Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Farzana Ansari Vs. Abid Ali Ansari
Decided On : Sep-29-2014
Court : Mumbai Goa
LAW: Section 12, Section 18 of the Act, Section 20 of the Act, Section 12, Section 18 of the Act, Section 20 of the Act, Section 125, Section 12, Right to Information Act, Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 125, Section 125, Section 12, Section 2(a, section 2(g, Section 3 of the Act, Section 125, Section 125, Section 26 of the Act, Sections 18, 19, Section 26, Section 20 of the Act, Section 125, Section 12, Section 125
CARDINAL: 1, 2. Rule, 3., five, 5., 6., 23, 8., 9, four, 10, No.1, 11, 12, seven, No.2, 6, No.2, 6, 13, four, 22, No.2, 6, 15, 31.08.2012, 19.11.2013, 31.08.2012, 17
PERSON: Bhobe, Agha, Agha, Haryana, Haryana, Goa, Mohamad Ansari, Bhobe, 19/09/2010, Bhobe, Agha
DATE: 19/11/2013, 2012, Rs.40,000/- per month, 3 to 4 days, 18.09.2010, 19th September, 2010, Rs.10,000/-, Rs.10,000/-, 2012, 19/11/2013, Rs.10,000/- per month, 2012, 2013, 24/02/2014, 19/11/2013, Rs.10,000/-, Rs.5,000/- per month, 19/11/2013, 18/09/2010, April 2012, Rs.40,628/-, Rs.26,105/-, 14, 2013, Rs.40,000/- per month, Rs.26,105/-, 20, 21, Rs.5,000/- per month, 19/11/2013, 19/11/2013, monthly, 16, 19/11/2013, 2012, Rs.10,000/-
ORG: Additional Sessions, FTC-II, Margao, Criminal Appeal, Judicial Magistrate, no.1, Criminal Case, J.M.F.C. 4, the Protection of Women, Uttar Pradesh, Kurushetra University, Mass Communication Department, Government Hospital, J.M.F.C. 7, the Nazir of the Court, Appellate Court, the Appellate Court, the Appellate Court, Court, the Appellate Court, Counsel, the Appellate Court, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, Court, Revision Application, Counsel, Learned Counsel, the Appellate Court, Criminal Appeal No.90/2012, Appellate Court, Criminal Case No.27/DVA/2010, the Appellate Court, inter alia, Civil Revision, Court, no.1, Court, a Civil Court, Family Court, a Criminal Court, Magistrate, Criminal Appeal No.90/2012, the Appellate Court, Criminal Appeal, the Appellate Court, Criminal Appeal, the Appellate Court, Criminal Appeal No.90/2012, Appellate Court
WORK_OF_ART: Appellate Court, J.M.F.C., 09/11/2009
PRODUCT: No.1, no.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, Judgment, no.1, No.1, No.1, no.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, no.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, no.1, No.1, No.1
NORP: Muslim
FAC: Kushi Nagar, Gharaunda Karnal, the Criminal Case No.27/DVA/2010/C
GPE: Vasco, J.M.F.C., Rs.1,00,000/-, Cr, P.C., J.M.F.C., Rs.1,00,000/-, J.M.F.C., J.M.F.C., J.M.F.C., P.C., J.M.F.C., J.M.F.C., Cr, P.C., J.M.F.C., Cr, P.C., Rs.1,00,000/-, Rs.1,00,000/-, J.M.F.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., J.M.F.C., Cr, P.C., J.M.F.C., J.M.F.C., Rs.1,00,000/-, J.M.F.C., Rs.1,00,000/-, J.M.F.C., J.M.F.C., J.M.F.C., Cr, P.C., Rs.1,00,000/-
ORDINAL: 7th, 7th, 7th