of November 2012, December 2012, 2012, 27th November 2012, 28th of January 2013, the month of February 2013, 25th of February 2013, 26 February 2013, 30th January 2013, 28th of February 2013, 28th of January 2013, 15th June 2013, 28th of January 2013, 1st October 2013, 17 February 2014, ' 33, 2004, 2004, 2004, 2004, 2004, 2008, 1994, 1925, 1990, 25, 1959, 20.” 20, 1925

ORG: the Learned Commissioner of Taking, Court, Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, the Protection of Women, this Court in Criminal Petition No., Metropolitan Magistrate, Court, the Bombay High Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Review, Department, Justice, Justice, Supreme Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, the Protection of Women from Domestic Violation Act 2005, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Wikipedia, Google, Court, Parliament, Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Miscellaneous Application, the Division Bench, The Division Bench, the Division Bench, The Division Bench, The Division Bench, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Consumer Action Group Vs State, Court, Reliance, Supreme Court, Coal India Ltd Vs Saroj, Court, Reliance, Supreme Court, S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu Vs Jagannath, Counsel, Court, Reliance, Supreme Court, Counsel, Supreme Court, Court, the Bombay Court Fees Act, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, the Master (ADMINISTRATION, Court, Justice, Court, High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate

PERSON: Rajesh Khanna, Rajesh Khanna, Dwarkadas, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Ila Vipin Pandya Vs Smita, Paragraphs 13, Ila V Pandya, Fereshte Sethna, Shri Nariman, Shri Nariman, Krishnakumar Birla, Rajendra Singh Lodha, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Kumar Mishra, Elizabeth Anthony Vs Mchel Charles, John Chown Lengera, G. Gopal Vs C.Bhaskar, Ashirwad, Ila Vipin Pandya, Basanti Devi Vs Ravi Prakash Ramprasad, Counsel, Saraf

ORDINAL: 3rd, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third

NORP: Hon'ble, Indian

GPE: Counsel, Counsel, New Delhi

LOC: Velusamy, Single

TIME: one night

EVENT: the 2005 Act

WORK_OF_ART: the Miscellaneous Application, the Miscellaneous Application No, the Miscellaneous Application No, the Miscellaneous Application No, the Miscellaneous Application, the Miscellaneous Application No, the Miscellaneous Application No, the Miscellaneous Application No, Miscellaneous Application

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //