Minochar @ Minoo Aspandyar Irani Vs. Deenyar Sheriar Jehani and Others

Decided On : Aug-22-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 9, section 9, Allahabad 34, Har 523, Section 257 of the Contract Act, section 259, section 56, the Contract Act, Section 54, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 21 of the 1996 Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 21, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 21 of the, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, the AandC Act 1996, Section 17 of the Act, Section 9, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, section 69, Section 24, the Arbitration Act, Section 8 is--"in, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 9 of the Act, Section 9, Section 16 of the Partnership Act 1932, Section 56, the Indian Partnership Act, Indian Partnership Act 1932, the Partnership Act, Section 12(d, the Indian Partnership Act 1932, section 9, Right to Information Act, section 69(3, the Indian Partnership Act 1932, Respondent 1 to 5, section 9, section 11, section 9, section 9, Indian Partnership Act

CARDINAL: 1, 1 to 5, 8, 3., 5, 11, 13, 4., 17, 22, 5., 1 and 2, 6, 1 to 5, 7, 1 to 5, 2, 1 and 2, less than half, 1 to 4, 8., 1 to 5, 9, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, 10, 1 to 5, 5, 1 to 5, 9(d, 11, 1, 5, 1 to 5, 12, 1 to 3, 17, 22, 5, 17, 13, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, 14, 1, 2, 15, 5, Rs.2, 1 to 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 16, 1 to 5, 6, Rs.2, 17, 18, 1 to 4, 19, 20, 1 to 4, 19, 5, 1 to 5, 21, 1, 5, 5, 22, 32, 4., 15, 142, 18, 26, 254, 5., 6., 363, 7, one, 39, 570:"Where, 936, 23, 5, 160, one, 14, 15, one, 16, 423, 773, one, one, two, 25, 26, 1 to 5, 565, 2004)3, 155, 17, 18, 19 and 20, 20, 17 and 18, two, two, two, 18, 27, 6, 5, 6, 28, 6, 29, 2, 5, 2, 30, 2, 1, 2, 2, two, 31, 1 to 5, 6, 6, 5, 1 to 5, 6, 6, 5, 33, 6, 1 to 5, 34, 13 to 17, 13 to 17, 14, 15, 16, 17, two, two, 2, 64, 206, 36, five, 37, 54, 5, 38, 5, 5, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 5, 45, 5, 5, 9, 5, 6, 6, 6, 1 to 5, 6, 5, one, 6, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 50, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, 6, 5, 51, 1 to 5, 6, 1, 5, 1 to 5, 52, 5, 1 to 5, 6, 6, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, 5, 5, one, 1, 5, 55, 1 to 5, 5, 56, 5, 5, 5, 57, 5, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, 59, 5, 1 to 5, 1 to 5, 60, 5, 5, 1 to 5, 5, 5, 61, 62, 14, 19, 1 to 5, 6, 63, 1 to 5, 64, 5

ORG: the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court Receiver, Leo's Boulangerie', no.1, Respondent no.5, no.5, Leo's, Mezzanine, Leo's Boulangerie', no.1, the Central Bank of India, Colaba Branch, Leo's Boulangerie', Rs.2,00000/-, Leo Boulangerie, Learned Senior Counsel, Cafe New York, the Coffee House, Leos Boulangerie, Partners, Court, Halburys Laws of England, Madras High Court, Kollu Narasayya, Court, “3, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Richards v. Davies, Court, Allahabad High Court, Sharda Prasad AIR 1986, no.1, AIR 1955, AIR, Court, the Patna High Court, Kamal Chaudhary, Rajendra Chaudhary, AIR, Court, G. Ram Chandrayya, AIR 1952, Court, Court, AIR, Court, Court, the Allahabad High Court, the Tagore Law Lectures, Glassington Vs, undertaking”., Chemical Company Vs, Hardman, Supreme Court, M/s Sundaram finance Ltd, AIR 1999, SC, Supreme Court, Firm Ashok Traders, Sundaram Finance, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, M/s Firm Ashok Traders, Court, Court, Court, inter alia, Court, M/s Sundaram Finance Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Supreme Court, State, Tamilnadu, AIR 2011 SC 3470, Petitioner and Respondent No, Leos, Leos, no.1, no.2, no.1, Bank of India, the central Bank of India, Supreme Court, Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd., AIR 2003 SC 2252, Court, Court, M/s. Brahmaputra Realtors Pvt, Arbitration, the Arbitration Proceedings, AIR 2006 KERALA, Legislature, S.9, S.9, S.9, S.9, Court, S.9, Court, S.9, Lion, Leo's Boulangerie, Reliance, Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Hudson, Court, Supreme Court, Firm Ashok Traders, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Petitioner and Respondent No, Respondent Nos.1, the Income Tax Officer, the Income Tax Department, Respondent Nos.1, Respondent Nos.1, Central Bank of India, Colaba Branch, the Petitioner and Respondent No, the Petitioner and Respondent No, the Petitioner and/or Respondent No, Cafe New York, LeoTouch, Leo's Boulangerie, Respondent Nos.1, Court Receiver, the Supreme Court, Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Guwahati High Court, Respondent Nos.1, the Respondent Nos.1, Respondent Nos.1, the Respondent Nos.1, Leo Touch, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Supreme Court, Sunderam Finance Limited, M/s. Firm Ashok Traders, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Madras High Court, Allahabad High Court, Khade Ram and Ors, Arbitration Petition

DATE: 1996, the year 1975, 30th September 1997, every year, 31st March, 2008, the year 2003 to 2007, Rs.10,000/- per month, August, 2013, last 5 years, 3rd September, 2013, 19th January 2006, 21, 1st April 2010, 30th November 2011, 21st July 2011, the month of March 2009, 11th June 2013, August 2013, 21st July 2011, December, 2012, September 2013, September 2013, the year 1995 to 2004, several years, 20 year old, 16 year, 12, 14, 15, 16, years, 1831, 1968, 1976, 24, every year, that year, 1891, the year 2008, more than 5 years, 2008, 2013, April 2008, today, 1996, 1940, 19th January 2006, the year 2008, 20 years, day, about 12 years ago, the year 2008, the month of June, 2013, 2 3, no.6., 32, 24th June, 2014, years 2009-2010, 2013-2014, the financial year 1996-97, the financial year 2002-2003, the financial year 2012-2013, 12,85,46,668.10, 10th Sept. 1996, 1st Jan. 1998, last several years, the last five years, 1940, 35, 2013, 25th July, 2014, 53, the same day, 44, 46, June 2013, 47, 1996, 48, the year 2008, the assessment year 2009-2010, 2013-2014, 49, 19th January, 2006, 19th January, 2006, last several years, January, 1998, last several years, last several decades, 2008, 54, last several years, the financial year 1996-97, the financial year 2002-2003, the financial year 2012-13, 58, 1996, 31st December, 2013, 31st March, 2008, 30th January, 2008, ten days, the month of February, 2008, April, 2008, June, 2013, today, 1996, 30th January, 2008, 12, 1932, last several years, the last ten years

PERSON: Cafe Universal', Cafe Universal, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Cafe Universal', Tulzapurkar, Leopold, Rs.2,50,000/-, Leopold, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Karri Venkata Reddi, Jagadisa Aiyar v. Kuppusami, Subbarayndu v. Adinarayudu, Raghunath Dass, John Leach, Khaderan Ram, Paragraphs 13 to 16, Ram Niwas, Madras, Abani, Mukherjee v. Nand Kishore, Prem Prakash Kapoor, Govind Ram Kapoor, Moti Lal v. Badrinath, Nethi Iswarayya, Shree Kripa Shanker Jaiswal, Pat 75, Mumtaz Ali, Kasim Ali Vol XL, Banerji, Thwaites, Leopold, Madon, Counsel, Subramaniam, Subramaniam, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Shyam Sundar, Respondent Nos, Madon, Counsel, Counsel, Coffee House, Leos Boulangerie, Behram S. Irani, Coffee House, Coffee House, Shahnaz F. Jehani, Leos Boulangerie, Leopold, Rs.1,85,90,527/-, Jayesh H. Pandya, Guwahati High, Arb, Versus M/s. G.G. Transport, Shoney Sanil V. M/s., Leo, Madon, Madon, Mumtaz Ali, Madon, Tulzapurkar, Madon, Tulzapurkar, Madon, Tulzapurkar, Madon, Leo, Leopold, Anr, Madon, Petitioner, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Madon, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Coffee House, Petitioner, Madon, Jayesh Pandya, Respondent Nos, Petitioner, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Leos Boulangerie, Tulzapurkar, Madon, Leos Boulangurie, “Leopold”. Be, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Madon, Karri Venkata Reddy

PRODUCT: no.1, Leopold, no.1, the Model Law, Rs.1,45,66,117/-, Leopold

GPE: no.4, no.3, Canada, India, Fort, Mumbai, no.4, Canada, India, no.3, Rs.1,00,000/-, Mumbai, M.R., Nihal Chand, Rajasthan, L.R., Counsel, New York, New York

PERCENT: 15%, 10%, The remaining 75%, more than 100%, 25%, approximately 1200%, approximately 20%, 25%, 25%, approximately 1200%, 1200%

NORP: Iranian, Iranian, Indian, Sheonarain Jaiswal, Indian

ORDINAL: 26th, 26th, first, 2nd, first, 2nd, first, first, 2nd, first, first, second, first, third, first, second, third, first, first, 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, 6th, Secondly, Thirdly, Secondly, third, third, third

LOC: Rustom Manzil, Goa, Rustom Manzil, Specific Performance

LANGUAGE: English

MONEY: 427

WORK_OF_ART: Gurumukh Das Saluja

QUANTITY: 2 km, about two km