M/s. Exide Industries Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others

Decided On : Aug-04-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the BST Act, section 61, the BST Act, Section 5, Section 5(3, the BST Act, Section 5(3, the CST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, the CST Act, the Companies Act 1956, section 5(3, the CST Act, the BST Act, section 62, the BST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, the BST Act, the BST Act, section 61, the BST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, Article 286 of the Constitution of India, section 5, the CST Act, the BST Act, section 61, the BST Act, Article 286 of the Constitution of India, Article 366, Article 286(1, Article 286(1, Article 286(2, The CST Act, Article 286(2, Section 5, section 5, Article 286 of the Constitution, section 5, the CST Act, Article 286, the BST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, the BST Act, the BST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, section 2(g, section 5(3, the CST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, the BST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, the CST Act, the CST Act, the CST Act, Article 286(2, section 5, section 5, the CST Act, section 2(g, section 2(g, the CST Act, section 5(3, section 2(g, section 5(3, section 2(g, section 5(3, the CST Act, Section 2(g, the CST Act, section 5(3, section 5(3, the CST Act, the BST Act, section 5(3, Section 5(3, Section 5(3, Section 4, Section 3(a, Section 4(2, Section 5(3, Section 2(g, Section 2(g, Section 2(g, Section 5(3, Section 5, Section 2(g, Section 3, Section 4(2, Section 5(3, Section 2, Section 5(3, the CST Act, Section 2(g, Section 2(g, the CST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, the BST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, the Constitutional Bench, section 5(3, the CST Act, the Amending Act 103 of, section 5(3, the CST Act, Act 103 of, Section 5(3, the CST Act, Section 5(3, the CST Act, section 44, section 5(3, the CST Act, section 5(3, the CST Act, Section 5(3

ORG: B.P. Colabawalla, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal, MSTT, Respondents, the Writ Petition, MSTT, 5th March 2004, M/s. Crown Corporation Pvt Ltd, Submarine Navy Batteries, the Algerian Navy, Submarine Navy Batteries, Submarine Navy Batteries, the Algerian Navy, the Algerian Navy, Submarine Navy Batteries, Respondents, the Algerian Navy, M/s.Crown, the Algerian Navy, Submarine Navy Batteries, Submarine Navy Batteries, MDN, MDN, MDN, Batteries, Batteries, the End User, EIL, the End User, the Algerian Navy, Submarine Navy Batteries, the Submarine Navy Batteries, the Submarine Navy Batteries, Petitioners, the Algerian Navy, Submarine Navy Batteries, the Petitioner Form ', Submarine Navy Batteries, M/s.Crown, the Algerian Navy, the Algerian Navy, the Algerian Navy, Submarine Navy Batteries, Algerian Navy, M/s. Crown, the Supreme Court, Consolidated Coffee v/s Coffee Board, the Supreme Court, Consolidated Coffee, the Assessing Authority, Sales Tax for de-novo, the Supreme Court, Consolidated Coffee, Revision, BST Act, the Supreme Court, Consolidated Coffee, the Supreme Court, Saraf Trading Corporation Etc, VST 1, SC, The State of Karnataka Vs, VST 1, SC, M/s. Crown, the Algerian Navy, the Submarine Navy Batteries, Appeal, MSTT, MSTT, Appeal, Appeal, MSTT, this Writ Petition, MSTT, Submarine Navy Batteries, Crown, MSTT, the Supreme Court, Consolidated Coffee, MSTT, the High Court, Court, goods.—, State, State, State, Parliament, Parliament, State, the State Government, Parliament, Parliament, Aviation Turbine Fuel, the Central Government, the State Legislature, Court, Submarine Navy Batteries, Crown, Submarine Navy Batteries, Crown, the Submarine Navy Batteries, M/s Crown, Submarine Navy Batteries, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, Submarine Navy Batteries, M/s Crown, Submarine Navy Batteries, Crown, the Algerian Navy, M/s. Crown, State, the Supreme Court, Consolidated Coffee, Crown, M/s Crown, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, M/s Crown, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, the Submarine Navy Batteries, Crown, M/s Crown, Crown, Petitioners, the Writ Petition, State, the Export Control Order, State Trading Corporations, State Trading Corporations, State Sales Tax, the Central Sales Tax, the Central Sales Tax Act, M/s Crown, the Submarine Navy Batteries, Crown, inter alia, Clauses, Crown, the Submarine Navy Batteries, the Submarine Navy Batteries, the Submarine Navy Batteries, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, the Submarine Navy Batteries, Crown, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, Submarine Navy Batteries, the Supreme Court, Consolidated Coffee Ltd., Coffee Board, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Coffee Board, “if, the Coffee Board, the Coffee Board, the Coffee Board, Court, Court, the Sale of Goods Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Balabhagas Hulaschand, Court, Central Sales Tax Act, Court, “if, the Coffee Board, the Central Sales Tax Act, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Crown, Submarine Navy Batteries, the Algerian Navy, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, the Submarine Navy Batteries, Crown, M/s Crown, the Algerian Navy, Submarine Navy Batteries, MSTT, the Supreme Court, State, Karnataka Vs, VST 1, SC, Saraf Trading Corporation Etc, VST 1, SC, Azad Coach Builders Pvt.Ltd., “bus, Lanka Ashok Leyland Ltd., “bus, the Assessing Authority, “bus, “bus, the Assessing Authority, Sales Tax (Appeals, the Karnataka Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Karnataka preferred Appeals, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sterling Foods, Vijaymala Cashew Co., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Statement of Objects, F.3/Ed, State, Submarine Navy Batteries, Crown, M/s Crown, Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, Submarine Navy Batteries, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, Crown, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, Crown, the Submarine Navy Batteries, the Algerian Navy, M/s Crown, the Algerian Navy, Crown, the Algerian Navy, Saraf Trading Corporation, the Assessing Authority, the Assessing Authority, Department, the Assessing Authority, the Kerala Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Azad Coach Builders Pvt.Ltd., Azad Coach Builders Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Central Sales Tax, Crown, the Algerian Navy, the Supreme Court, MSTT, the Writ Petition

ORDINAL: 25th, 14th, 5th, 5th, 5th, 14th, 26th, 24th, 14th, first, 5th, 5th, 5th, 5th, 5th, 5th, first, 5th, 5th, 5th

DATE: May 2011, 1959, 2011, 1956, 25th May 2004, 14th September 2004, September 2004, 2004, 22nd May, 2004, 22nd May, 2004, March 2004, 15 days, the week, year, 25th May, 2004, March 2004, 14th September, 2004, 20th March, 2006, March 2004, September 2004, 22nd May 2004, 22nd May, 2004, the year 2003-04, 31st May, 2006, 31st May 2006, May 2008, 1980, 31st May 2008, 2008, September 2008, 5, September 2009, 25th May 2011, 2011, 2011, 2010, 2010, 25th May 2011, 22nd November 2012, 25th May 2011, 22nd November 2012, 22nd November 2012, this behalf.” 20, March 2004, 22nd May 2004, 14th September, 2004, section 5(3, 5th March, 2004, 14th September 2004, 1976, 2005, 1976, March 2004, September 2004, March 2004, March 2004, March 2004, March 2004, 14th September 2004, 22nd May 2004, 25th May 2004, September 2004, 1980, 1930, 1978, 1976, 1956, 1930, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1956, March 2004, 14th September 2004, March 2004, 22nd May 2004, September 2004, 2010, 2010, 2011, 2011, 1986, (1996, 1997, 1976, 1976, Para 27, 25-10-2010, March 2004, 5th March, 2004, 1963, 36, 25th May 2011, 22nd November 2012, 2011

PRODUCT: Respondent No.3, Crown, Crown, Crown, Crown, Crown, Crown, Crown, Agreement, CCPL, F O B Mumbai, Crown, Crown, Crown, Crown, Crown, Form N-14-B, Crown, Respondent No.3, Crown, Crown, Respondent No.3, Respondent No.3, Respondent No.3, Respondent No.3

CARDINAL: 2, 3., 1, 4., 1, 1, 240, 10, 2, 3, 11, 5, 18.1, 18.2, 18.3, 18.4, 18.5, 6, 14, 8, 9, 10, 3, 11, 12, 13, 4, 6, 5., 6, 14, No.3, No.3, 38, 2, 36, 9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 1, 2, 1, 3, 29, 19, 1, 2, 3, 1, 4, 3, 5, 1, 5(1, 5(3, 21, one, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 3, 27, one, one, 28, one, one, 29, 30, 3, one, 2, 164, 2, 939, 37, 207, more than one, one, one, 3, 4(2, 31, 19 and 20, 32, two, two, 36, 9, 38, 2, 344, 33, one, two, two, 3, 349, 1, 10, 1, one, 27, three, 28, 34, 35, 37

PERSON: Ankhad, Petitioner, Ankhad, interalia, “M/s. Crown”, Petitioner, Buyer, Buyer, Supplier, Supplier, Buyer, c. Nature, Buyer, Buyer, Supplier, Supplier, Petitioner, Bill Nos.1, Rs.11,12,21,500/-, Rs.11,12,21,500/-, Petitioner, Petitioner, Petitioner, Ankhad, Petitioner, Petitioner, Bangalore, Venugopal, “sale”., Petitioner, Ankhad, Bench, K. Gopikrishnan Nair, Reasons, Ed, B.J./120/2010

GPE: India, Algeria, Algeria, Algeria, India, Algeria, India, India, Kerala, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Karnataka, Balabhagas, Kerala, Assessee, Columbo, Assessee, Sri Lanka, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, India, Sri Lanka, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee

LOC: the Petitioner on

WORK_OF_ART: Kilo Class Submarines, Batteries, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, this Writ Petition, the Writ Petition, Official Corrigendum No

LANGUAGE: English, English, French, English

NORP: French, French, Indian, Indian, Indian, French

FAC: the Official Gazette, India if:-, this Writ Petition, ARE-1